We do the sorting. You do the medicine.

Pharmacology, the reference

Sheet 03 · 129 explained concepts · in the order of the cards

Each entry says why the rule holds, the tempting wrong answer and why it is wrong, and what the books say. Then the clues that point to it: tap one to see the answer.

Study notes in our own words, checked against the named textbooks and guidelines. Not for patient care. Not affiliated with any examining body.

Core rulesAll entries001 / 129, open the list of all entries

Core rulesDosing by weight, age and organ function

  1. 001Obesity: succinylcholine on total body weight in every source; rocuronium and vecuronium on lean weight; cisatracurium and propofol infusions disputed
  2. 002Remifentanil in the elderly: halve the bolus, cut the infusion to about a third
  3. 003Cisatracurium needs no dose change in the elderly: organ-independent Hofmann elimination
  4. 004Cerebral palsy: lower MAC; relaxant recovery often prolonged (Stoelting), though anticonvulsant-treated patients may resist non-depolarisers (Faust, Mayo)
  5. 005Ageing raises brain sensitivity to propofol and midazolam; for etomidate the books differ (Barash unchanged, Stoelting increased)
  6. 006Ageing: cardiac output, lean mass, body water and clearance fall while fat rises
  7. 007Rocuronium in end-stage renal disease: clearance falls by about a third (mainly biliary, 10-25% renal), so its effect can be prolonged
  8. 008Remifentanil clearance is fastest in infants
Core rules001 / 129

Obesity: succinylcholine on total body weight in every source; rocuronium and vecuronium on lean weight; cisatracurium and propofol infusions disputed

In obesity, succinylcholine is the one drug every source doses on total weight. Rocuronium and vecuronium go on lean or ideal weight; cisatracurium is disputed.

Why

Obesity raises plasma cholinesterase activity and expands extracellular fluid, so succinylcholine needs total-weight dosing for dependable paralysis. Rocuronium on total weight delays recovery, so it and vecuronium use lean weight. Sources diverge: Miller doses cisatracurium and midazolam on total weight, while Faust puts other relaxants on lean weight; textbooks scale the propofol induction bolus to lean weight but infusions to total weight. UK obesity guidelines place only succinylcholine on total weight, propofol infusions on adjusted weight. Without succinylcholine, textbooks point to midazolam or a propofol infusion; guidelines to none.

The trap

Dexmedetomidine, total weight in one text. Dexmedetomidine tempts because Barash's obesity table does place it on total body weight. It remains the wrong pick because only one text does so, much as only Miller puts cisatracurium on total weight while Barash and guidelines put it on lean. Succinylcholine is the one drug all sources agree on.

Evidence

Barash: succinylcholine on total weight, as pseudocholinesterase and extracellular fluid rise; rocuronium on lean. Miller: propofol, vecuronium and rocuronium on ideal weight; midazolam, succinylcholine, cisatracurium and fentanyl on total; boluses on lean mass, infusions total. Faust: succinylcholine total, other relaxants lean.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Obese patient: which neuromuscular blocker do every source agree should be dosed on total body weight?

Succinylcholine.

In obesity, rocuronium and vecuronium are dosed on which weight, and why not total weight for rocuronium?

Lean or ideal weight; total weight delays recovery.

Common misconception That all relaxants follow succinylcholine onto total weight

Report a problem with entry 1: Obesity: succinylcholine on total body weight in every source; rocuronium and vecuronium on lean weight; cisatracurium and propofol infusions disputed

Core rules002 / 129

Remifentanil in the elderly: halve the bolus, cut the infusion to about a third

In older patients, the remifentanil bolus is about half the young-adult dose, and the infusion rate is about one-third that of a young adult.

Why

With age the brain becomes more sensitive to remifentanil. This pharmacodynamic change causes most of the lower requirement, and changes in drug handling play only a minor part. General texts give an overall reduction of at least 50%. Stoelting separates it by dose type: a bolus needs about half the young-adult dose, while a running infusion needs a rate of about one-third that of a young adult. So treat 50% as the smallest cut, and reduce the maintenance infusion further than the bolus.

The trap

Halving the infusion rate like the bolus dose. Half is easy to remember because it is the bolus figure and the overall 'at least 50%' figure. For an infusion, though, the books go further, to a rate of about one-third that of young adults. Halving the infusion would still overdose an older patient.

Evidence

Stoelting advises roughly half the bolus and about one-third of the infusion rate in older patients. Miller's says the lower need comes mainly from greater sensitivity, and gives an overall dose reduction of at least 50%.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An 82-year-old needs a remifentanil bolus at induction. How should it compare with a young adult's bolus?

About half the young-adult bolus.

Is cutting a 78-year-old's remifentanil maintenance to 50% of the usual adult rate sufficient?

No; aim for roughly a third of what a young adult receives.

Common misconception That halving the infusion rate is enough in older patients

Report a problem with entry 2: Remifentanil in the elderly: halve the bolus, cut the infusion to about a third

Core rules003 / 129

Cisatracurium needs no dose change in the elderly: organ-independent Hofmann elimination

Give older patients the usual cisatracurium dose; breakdown is organ-independent, so clearance and recovery are unchanged. Expect slightly slower onset.

Why

Ageing slows the clearance of drugs that depend on hepatic blood flow or renal excretion, so vecuronium and fentanyl have longer-lasting effects in older patients. Cisatracurium is eliminated mainly through Hofmann degradation, which is independent of both organs, so its clearance is unchanged. Its elimination half-life is slightly longer, but this reflects only a modestly larger volume of distribution and does not delay recovery. Onset is slower because the drug takes longer to reach its site of action. If onset is slow, wait longer rather than giving a larger dose.

The trap

Vecuronium needs dose change in elderly patients. Vecuronium is tempting because it is also an intermediate-acting non-depolarising relaxant, so the two seem interchangeable. But it relies on organ excretion. In older patients, slower excretion makes its half-life and action longer, so its dosing needs adjusting.

Evidence

Older patients clear cisatracurium as fast as younger ones; its slightly longer half-life reflects a modestly larger distribution volume, and recovery is unchanged, with only onset slower. By contrast, slower excretion prolongs vecuronium, and fentanyl clearance falls because it depends on liver blood flow.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A frail 85-year-old is to receive cisatracurium. Should the dose be cut for age?

No; give the usual dose, as Hofmann elimination is organ-independent.

Cisatracurium onset seems slow in a 79-year-old. Should you give a further dose?

No; wait longer. Onset is slower but recovery is unchanged.

Report a problem with entry 3: Cisatracurium needs no dose change in the elderly: organ-independent Hofmann elimination

Core rules004 / 129

Cerebral palsy: lower MAC; relaxant recovery often prolonged (Stoelting), though anticonvulsant-treated patients may resist non-depolarisers (Faust, Mayo)

In cerebral palsy, relaxant recovery and volatile emergence both run long; give less volatile and titrate relaxant doses to monitored neuromuscular function.

Why

Stoelting states that children with cerebral palsy need less volatile agent, wake slowly, and recover slowly from neuromuscular block, so a prolonged relaxant effect is the expected default. Faust adds a branch: patients on chronic anticonvulsants may resist non-depolarisers, without the hyperkalaemic response to succinylcholine. So the condition itself slows recovery, while anticonvulsant therapy can raise the dose needed; the net requirement is unpredictable. Give relaxant in small increments to monitored effect and confirm full recovery before extubation, remembering that larger doses in resistant patients also raise residual-block risk.

The trap

Ketamine causes delayed emergence in cerebral palsy. Ketamine's tempting because a large intramuscular dose can markedly delay emergence, but that delay is dose- and route-dependent in any child, not specific to cerebral palsy. It is also proconvulsant, so best avoided in seizure-prone patients. Cerebral palsy-specific prolongation affects relaxant recovery and volatile emergence.

Evidence

Stoelting: cerebral palsy lowers volatile requirement, emergence is often delayed, and relaxants need caution because block recovery is usually prolonged. Miller also records a lower MAC. Faust notes resistance to non-depolarisers in anticonvulsant-treated conditions including cerebral palsy, without succinylcholine hyperkalaemia.

Sources: Stoelting 8eFaustMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 9-year-old with cerebral palsy has sevoflurane anaesthesia. How does his volatile need compare with other children?

Lower; less volatile is needed and emergence is slower.

A teenager with cerebral palsy on long-term anticonvulsants needs a non-depolariser. How should you give it?

Small increments titrated to monitoring; requirement is unpredictable.

Report a problem with entry 4: Cerebral palsy: lower MAC; relaxant recovery often prolonged (Stoelting), though anticonvulsant-treated patients may resist non-depolarisers (Faust, Mayo)

Core rules005 / 129

Ageing raises brain sensitivity to propofol and midazolam; for etomidate the books differ (Barash unchanged, Stoelting increased)

In the elderly, reduce propofol and midazolam doses partly because the brain is more sensitive. Etomidate's brain sensitivity is disputed, so choose propofol.

Why

Older patients need less hypnotic for two separate reasons. The first is pharmacokinetic: a smaller central compartment and slower redistribution mean a bolus reaches higher effect-site levels. The second is pharmacodynamic: the ageing brain responds more to the same concentration. For propofol, Miller describes sensitivity that rises with concentration, and Barash lists raised brain sensitivity. Stoelting attributes midazolam's large elderly dose cut mainly to pharmacodynamics. The sources split on etomidate: Barash lists unchanged brain sensitivity, while Stoelting reports increased sensitivity. Propofol is the agent both sources agree on.

The trap

Etomidate sensitivity unchanged with age. Etomidate is tempting because its elderly bolus is cut substantially and it is the classic induction agent for frail patients. But Barash lists its brain sensitivity as unchanged, which makes the dose cut kinetic in that source. Only Stoelting reports increased sensitivity. Propofol's increased sensitivity is not disputed.

Evidence

Barash notes, by some accounts, raised propofol brain sensitivity in older patients but unchanged thiopental and etomidate sensitivity, though both need lower doses. Miller: older patients' EEG and blood pressure propofol sensitivity rises with concentration. Stoelting: older patients are markedly more midazolam-sensitive, mainly pharmacodynamically.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Apart from kinetic changes, why does a 75-year-old need less propofol for induction?

The ageing brain is more sensitive to propofol.

Which induction agent has a disputed change in brain sensitivity with age, making it the less certain pick?

Etomidate; only propofol's raised sensitivity is agreed.

Common misconception That etomidate's raised brain sensitivity in old age is undisputed

Report a problem with entry 5: Ageing raises brain sensitivity to propofol and midazolam; for etomidate the books differ (Barash unchanged, Stoelting increased)

Core rules006 / 129

Ageing: cardiac output, lean mass, body water and clearance fall while fat rises

In older patients, only body fat rises. Cardiac output, GFR, liver blood flow, body water, lean mass and albumin all fall.

Why

With age, muscle and water compartments shrink while adipose tissue grows. Water-soluble drugs therefore spread through a smaller volume, and lipid-soluble drugs spread through a larger reservoir. Serum albumin falls, so less drug is bound and more circulates free. Cardiac output, renal filtration, hepatic perfusion and liver enzyme activity all decline. Drugs are cleared more slowly, and their effects last longer.

The trap

Body fat decreases with age. Lean mass, water and most organ functions decline with age, so someone may assume fat falls too. It does the opposite: the proportion of body fat rises as lean tissue is lost. That is why lipid-soluble drugs have a larger volume of distribution in older patients.

Evidence

Ageing lowers total body water, lean body mass and serum albumin, and raises total body fat. It also reduces cardiac output, glomerular filtration and hepatic blood flow and enzyme activity. Together these slow the elimination of neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Between the ages of 30 and 80, which body compartment increases?

Body fat; lean mass, water and organ blood flows fall.

Why does a lipid-soluble drug have a larger distribution volume in an 85-year-old woman?

Her proportion of body fat has risen with age.

Common misconception That body fat falls along with lean mass in old age

Report a problem with entry 6: Ageing: cardiac output, lean mass, body water and clearance fall while fat rises

Core rules007 / 129

Rocuronium in end-stage renal disease: clearance falls by about a third (mainly biliary, 10-25% renal), so its effect can be prolonged

Rocuronium lasts longer in renal failure because reduced renal excretion lowers clearance, but it is mainly cleared in bile, so prolongation is modest.

Why

The liver takes up most rocuronium, which leaves in bile. The kidney handles only 10%-25%. In renal failure, losing that share still cuts plasma clearance by about 33% to 39%, so plasma levels fall more slowly and recovery from block is delayed. Volume of distribution barely changes, and there is no active metabolite to accumulate. Because most of the drug bypasses the kidney, the block lasts only somewhat longer. Drugs relying mainly on the kidney are affected far more.

The trap

Kidney is main elimination route for rocuronium. This looks right because the block lasts longer in renal failure, so the kidney seems to be the main exit. It is not: bile carries most of the drug. The block is prolonged because the smaller renal share is lost and clearance falls, not because the kidney dominates.

Evidence

In renal failure, rocuronium clearance falls by 33% to 39%. Volume of distribution is unchanged or slightly raised, and humans form no active metabolites. Elimination is mainly hepatic and biliary, with 10%-25% renal. Renal disease is expected to slow its excretion.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo reviewStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient on haemodialysis receives rocuronium. What happens to the duration of block, and why?

Modestly longer; the renal share of clearance is lost.

Which route removes most rocuronium from the body?

Biliary excretion; the kidney handles only 10%-25%.

Common misconception That the kidney is rocuronium's main route of excretion

Report a problem with entry 7: Rocuronium in end-stage renal disease: clearance falls by about a third (mainly biliary, 10-25% renal), so its effect can be prolonged

Core rules008 / 129

Remifentanil clearance is fastest in infants

Remifentanil is an exception to slow clearance in the young: neonates and infants clear it fastest, faster than older children, so choose the youngest group.

Why

Most drugs are cleared by the liver and kidneys. These organs are immature early in life, so the youngest patients usually clear drugs slowly. Remifentanil is different because non-specific esterases in plasma and tissues break it down, and these do not depend on the liver or kidneys maturing. Infants also have a larger volume of distribution than older children. Immature organs therefore do not slow its elimination, and clearance is fastest in the youngest patients. Its kinetics also vary unusually little between patients at this age.

The trap

Adults clear remifentanil fastest. Adults are tempting because their liver and kidneys are fully mature, and for most drugs that means the fastest clearance. It fails because blood and tissue esterases break remifentanil down, not those organs. Mature organs therefore give adults no advantage, and the youngest patients clear it fastest.

Evidence

Miller states that, unlike most drugs, remifentanil is cleared faster by neonates than older children, attributed to breakdown by non-specific plasma and tissue esterases and a larger volume of distribution. Immature liver and kidney function does not alter its kinetics.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which group clears remifentanil fastest: infants, school-age children or adults?

Neonates and infants.

Common misconception That mature adult organs give the fastest remifentanil clearance

Why do immature liver and kidneys not slow remifentanil clearance in a 2-month-old?

Plasma and tissue esterases break it down, independent of organ maturity.

Report a problem with entry 8: Remifentanil clearance is fastest in infants

Back to card 1Back to contents

Core rulesDepth decides the reversal

  1. 009Cisatracurium with fewer than four twitches: wait for four, then neostigmine 40-50 mcg/kg plus an antimuscarinic; sugammadex cannot reverse it
  2. 010Sugammadex 4 mg/kg for deep rocuronium block (post-tetanic count 1-2)
  3. 011Sugammadex 16 mg/kg for immediate reversal after rocuronium when waking the patient; not a rescue for cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate
  4. 012Train-of-four ratio still 0.3 after neostigmine: do not extubate; sugammadex, or more neostigmine only within its total ceiling
  5. 013Sugammadex binds rocuronium most, then vecuronium; not benzylisoquinoliniums
Core rules009 / 129

Cisatracurium with fewer than four twitches: wait for four, then neostigmine 40-50 mcg/kg plus an antimuscarinic; sugammadex cannot reverse it

After cisatracurium with fewer than four twitches, do not reverse yet: ventilate until four twitches, then neostigmine 40–50 mcg/kg plus antimuscarinic; confirm recovery quantitatively.

Why

Neostigmine only slows acetylcholine breakdown, so its effect has a ceiling and cannot outcompete a relaxant still occupying most receptors. Anticholinesterases were once given as soon as a few twitches returned. Barash now advises against any anticholinesterase for moderate or deep block; allow spontaneous recovery to four twitches first. Sugammadex binds only steroidal relaxants and cannot reverse cisatracurium. Spontaneous breathing does not exclude residual block; only quantitative monitoring confirms its resolution.

The trap

Give neostigmine at two twitches. This is the right drug, dose and antimuscarinic partner, so it looks correct. With only two twitches the block is still moderate, and neostigmine's ceiling makes full antagonism unlikely. It becomes correct only after recovery reaches four twitches, so here the dose is right but the timing is too early.

Evidence

Barash no longer advises anticholinesterase reversal of moderate or deep block, and gives neostigmine 40 to 50 mcg/kg once there are four twitches (shallow block). The ASA says cisatracurium responds only to anticholinesterases and not to sugammadex. Miller describes a ceiling on the acetylcholine rise.

Sources: Barash 9eOutside our books: 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade (2023)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
At the end of surgery after cisatracurium, the train-of-four count is two. What do you do?

Keep ventilating; reverse only once four twitches return.

Common misconception That neostigmine can be given as soon as two twitches return

Four responses are back after cisatracurium. What is your reversal plan?

Neostigmine at 40–50 mcg/kg, paired with glycopyrrolate or atropine; quantify recovery.

Report a problem with entry 9: Cisatracurium with fewer than four twitches: wait for four, then neostigmine 40-50 mcg/kg plus an antimuscarinic; sugammadex cannot reverse it

Core rules010 / 129

Sugammadex 4 mg/kg for deep rocuronium block (post-tetanic count 1-2)

If train-of-four shows no twitches but post-tetanic count is 1–2, the block is deep: give sugammadex 4 mg/kg; reserve 16 mg/kg for no post-tetanic response.

Why

Sugammadex reverses the block by encapsulating free rocuronium, so the dose depends on how much blocker still acts at the junction. A post-tetanic response shows some receptors are already free despite a silent train-of-four. This indicates deep, not complete, block, and a medium dose reverses it within minutes. Only when post-tetanic stimulation also gives nothing is there enough blocker to need 16 mg/kg. One textbook gives a wider dose range for deep block, but its lowest dose is the labelled dose, so that is the standard answer.

The trap

Complete block needs 4mg/kg sugammadex. A train-of-four count of zero looks like 'no response', so people reach for the complete-block dose. Complete block means post-tetanic stimulation fails too. Any post-tetanic response means the block is deep, and the medium dose already reverses it fully.

Evidence

Drug label and Miller both give 4 mg/kg when train-of-four twitches are absent but post-tetanic responses are present; Miller reserves 16 mg/kg for no post-tetanic response. In a trial, over 97% of patients given this dose reached a train-of-four ratio of 0.90 within 5 minutes.

Sources: Outside our books: BRIDION (sugammadex) injection, US prescribing information: sections 2, 5 and 12 (2015)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Silent train-of-four but two post-tetanic responses after rocuronium. How much sugammadex?

4 mg/kg: the block is deep, not complete.

Rocuronium has left no train-of-four response. What finding justifies 16 mg/kg over 4 mg/kg?

Absent post-tetanic twitches as well.

Common misconception That a train-of-four count of zero always needs 16 mg/kg

Report a problem with entry 10: Sugammadex 4 mg/kg for deep rocuronium block (post-tetanic count 1-2)

Core rules011 / 129

Sugammadex 16 mg/kg for immediate reversal after rocuronium when waking the patient; not a rescue for cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate

Straight after intubating-dose rocuronium, waking the patient needs sugammadex 16 mg/kg; if oxygenation fails, go to front-of-neck access, not reversal.

Why

Sugammadex is a cyclodextrin that binds rocuronium directly, so the dose must match the drug load. Minutes after an intubating dose the block is profound: only the largest dose clears it, and anticholinesterases cannot. Faust and Barash offered this dose as a way out of cannot-intubate-cannot-ventilate. The newer DAS guidance later judged that unreliable, because reversal may provoke laryngospasm or aspiration and cannot ensure an open airway. So once waking is chosen, give the full dose while oxygenating; if oxygenation fails, go to front-of-neck access.

The trap

4 mg/kg deep-block dose. 4 mg/kg is the familiar sugammadex dose for deep block, so it looks like the right reversal. But that dose is meant for a block that still shows post-tetanic responses. Minutes after an intubating dose there are none, and too little drug leaves the patient paralysed.

Evidence

Sugammadex binds rocuronium and rapidly reverses any depth of block where anticholinesterases are contraindicated. Profound block after an intubating dose, even with failed mask ventilation, needs 16 mg/kg, used to wake the patient with oxygenation maintained. DAS regards it as an unreliable rescue: the airway is not assured.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eDifficult Airway Society 2025

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Two minutes after rocuronium for intubation, the surgeon cancels the case and you choose to wake the patient with oxygenation maintained. What sugammadex dose?

16 mg/kg.

After rocuronium, intubation fails, mask ventilation fails and saturation falls. Should you reach for sugammadex as the rescue?

No; go to front-of-neck access. Reversal is an unreliable rescue and may not leave an open airway.

Common misconception That sugammadex reliably rescues cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate

Report a problem with entry 11: Sugammadex 16 mg/kg for immediate reversal after rocuronium when waking the patient; not a rescue for cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate

Core rules012 / 129

Train-of-four ratio still 0.3 after neostigmine: do not extubate; sugammadex, or more neostigmine only within its total ceiling

With train-of-four ratio under 0.9 after peak neostigmine, stay intubated and reverse again: sugammadex for rocuronium, or extra neostigmine only within 50 μg/kg total.

Why

Neostigmine works only by slowing acetylcholine breakdown, so its effect has a ceiling. A ratio below 0.4 after its peak is shallow block, for which ASA prefers sugammadex, which binds rocuronium directly. The sources set the neostigmine limit at different levels. Barash allows repeats up to 0.1 mg/kg and warns of acetylcholine-related weakness. Faust's table tops out at 70 μg/kg. ASA caps the total at 50 μg/kg because more adds no effect. Staying within 50 μg/kg satisfies all three.

The trap

Ventilate patient another day in ICU. A day of ICU ventilation feels like the safest choice, but it treats a reversible drug effect as respiratory failure. Residual rocuronium block can be reversed now with sugammadex, or with a neostigmine top-up within its ceiling. The patient is then extubated once the ratio reaches target.

Evidence

ASA requires a ratio of at least 0.9 before extubation, recommends sugammadex for rocuronium block including shallow block, and caps added neostigmine at 50 μg/kg total. Faust's table doses neostigmine at up to 70 μg/kg. Barash permits repeats short of 0.1 mg/kg.

Sources: Outside our books: 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade (2023)Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Rocuronium was antagonised with neostigmine; at its peak the measured ratio is only 0.35. Next step?

Keep the tube in and give sugammadex.

If you top up neostigmine for residual block, what total dose should you stay within?

50 μg/kg in total.

Report a problem with entry 12: Train-of-four ratio still 0.3 after neostigmine: do not extubate; sugammadex, or more neostigmine only within its total ceiling

Core rules013 / 129

Sugammadex binds rocuronium most, then vecuronium; not benzylisoquinoliniums

Sugammadex reverses only steroidal relaxants. It binds rocuronium most tightly, vecuronium less and pancuronium negligibly. It does not bind cisatracurium or suxamethonium.

Why

Sugammadex is a gamma-cyclodextrin: a ring-shaped sugar with a hollow core. That core wraps around the steroid skeleton of an aminosteroid relaxant and traps it, so the drug can no longer act at the receptor. Rocuronium fits best. Vecuronium binds with 2.5-fold lower affinity but is still held tightly enough to reverse clinically. Pancuronium binds too weakly to matter. Relaxants without a steroid core have nothing for the ring to encapsulate, so sugammadex has no effect on them. These include benzylisoquinoliniums such as cisatracurium, and depolarising agents.

The trap

Vecuronium binds as tightly as rocuronium. Vecuronium is also a steroidal relaxant, and sugammadex reliably reverses vecuronium block, so it looks like an equal answer. Its affinity is lower than rocuronium's, though. The drug sugammadex binds with the highest affinity is rocuronium.

Evidence

The textbooks rank sugammadex affinity as rocuronium, then vecuronium, with pancuronium far behind and clinically insignificant. Vecuronium's affinity is 2.5 times lower than rocuronium's but still forms a firm complex. Sugammadex has no affinity for depolarising relaxants or for non-steroidal non-depolarising relaxants.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which relaxant does sugammadex bind with the highest affinity?

Rocuronium; vecuronium less, pancuronium negligibly.

Common misconception That vecuronium binds sugammadex as tightly as rocuronium

A patient was paralysed with cisatracurium. Will sugammadex reverse the block?

No; it binds only steroidal relaxants.

Report a problem with entry 13: Sugammadex binds rocuronium most, then vecuronium; not benzylisoquinoliniums

Back to card 2Back to contents

Core rulesMinimum alveolar concentration (MAC): what moves it

  1. 014MAC rises with hyperthermia, hypernatraemia and chronic alcohol; falls with age, pregnancy, hypothermia and lithium
  2. 015MAC falls about 6% per decade of age
Core rules014 / 129

MAC rises with hyperthermia, hypernatraemia and chronic alcohol; falls with age, pregnancy, hypothermia and lithium

Hypernatraemia, hyperthermia, chronic alcohol and young age raise MAC; older age, pregnancy, hypothermia, lithium, α2-agonists, barbiturates and acute alcohol lower it.

Why

MAC tracks central excitability: raised brain transmitter levels, sodium or temperature push it up; transmitter depletion and CNS depressants pull it down. Alcohol shows both: an acute dose depresses, chronic drinking raises requirement. Fever and chronic drinking both raise MAC; no source ranks them. Barash places levodopa in both its raising and lowering tables, Mayo among raisers, so it decides nothing. Cyclosporine appears in no MAC list. For pregnancy, Miller's human first-trimester figure is lower than Faust's upper bound of 40%; both are book values.

The trap

Chronic alcohol lowers or doesn't change MAC. Alcohol is a CNS depressant, so assuming chronic use lowers MAC or leaves it unchanged feels natural. It fails because only acute ingestion lowers MAC; long-term drinking raises it, so it is never a no-change factor.

Evidence

Mayo lists hyperthermia, hypernatraemia and chronic ethanol abuse as raising MAC; Barash lists lithium, α2-agonists, hypothermia, barbiturates, pregnancy and acute ethanol as lowering it. For pregnancy, Miller gives 28% in humans and 40% in animals in the first trimester; Faust gives 25% to 40%.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 45-year-old who drinks heavily every day needs volatile anaesthesia. How is his MAC changed?

Raised; chronic alcohol use increases requirement.

Common misconception That chronic drinking lowers MAC like an acute dose

A patient on lithium is mildly hypothermic. Is MAC raised or lowered?

Lowered; lithium and hypothermia both reduce MAC.

Report a problem with entry 14: MAC rises with hyperthermia, hypernatraemia and chronic alcohol; falls with age, pregnancy, hypothermia and lithium

Core rules015 / 129

MAC falls about 6% per decade of age

Expect MAC to fall by about 6% for each decade of age. Elderly patients need less volatile agent, and infants need more.

Why

The amount of anaesthetic needed tracks how active the brain is. Anything that lowers cerebral metabolic rate lowers MAC: ageing, cooling, hypoxia, hypotension and depressant drugs. States that raise central neurotransmitter activity push MAC up. These include hyperthermia, MAO inhibitors and youth. The sources agree on the 6% figure. Barash applies it across age generally. Stoelting quotes it for volatiles after 40 and gives nitrous oxide a slightly steeper fall of 8% per decade. So use 6% per decade, and give an octogenarian noticeably less agent.

The trap

Hyperthermia lowers MAC. Temperature really does change MAC, so hyperthermia looks like a reasonable answer for a factor that lowers it. The direction is backwards. Cooling lowers cerebral metabolism and MAC. Hyperthermia raises MAC, and so do MAO inhibitors.

Evidence

Barash says MAC falls by roughly 6% per decade of age. Stoelting gives the same figure for volatiles after 40, and 8% for nitrous oxide. Faust links the fall to lower cerebral metabolic rate. Hyperthermia, MAO inhibitors and younger age raise MAC.

Sources: Barash 9eFaustStoelting 8eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
By roughly how much does MAC fall for each decade of age?

About 6% per decade.

A 4-month-old and an 80-year-old each receive sevoflurane. Which needs more than a young adult?

The infant; infancy raises MAC, old age lowers it.

Report a problem with entry 15: MAC falls about 6% per decade of age

Back to card 3Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsThe medicine list

  1. 016Pethidine, tramadol and methadone with an MAO inhibitor cause serotonin toxicity; morphine is the safe choice
  2. 017MAO inhibitor and hypotension: use a direct-acting vasopressor, avoid ephedrine
  3. 018Tramadol lowers the seizure threshold and interacts with serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIs, tricyclics)
  4. 019Cyclosporine: ranitidine and cimetidine are listed as potentiating its renal dysfunction; metoclopramide raises its levels
  5. 020Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are CYP3A4 substrates: inducers such as phenytoin lower their levels
  6. 021Hydroxychloroquine prolongs the QT interval
  7. 022Herbal medicines: feverfew gives rebound headache on stopping; St John's wort induces CYP3A4; valerian and kava sedate and potentiate anaesthetics
  8. 023Dapsone methaemoglobinaemia: cyanosis despite oxygen, give methylene blue
  9. 024G6PD deficiency: methylene blue is contraindicated
Part 1016 / 129

Pethidine, tramadol and methadone with an MAO inhibitor cause serotonin toxicity; morphine is the safe choice

In a patient on any MAO inhibitor, including selegiline, avoid pethidine, tramadol and methadone; choose morphine, and use fentanyl-type opioids cautiously.

Why

MAO inhibitors stop serotonin from being broken down. Pethidine, tramadol and methadone also block its reuptake. Together, serotonin builds up in the synapse and overstimulates central 5-HT1A receptors. This causes serotonin syndrome: confusion, agitation, fever, sweating, ataxia, hyperreflexia and myoclonus. Morphine has no useful reuptake-blocking action, so it is the safer choice. Fentanyl and its relatives are in the same chemical family and have been linked to toxicity in case reports. Their serotonergic effect is weak, so they can still be used with care.

The trap

Tramadol is a mild safe choice. Tramadol looks like a mild, weak opioid, so it seems a gentle and harmless choice. But it blocks serotonin reuptake, and with MAO inhibition that brings on serotonin syndrome. For that reason it is avoided along with pethidine and methadone.

Evidence

Giving pethidine with an MAO inhibitor can cause serotonin syndrome. Pethidine, methadone and tramadol should be avoided in these patients, and morphine is safer. Phenylpiperidine opioids are weak serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Selegiline, used in Parkinson's disease, is an MAO inhibitor.

Sources: Miller 10eFaustBarash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient taking phenelzine needs postoperative opioid analgesia. Which opioid is safest?

Morphine.

A patient on selegiline requests tramadol as a gentle painkiller. Appropriate?

No; tramadol with an MAO inhibitor risks serotonin syndrome.

Common misconception That tramadol is a harmless mild opioid with MAO inhibitors

Report a problem with entry 16: Pethidine, tramadol and methadone with an MAO inhibitor cause serotonin toxicity; morphine is the safe choice

Part 1017 / 129

MAO inhibitor and hypotension: use a direct-acting vasopressor, avoid ephedrine

On an MAOI, treat hypotension with a small, titrated dose of a direct-acting vasopressor such as phenylephrine. Never give ephedrine or other indirect agents.

Why

MAO normally breaks down noradrenaline inside sympathetic nerve endings, so blocking it leaves those stores enlarged. Indirect-acting agents such as ephedrine work mainly by releasing that stored noradrenaline. The surge is unpredictable and can cause a hypertensive crisis. Direct-acting agents act on the receptors themselves and do not depend on the stores, so you can predict and titrate their effect. The receptor response may still be exaggerated, so start with a reduced dose and titrate carefully.

The trap

Ephedrine is the first choice here. Ephedrine is the usual first choice for hypotension after induction because it is familiar and raises both heart rate and pressure. It fails here because it acts mostly by releasing stored noradrenaline. Under MAO inhibition those stores are enlarged, so the release risks a hypertensive crisis.

Evidence

One text advises small, carefully titrated doses of direct-acting agents (phenylephrine, noradrenaline, vasopressin, dopamine) and avoiding indirect agents, above all ephedrine, which can provoke hypertensive crisis. The other recommends phenylephrine, at a reduced dose to limit excessive pressor response.

Sources: Stoelting 8eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Hypotension follows induction in a patient on an MAO inhibitor. Which vasopressor?

Small, titrated phenylephrine: a direct-acting agent.

Why is ephedrine dangerous in a patient taking an MAO inhibitor?

It releases enlarged noradrenaline stores, risking hypertensive crisis.

Common misconception That ephedrine is a safe first-line pressor in every patient

Report a problem with entry 17: MAO inhibitor and hypotension: use a direct-acting vasopressor, avoid ephedrine

Part 1018 / 129

Tramadol lowers the seizure threshold and interacts with serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIs, tricyclics)

Avoid tramadol, or use it cautiously, with tricyclics, SSRIs or existing seizure risk; the combination risks seizures and serotonin syndrome.

Why

Tramadol is not a pure opioid. It also has strong serotonergic effects and can cause fits even when given on its own. Tricyclics and SSRIs lower the seizure threshold too, so the two risks add together. Their combined serotonergic effect can also cause serotonin syndrome: confusion, autonomic instability and neuromuscular excitability. Ondansetron works differently. It is a serotonin antagonist, and its known interaction is to weaken part of tramadol's pain relief.

The trap

Ondansetron interacts with tramadol seizure threshold. Ondansetron is tempting because it is the drug best known for interacting with tramadol through serotonin. But it blocks serotonin receptors, and the sources link it only to reduced analgesia, not to fits. The drug that lowers the seizure threshold here is the tricyclic.

Evidence

Tramadol has caused fits when given by itself. It needs care alongside agents that lower the threshold for fits, such as tricyclics and SSRIs. With serotonergic antidepressants it risks serotonin syndrome, and it is barred with MAO inhibitors. Ondansetron partly blunts its analgesia.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman on amitriptyline is prescribed tramadol. Which two risks does the combination carry?

Seizures and serotonin syndrome.

Which co-medication adds seizure risk with tramadol: ondansetron or a tricyclic?

The tricyclic; ondansetron only weakens tramadol's analgesia.

Common misconception That ondansetron lowers the seizure threshold with tramadol

Report a problem with entry 18: Tramadol lowers the seizure threshold and interacts with serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIs, tricyclics)

Part 1019 / 129

Cyclosporine: ranitidine and cimetidine are listed as potentiating its renal dysfunction; metoclopramide raises its levels

For cyclosporine, the label's renal-dysfunction list names the acid-suppressing drugs ranitidine and cimetidine; metoclopramide instead raises cyclosporine levels by increasing its absorption.

Why

The cyclosporine label, a source outside the textbooks, keeps two separate interaction lists. The first names drugs whose own kidney effects add to cyclosporine's. Its gastrointestinal agents are ranitidine and cimetidine, so creatinine should be watched and doses cut if function falls. The second covers drugs that change cyclosporine concentration. Metoclopramide speeds delivery into the small bowel, where more cyclosporine is absorbed and levels rise, so doses are adjusted to measured concentrations. So the drug that worsens kidney function alongside cyclosporine comes from the first list.

The trap

Metoclopramide potentiates renal dysfunction. Metoclopramide is a real cyclosporine interaction, so it feels right. But the label puts it among drugs that raise cyclosporine concentration through better small-bowel absorption, not on the list of drugs that potentiate renal dysfunction. That list's gastrointestinal agents are ranitidine and cimetidine.

Evidence

Cimetidine and ranitidine may add to renal dysfunction. With cyclosporine plus drugs with additive or synergistic renal effects, monitor renal function closely, especially serum creatinine. Small-bowel absorption may increase; adjust Sandimmune dose to achieve intended concentrations when other drugs substantially alter levels.

Sources: Outside our books: SANDIMMUNE (cyclosporine) capsule, liquid filled / SANDIMMUNE (cyclosporine) injection - FDA-approved prescribing information (2026)Outside our books: METOCLOPRAMIDE tablet - FDA-approved prescribing information (2010)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A kidney recipient takes cyclosporine. Which acid-suppressing drugs does its label list as adding renal dysfunction?

Ranitidine and cimetidine.

How does metoclopramide alter cyclosporine therapy?

It raises cyclosporine levels by improving small-bowel absorption.

Common misconception That metoclopramide is on cyclosporine's renal-dysfunction list

Report a problem with entry 19: Cyclosporine: ranitidine and cimetidine are listed as potentiating its renal dysfunction; metoclopramide raises its levels

Part 1020 / 129

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are CYP3A4 substrates: inducers such as phenytoin lower their levels

Ciclosporin and tacrolimus are cleared by CYP3A4. Enzyme inducers such as phenytoin lower their levels and effect. Inhibitors such as macrolides raise them.

Why

Both calcineurin inhibitors are broken down in the liver by CYP3A4. Inducers such as phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine make the liver produce more of this enzyme and its reductase partner. Every CYP3A4 substrate is then cleared faster, so plasma levels and immunosuppression fall, which risks graft rejection. Inhibitors do the opposite: clearance slows, the parent drug builds up, and toxicity such as renal dysfunction and hypertension appears. The same enzyme also handles benzodiazepines, fentanyl and propofol, so these interactions work in both directions.

The trap

Erythromycin reduces cyclosporine effect. Erythromycin is one of the best-known ciclosporin interactions, so it feels like the answer. But it is a macrolide that inhibits CYP3A4. It slows ciclosporin breakdown, so levels and toxicity rise. It does not reduce the drug's effect.

Evidence

Both calcineurin inhibitors are metabolised by CYP3A4. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and rifampin are listed as hepatic enzyme inducers, and macrolides and azoles as inhibitors. Induction speeds breakdown of every CYP3A4 substrate and usually lowers efficacy. Inhibition increases the parent drug's activity.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A liver recipient on tacrolimus is started on phenytoin. What happens to tacrolimus?

Levels and effect fall, risking rejection.

Does erythromycin lower or raise ciclosporin levels?

Raises them; it inhibits CYP3A4.

Common misconception That erythromycin reduces ciclosporin's effect

Report a problem with entry 20: Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are CYP3A4 substrates: inducers such as phenytoin lower their levels

Part 1021 / 129

Hydroxychloroquine prolongs the QT interval

Among empirical coronavirus therapies, hydroxychloroquine is the one that prolongs QT; avoid combining it with other QT-lengthening or arrhythmogenic agents.

Why

This comes from the manufacturer's label, which is outside the textbook corpus. The label warns that hydroxychloroquine lengthens the QT interval and that torsades and other ventricular arrhythmias have occurred in treated patients. Its risk adds to that of other QT-lengthening or pro-arrhythmic drugs, so the label advises against giving them together. In overdose the cardiac toxicity gets worse: QRS and QTc widening, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, heart block, arrest and death.

The trap

Remdesivir prolongs QT interval. Remdesivir is the best-known coronavirus antiviral, so people may assume it carries the arrhythmia warning. In these sources the QT and torsades warning belongs to hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial that was repurposed early in the pandemic. Nothing here links remdesivir to QT lengthening.

Evidence

The only source, the hydroxychloroquine prescribing label (outside the textbook corpus), lists QT prolongation and torsades among its warnings and cardiac adverse effects, advises against co-prescribing other QT-prolonging drugs, and describes QRS and QTc widening and cardiac arrest in overdose.

Sources: Outside our books: PLAQUENIL (hydroxychloroquine sulfate) tablets, for oral use - FDA-approved prescribing information (2026)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Of remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine, both used empirically in coronavirus infection, which carries the QT and torsades warning?

Hydroxychloroquine.

Common misconception That remdesivir carries the QT warning

A patient on hydroxychloroquine needs extra medicines. Which kind should you avoid adding?

Other QT-lengthening or arrhythmogenic drugs.

Report a problem with entry 21: Hydroxychloroquine prolongs the QT interval

Part 1022 / 129

Herbal medicines: feverfew gives rebound headache on stopping; St John's wort induces CYP3A4; valerian and kava sedate and potentiate anaesthetics

Feverfew: abrupt stopping causes rebound headache. Valerian: a sedative that potentiates anaesthetics, yet mild enough to continue. St John's wort: CYP3A inducer; hold.

Why

Feverfew is taken to prevent migraine and inhibits platelets; abrupt withdrawal provokes rebound headache. Valerian's two entries answer different questions: the herbal appendix names it a sedative that potentiates barbiturates and anaesthetics, which is its effect; the preoperative supplement table grades that sedation mild and advises continuing, which is the stopping decision. St John's wort sits among CYP3A inducers, altering metabolism of co-administered drugs, and the supplement table separately warns it may prolong anaesthesia; both converge on holding it 2 wk before surgery.

The trap

Feverfew mainly affects clotting. Feverfew is known to act on platelets, so someone who remembers only a coagulation effect may pick clotting. The effect runs the other way: it inhibits platelet activity and raises bleeding risk. The distinctive feverfew answer is headache rebounding after abrupt cessation.

Evidence

The preoperative supplement table: feverfew impairs platelets and gives rebound headache on sudden cessation, hold 2 wk; St John's wort may prolong anaesthesia, hold 2 wk; valerian, mild sedative, continue. The herbal appendix: valerian potentiates barbiturates and anaesthetics. St John's wort induces CYP3A.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman who takes feverfew for migraine stops it abruptly before surgery. What may follow?

Rebound headache.

A patient takes valerian each night. How does it affect anaesthesia, and must it be stopped?

Potentiates anaesthetics; mild enough to continue.

Report a problem with entry 22: Herbal medicines: feverfew gives rebound headache on stopping; St John's wort induces CYP3A4; valerian and kava sedate and potentiate anaesthetics

Part 1023 / 129

Dapsone methaemoglobinaemia: cyanosis despite oxygen, give methylene blue

Cyanosis unrelieved by high-flow oxygen in a patient on dapsone signals methaemoglobinaemia: confirm by co-oximetry, stop the drug, give methylene blue 1 to 2 mg/kg.

Why

Oxidising agents change haem iron from the ferrous to the ferric form. This creates methaemoglobin, which can build up to dangerous levels and does not carry oxygen to the tissues. Arterial oxygen tension can look adequate while oxygen delivery fails and lactate rises, so giving more inspired oxygen cannot correct the blue colour. Co-oximetry confirms the diagnosis. The acquired, drug-induced form is reversed by removing the cause, supporting the patient and giving methylene blue. Only the inherited haemoglobin M variant fails to respond.

The trap

Stop oxygen to prevent CO2 retention. Stopping oxygen is tempting because a drowsy patient on two high-flow sources suggests oxygen-induced carbon dioxide retention. But the blue colour comes from methaemoglobin, which no amount of inspired oxygen reverses. Removing oxygen takes away supportive care without treating the cause. The patient needs the specific antidote.

Evidence

Oxidising chemicals can cause life-threatening acquired methaemoglobinaemia. Suspect it when oxygen delivery fails despite adequate arterial oxygen. Withdraw the agent, give supportive care; once co-oximetry confirms, first-choice methylene blue 1 to 2 mg/kg over 3 to 5 minutes.

Sources: Stoelting 8eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man on dapsone remains blue despite high-flow oxygen. Likely cause and confirming test?

Methaemoglobinaemia; confirm by co-oximetry.

Treatment for dapsone-induced methaemoglobinaemia in a 70 kg man with normal G6PD?

Stop dapsone; methylene blue 1 to 2 mg/kg.

Report a problem with entry 23: Dapsone methaemoglobinaemia: cyanosis despite oxygen, give methylene blue

Part 1024 / 129

G6PD deficiency: methylene blue is contraindicated

In G6PD deficiency, never give methylene blue, even for methaemoglobinaemia. It will not reverse the methaemoglobin and can cause fatal haemolysis.

Why

Methylene blue is the usual antidote for methaemoglobinaemia. In G6PD-deficient patients it does not work, and it is also on the list of drugs that provoke haemolysis. The patient's oxygen delivery is already reduced by methaemoglobin. Giving methylene blue fails to fix that and adds red-cell destruction, which can be lethal. Ordinary anaesthetic drugs are not oxidant triggers in the same way, so the ban applies to the antidote, not to routine sedatives or analgesics.

The trap

Codeine is contraindicated in G6PD. Codeine is tempting because some analgesics, such as high-dose aspirin, appear on haemolysis lists, so it seems plausible that another analgesic would be banned too. It is wrong because codeine is named outright as safe in G6PD deficiency, along with ketamine and midazolam.

Evidence

Methylene blue is ineffective in G6PD deficiency and may be fatal; it is potentially life-threatening when methaemoglobinaemia coexists, and haematology tables list it as causing haemolysis. Midazolam, codeine and ketamine are safe.

Sources: Mayo reviewStoelting 8eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A G6PD-deficient patient develops methaemoglobinaemia. Do you give methylene blue?

No; it fails and can cause fatal haemolysis.

Is codeine barred in a patient with G6PD deficiency?

No; codeine is named safe, as are ketamine and midazolam.

Common misconception That analgesics such as codeine are banned in G6PD deficiency

Report a problem with entry 24: G6PD deficiency: methylene blue is contraindicated

Back to card 4Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsRelaxant choice: give, avoid, prevent

  1. 025Succinylcholine contraindications: myotonic dystrophy and other myopathies
  2. 026Burns: succinylcholine is safe only in the first 24 hours; hyperkalaemia risk from about 48 hours, peaking at 7-10 days and lasting months; resistance to non-depolarisers
  3. 027Prolonged block after an esterase-metabolised drug: avoid mivacurium
  4. 028Block needed again soon after sugammadex: succinylcholine or a benzylisoquinolinium; standard-dose rocuronium waits 4 hours, 1.2 mg/kg is label-permitted from 5 minutes
  5. 029Succinylcholine raises intraocular pressure briefly, peaking at 2-4 minutes; an open globe is the only flagged case
  6. 030Remifentanil at induction prevents the intraocular pressure rise after succinylcholine and intubation
  7. 031Succinylcholine bradycardia: children and a repeated dose
  8. 032Succinylcholine myalgia prophylaxis: an NSAID is most effective (Barash); rocuronium pretreatment also reduces it (Miller); a smaller succinylcholine dose does not
Part 1025 / 129

Succinylcholine contraindications: myotonic dystrophy and other myopathies

Avoid suxamethonium in myotonic dystrophy and other myopathies. Myasthenia gravis is not a contraindication, because these patients resist suxamethonium.

Why

Suxamethonium depolarises the muscle and causes fasciculation. In myotonic disorders this sets off a sustained contracture inside the muscle. Deeper anaesthesia or a nondepolarising blocker cannot release it, and the spasm may stop ventilation. In other myopathies it can cause rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalaemic arrest. Stoelting says to avoid it outright. Faust limits the contraindication to severe disease and says it has no malignant hyperthermia link. Avoiding it is safe under both views. Myasthenia is the opposite: resistance and a tendency to phase II block.

The trap

Myasthenia gravis is a contraindication. Myasthenia gravis is a neuromuscular disease, so it looks like a suxamethonium contraindication. In fact these patients resist suxamethonium and tend towards phase II block. The issue is changed dosing and duration, not an uncontrollable contracture or hyperkalaemia.

Evidence

Stoelting advises against suxamethonium in myotonic dystrophy because the myotonia it provokes cannot be reversed by anaesthesia or nondepolarising relaxants. Faust calls it possibly contraindicated in severe disease. Barash avoids it in any suspected myopathy. Myasthenia shows resistance and phase II block.

Sources: Stoelting 8eBarash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 35-year-old with myotonic dystrophy needs a rapid sequence induction. Which relaxant do you avoid?

Suxamethonium; it can cause an unrelievable contracture.

Does myasthenia gravis contraindicate suxamethonium?

No; these patients are resistant to it.

Common misconception That myasthenia gravis contraindicates suxamethonium

Report a problem with entry 25: Succinylcholine contraindications: myotonic dystrophy and other myopathies

Part 1026 / 129

Burns: succinylcholine is safe only in the first 24 hours; hyperkalaemia risk from about 48 hours, peaking at 7-10 days and lasting months; resistance to non-depolarisers

Burns: succinylcholine safe within 24 hours; afterwards hyperkalaemia risk climbs, peaking at 7–10 days. In children, a single dose can cause bradycardia.

Why

Burns, like denervation and immobility, make acetylcholine receptors multiply across the muscle membrane. Succinylcholine depolarises all of them and releases potassium that can stop the heart. This multiplication takes days, so the first day is safe and risk rises after. The extra receptors also bind non-depolarisers, so resistance tracks burn size and time since injury. Children's vagal response lets a single dose slow the heart, hence atropine pretreatment. If the burn's age is not given, bradycardia in a child is true regardless; hyperkalaemia applies once past the first day.

The trap

Succinylcholine best intubating drug for burns. Succinylcholine is the classic rapid-sequence drug, so people assume it gives better intubating conditions. It does not beat high-dose rocuronium, which the burns literature names the drug of choice when rapid paralysis is needed and succinylcholine is contraindicated.

Evidence

The first 24 hours after a burn are deemed safe; hyperkalaemia risk may start by 2 days and peaks at 7 to 10 days. A single dose can cause bradycardia, mainly in the very young. Non-depolariser resistance tracks burn size and time; rocuronium is preferred.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man burnt 10 hours ago needs urgent intubation. Is succinylcholine safe?

Yes; it is safe within the first 24 hours.

Nine days after a 40% burn, why avoid succinylcholine?

Hyperkalaemia; the risk peaks at 7–10 days.

Report a problem with entry 26: Burns: succinylcholine is safe only in the first 24 hours; hyperkalaemia risk from about 48 hours, peaking at 7-10 days and lasting months; resistance to non-depolarisers

Part 1027 / 129

Prolonged block after an esterase-metabolised drug: avoid mivacurium

Prolonged recovery after an esterase-cleared drug suggests plasma cholinesterase deficiency. Avoid mivacurium and suxamethonium, and choose a relaxant that does not depend on that enzyme.

Why

Plasma cholinesterase, also called butyrylcholinesterase, is made in the liver. It hydrolyses suxamethonium, mivacurium and the ester local anaesthetics. Mivacurium is short-acting only because this enzyme clears it so fast. If a patient carries an atypical form of the enzyme, especially two copies, that clearance fails. The block can then last for hours instead of minutes. A past episode of slow waking after an ester-cleared drug marks the patient as at risk, so drugs from this pathway should not be given again.

The trap

Cisatracurium prolonged by esterase deficiency. Cisatracurium sounds like the answer because the atracurium family is partly broken down by ester hydrolysis, so people link it to esterases. That hydrolysis is not done by plasma cholinesterase, and Hofmann elimination does most of the work. Enzyme deficiency therefore does not prolong its block.

Evidence

Plasma cholinesterase breaks down suxamethonium, mivacurium and ester local anaesthetics. The main anaesthetic danger of deficiency is prolonged apnoea after either relaxant. Mivacurium is short-acting because the enzyme clears it rapidly, but patients homozygous for the atypical enzyme can stay blocked for several hours.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient once woke very slowly after suxamethonium. Which short-acting non-depolariser should you avoid now?

Mivacurium; it depends on plasma cholinesterase.

Will plasma cholinesterase deficiency prolong cisatracurium block?

No; Hofmann elimination clears most of it.

Common misconception That cisatracurium depends on plasma cholinesterase

Report a problem with entry 27: Prolonged block after an esterase-metabolised drug: avoid mivacurium

Part 1028 / 129

Block needed again soon after sugammadex: succinylcholine or a benzylisoquinolinium; standard-dose rocuronium waits 4 hours, 1.2 mg/kg is label-permitted from 5 minutes

After sugammadex, urgent re-intubation: succinylcholine; non-urgent re-paralysis: a benzylisoquinolinium. Standard-dose steroidal relaxants wait 4 hours; rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg allowed from 5 minutes.

Why

Sugammadex encapsulates only steroidal relaxants, so molecules still circulating can trap fresh rocuronium or vecuronium; succinylcholine and benzylisoquinolinium drugs escape it. Barash offers either; Mayo notes succinylcholine is essentially unaffected, which suits an urgent, full-stomach rapid sequence. Miller is most conservative, advising a benzylisoquinolinium such as cisatracurium for 24 hours to cover the longest clearance. The US label is most permissive: standard steroidal doses after 4 hours, or rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg from 5 minutes, accepting onset delayed by up to about 4 minutes. So urgency decides the drug.

The trap

Vecuronium safe alternative after sugammadex. Vecuronium looks like a neutral alternative to repeating rocuronium, since it is a different familiar relaxant. It is still steroidal, so residual sugammadex binds it; at standard dose it must wait 4 hours, and the label offers no early high-dose route for it.

Evidence

Barash offers succinylcholine or a benzylisoquinolinium; Mayo says succinylcholine is unlikely to be affected; Miller conservatively advises a benzylisoquinolinium within 24 hours; the US label permits rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg from 5 minutes, standard steroidal doses after 4 hours, onset delayed up to about 4 minutes.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eOutside our books: BRIDION (sugammadex) injection, US prescribing information: sections 2, 5 and 12 (2015)Mayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Thirty minutes after sugammadex, a patient with a full stomach needs urgent re-intubation. Which relaxant?

Succinylcholine.

One hour after sugammadex, non-urgent re-paralysis is needed. Why not vecuronium?

Residual sugammadex binds it; standard steroidal doses wait 4 hours.

Common misconception That vecuronium escapes residual sugammadex

Report a problem with entry 28: Block needed again soon after sugammadex: succinylcholine or a benzylisoquinolinium; standard-dose rocuronium waits 4 hours, 1.2 mg/kg is label-permitted from 5 minutes

Part 1029 / 129

Succinylcholine raises intraocular pressure briefly, peaking at 2-4 minutes; an open globe is the only flagged case

Succinylcholine raises IOP briefly, peaking at 2 to 4 minutes; intact globes, glaucoma included, are no bar; open globe only under deep, fully blocked RSI.

Why

Pressure rises within 1 minute, peaks at 2 to 4 minutes and resolves by 6 minutes. The cause is not fully understood; contraction of tonic extraocular muscle fibres, brief choroidal vasodilatation, or both, are thought responsible. Being brief, it does not threaten an intact eye, even with glaucoma. Miller cautions only against an open anterior chamber. Barash accepts it in open-eye injury, provided anaesthesia is deep and block is complete. Coughing or straining at laryngoscopy raises pressure significantly.

The trap

Glaucoma as a contraindication. Raised intraocular pressure in a patient with uncontrolled glaucoma feels like an obvious bar. It is not. The rise is brief and harmless to an intact globe. Only an open globe was ever flagged, and even that is now accepted within a controlled rapid sequence induction.

Evidence

Miller: the rise starts within a minute, peaks at 2 to 4 minutes, and is gone by 6; mechanism muscular and/or choroidal vascular; only an open anterior chamber bars it. Barash accepts it in open-eye injury when adequate anaesthesia and block prevent coughing.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 70-year-old with uncontrolled glaucoma but an intact globe needs RSI. Is succinylcholine barred, and when does intraocular pressure peak?

No; the rise is brief, peaking at 2 to 4 minutes.

Common misconception That glaucoma contraindicates succinylcholine

A 24-year-old has an open globe injury needing RSI. Under what conditions is succinylcholine acceptable?

Deep anaesthesia and complete block, avoiding coughing or straining.

Report a problem with entry 29: Succinylcholine raises intraocular pressure briefly, peaking at 2-4 minutes; an open globe is the only flagged case

Part 1030 / 129

Remifentanil at induction prevents the intraocular pressure rise after succinylcholine and intubation

When succinylcholine is used, give remifentanil 1 mcg/kg with the induction agent to stop intraocular pressure rising at succinylcholine and intubation. Fentanyl lowers it less.

Why

Succinylcholine raises intraocular pressure because tonic myofibrils in the extraocular muscles contract and choroidal vessels briefly dilate. Tracheal intubation adds its own rise. Anaesthetic drugs, opioids included, lower intraocular pressure by depressing the central ocular centres, which relaxes extraocular muscle tone. Remifentanil given with propofol or thiopental adds enough of this central depression to offset both causes of the rise. Fentanyl lowers the pressure too, but in comparative data the fall was smaller.

The trap

Fentanyl prevents IOP rise after intubation. Fentanyl is the usual induction opioid and does lower intraocular pressure at induction, so it looks like a safe pick. But the evidence for preventing the rise after succinylcholine and intubation is for remifentanil. In a direct comparison, fentanyl lowered the pressure less.

Evidence

Remifentanil 1 mcg/kg, given with propofol or thiopental, was reported to prevent the pressure change after succinylcholine and intubation. In non-ophthalmic surgery, pressure fell from 13.6 to 7.1 mm Hg with remifentanil and from 13.7 to 9.7 with fentanyl.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which opioid given with induction prevents the eye pressure rise from succinylcholine and intubation?

Remifentanil 1 mcg/kg.

Compared with remifentanil, how well does fentanyl blunt the intraocular pressure rise at induction?

Less well; it lowers the pressure less.

Common misconception That fentanyl prevents the rise as well as remifentanil

Report a problem with entry 30: Remifentanil at induction prevents the intraocular pressure rise after succinylcholine and intubation

Part 1031 / 129

Succinylcholine bradycardia: children and a repeated dose

Expect bradycardia after succinylcholine in young children, even after one dose, and in any patient after a repeat dose. Atropine pretreatment reduces it.

Why

Succinylcholine resembles acetylcholine and acts on the autonomic pathways to the sinus node. Children have high resting vagal tone, so even the first dose can slow the heart. Adults have less vagal tone and more often become tachycardic with the first dose. A second dose given soon after the first adds its breakdown products, succinylmonocholine and choline. These stimulate the same receptors further and can cause sinus bradycardia, junctional rhythm or arrest. An anticholinergic given beforehand blunts this. Overall, the most frequent effects are fasciculations, followed by postoperative myalgia.

The trap

Large propofol dose causes this bradycardia. A large induction dose of propofol can lower heart rate, but the infant's high vagal tone, the repeat dose of relaxant and the response to atropine point instead to the muscarinic effect of succinylcholine and its metabolites.

Evidence

Succinylcholine can cause bradycardia or asystole. The risk is higher in children and after repeat doses, where accumulated metabolites are blamed, and anticholinergic pretreatment lowers it. Fasciculations occur in 80% to 90% of patients and myalgias in 50% to 60%.

Sources: Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 2-year-old becomes bradycardic after a first dose of succinylcholine. Why?

High vagal tone; succinylcholine stimulates muscarinic pathways.

An adult needs a second succinylcholine dose five minutes after the first. What risk, and what prevents it?

Bradycardia; atropine pretreatment reduces it.

Report a problem with entry 31: Succinylcholine bradycardia: children and a repeated dose

Part 1032 / 129

Succinylcholine myalgia prophylaxis: an NSAID is most effective (Barash); rocuronium pretreatment also reduces it (Miller); a smaller succinylcholine dose does not

To prevent succinylcholine myalgia, give an NSAID beforehand, the most effective option; rocuronium pretreatment also helps, but lowering the succinylcholine dose does not.

Why

The sources do not conflict: they rank the options. Barash rates NSAID pretreatment best: about one case is prevented for every 2.5 patients treated. Miller shows that rocuronium pretreatment cut myalgia well below placebo. Faust agrees that a small defasciculating dose of a non-depolariser works, but warns it can cause double vision, ptosis, dysphagia and breathing difficulty. Dose works against intuition: bigger succinylcholine doses, not smaller ones, were tied to less myalgia. If only one answer is allowed, choose the NSAID.

The trap

Reduce succinylcholine dose to prevent myalgia. Cutting the dose seems logical: less drug should mean fewer fasciculations and less pain. The evidence points the other way. Larger succinylcholine doses were associated with less myalgia, so reducing the dose gives no protection.

Evidence

Barash names NSAID pretreatment as the most effective prophylaxis. Miller found rocuronium pretreatment clearly reduced myalgia compared with vecuronium and placebo. Faust lists larger succinylcholine doses, lidocaine, NSAIDs and a defasciculating non-depolariser as reducing it, and warns of weakness-type side effects.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is the most effective pretreatment against succinylcholine myalgia?

An NSAID given beforehand.

Will lowering the succinylcholine dose prevent postoperative myalgia?

No; dose reduction does not protect. Pretreat with rocuronium or an NSAID.

Common misconception That a smaller dose means less myalgia

Report a problem with entry 32: Succinylcholine myalgia prophylaxis: an NSAID is most effective (Barash); rocuronium pretreatment also reduces it (Miller); a smaller succinylcholine dose does not

Back to card 5Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsAntiemetic choice

  1. 033Nausea in Parkinson's disease: ondansetron, never a dopamine antagonist
  2. 034Long QT: avoid droperidol
  3. 035Dopamine antagonists such as droperidol act on the chemoreceptor trigger zone
Part 1033 / 129

Nausea in Parkinson's disease: ondansetron, never a dopamine antagonist

In Parkinson's disease, treat postoperative nausea with ondansetron. Avoid every dopamine-blocking antiemetic: metoclopramide, droperidol, haloperidol, promethazine and thiethylperazine.

Why

Parkinson's disease is a loss of dopamine signalling in the extrapyramidal motor system. Treatment works by restoring that signalling. Any antiemetic that blocks dopamine receptors in the brain works against this. It can bring on or worsen rigidity, slowness of movement and tremor. Ondansetron controls nausea by blocking serotonin receptors, not dopamine receptors, so it spares the extrapyramidal pathway.

The trap

Promethazine lacks dopamine-blocking effects. Promethazine is usually thought of as a sedating antihistamine, so it looks safe from dopamine side effects. It also blocks dopamine receptors. The sources list it with droperidol as a drug that causes extrapyramidal effects, so it is contraindicated in Parkinson's disease.

Evidence

Drugs that block dopamine should be avoided in Parkinson's disease because they cause extrapyramidal effects. The sources name droperidol, promethazine, thiethylperazine and metoclopramide, and list haloperidol in the same dopamine-blocking group. Ondansetron is the preferred antiemetic.

Sources: Mayo reviewFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Postoperative nausea troubles a 69-year-old on levodopa for parkinsonism. Safest antiemetic?

Ondansetron, a serotonin antagonist.

Is promethazine acceptable for nausea in Parkinson's disease?

No; it blocks dopamine receptors.

Common misconception That promethazine is only an antihistamine and safe in Parkinson's

Report a problem with entry 33: Nausea in Parkinson's disease: ondansetron, never a dopamine antagonist

Part 1034 / 129

Long QT: avoid droperidol

Prolonged QT, especially with syncope: avoid droperidol. It lengthens QT further, risking torsades.

Why

Droperidol acts like most antipsychotics. It slows how heart muscle repolarises. That lengthens the QT interval. In a heart already slow to repolarise, the extra delay can set off torsades de pointes. The risk seems to grow with dose. Fainting spells with a long QT suggest arrhythmia is already happening. So this patient faces the most added danger. Regulators responded with warnings. Some countries withdrew the drug. In the US it is now used only against sickness after surgery.

The trap

Morphine prolongs QT interval. Morphine can seem risky in a child who has fainted. But it is not an antipsychotic. The texts link delayed repolarisation and torsades to droperidol only. Nothing here names morphine as the drug to avoid.

Evidence

Droperidol can lengthen QT by slowing repolarisation. It may trigger torsades de pointes. The effect seems dose dependent. An FDA warning followed in 2001. Several countries withdrew it. The US gives it a black box warning.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 14-year-old with long QT and fainting episodes needs nausea prophylaxis. Which antiemetic do you avoid?

Droperidol; it risks torsades.

How does droperidol endanger a patient whose QT is already long?

It delays repolarisation, lengthening QT further.

Report a problem with entry 34: Long QT: avoid droperidol

Part 1035 / 129

Dopamine antagonists such as droperidol act on the chemoreceptor trigger zone

An antiemetic works at the chemoreceptor trigger zone by blocking its receptors. Droperidol, a D2 antagonist, is the classic example. Dopamine itself stimulates the zone.

Why

The chemoreceptor trigger zone in the medulla carries opioid, serotonin 5HT3, histamine, D2 and muscarinic receptors. Dopamine acting on this zone causes nausea and vomiting. Blocking its D2 receptors with a butyrophenone such as droperidol or haloperidol stops that drive. Metoclopramide belongs to the same D2-antagonist class, and 5HT3 antagonists also bind in the zone. The deciding feature is antagonism: the natural transmitter or an agonist excites the zone and causes emesis, while the drug that blocks the receptor is the antiemetic.

The trap

Dopamine blocks the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Dopamine is tempting because it really does act on the trigger zone, and the concept is built around dopamine. But dopamine stimulates the zone and causes vomiting. The antiemetic is the drug that blocks dopamine's D2 receptors, such as droperidol.

Evidence

The texts say that central dopamine stimulates the medullary trigger zone and causes vomiting, and that haloperidol and droperidol counter this. The zone holds 5HT3, histamine, D2 and other receptors. 5HT3 antagonists bind there too, and metoclopramide is grouped with the D2 antagonists.

Sources: Barash 9eFaustMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which receptor does droperidol block in the chemoreceptor trigger zone?

Dopamine D2.

Is dopamine at the medullary trigger zone emetic or antiemetic?

Emetic; blocking its D2 receptors is what stops vomiting.

Common misconception That dopamine itself is antiemetic at the trigger zone

Report a problem with entry 35: Dopamine antagonists such as droperidol act on the chemoreceptor trigger zone

Back to card 6Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsDrug for the job

  1. 036Dexmedetomidine's main use is sedation of ventilated ICU patients
  2. 037Postoperative shivering: meperidine 12.5-25 mg IV is most used; ondansetron, clonidine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine and tramadol also work
  3. 038Glucagon relaxes the duodenum for ERCP
  4. 039Migraine prophylaxis when a beta-blocker is contraindicated: valproate or topiramate
  5. 040Succinylcholine for ECT prevents fractures and injury from the convulsion
  6. 041A seizure too short at ECT: replace propofol with etomidate
  7. 042Midazolam has the shortest half-life of the common benzodiazepines
  8. 043Thiopental and propofol lower cerebral metabolic rate the most
  9. 044Scopolamine is the most sedating and amnesic antimuscarinic, with more mydriasis than atropine
  10. 045Glycopyrrolate is the most potent antisialagogue
  11. 046Fentanyl barely changes urine output; volatile agents such as halothane reduce it
  12. 047Among injectable steroids, betamethasone has the greatest anti-inflammatory potency
Part 1036 / 129

Dexmedetomidine's main use is sedation of ventilated ICU patients

Dexmedetomidine's licensed, core indication is short-term sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care. Procedural sedation and adjunct analgesia are secondary extensions of that role.

Why

It is a highly selective alpha-two agonist. It gives sedation that is calm, sleep-like and easy to rouse, together with anxiolysis, some analgesia and sympatholysis, while barely depressing breathing. That profile suits a ventilated patient who needs to stay settled, cooperative and ready for weaning. In a trial against lorazepam it gave more days free of delirium or coma and more time at the target sedation level. Because it spares breathing, its use later spread to procedures and the operating theatre, but these grew out of the intensive care role.

The trap

Dexmedetomidine used as general anaesthetic. This is tempting because dexmedetomidine is famous for preserving spontaneous breathing. That property makes it useful for procedural sedation. It is still used as a sedative, though, not as a general anaesthetic, and its licensed main use remains sedation of ventilated intensive care patients.

Evidence

Miller states it was approved only for short-term (<24 hours) sedation of ventilated adult ICU patients, with other settings added later. Barash places ICU sedation of ventilated patients first among its key uses and stresses minimal respiratory depression.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is dexmedetomidine's licensed core indication?

Short-term sedation of ventilated adults in intensive care.

Because it spares breathing, is dexmedetomidine used as a general anaesthetic with spontaneous ventilation?

No; it is a sedative, mainly for ventilated ICU patients.

Common misconception That preserved breathing makes it a general anaesthetic

Report a problem with entry 36: Dexmedetomidine's main use is sedation of ventilated ICU patients

Part 1037 / 129

Postoperative shivering: meperidine 12.5-25 mg IV is most used; ondansetron, clonidine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine and tramadol also work

Treat postoperative shivering by actively warming hypothermic patients and giving IV pethidine 12.5–25 mg in adults; ondansetron, clonidine, ketamine, tramadol and dexmedetomidine also work.

Why

Shivering usually comes with postoperative hypothermia. Forced-air warming corrects the low temperature, and drugs damp down the shivering response itself. Pethidine is the usual adult choice. Several non-opioid drugs also suppress shivering: ondansetron, clonidine and ketamine, plus dexmedetomidine given as an intraoperative infusion to prevent it. Tramadol worked as well as pethidine in parturients shivering after epidural anaesthesia. Not all shivering is caused by cold: remifentanil increases postanaesthetic shivering whether or not the patient became hypothermic during surgery.

The trap

Midazolam, because it settles shaking. Midazolam tempts because it settles a restless, shaking patient in recovery. But it is not on the textbook list of antishivering drugs, and unlike propofol or alfentanil it barely shifts the thermoregulatory thresholds; small trials show a modest preventive effect. Ondansetron is on that list, with opioids, clonidine and ketamine.

Evidence

Opioids, ondansetron, clonidine and ketamine all prevent or treat shivering, and pethidine 12.5–25 mg IV is the commonest adult choice. An intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion works as prevention. Tramadol matched pethidine after epidural anaesthesia in parturients. Remifentanil causes shivering unrelated to hypothermia.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A hypothermic 45-year-old shivers in recovery. Besides forced-air warming, which IV drug and adult dose is most commonly used?

Pethidine (meperidine) 12.5-25 mg IV.

Which is the odd one out for treating postoperative shivering: ondansetron, clonidine, ketamine or midazolam?

The odd one out · Midazolam; it barely shifts thermoregulatory thresholds.

Common misconception That midazolam is a standard antishivering drug

Report a problem with entry 37: Postoperative shivering: meperidine 12.5-25 mg IV is most used; ondansetron, clonidine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine and tramadol also work

Part 1038 / 129

Glucagon relaxes the duodenum for ERCP

When a hyperactive duodenum hinders ERCP cannulation, give an antispasmodic. Glucagon is the usual choice; IV hyoscyamine is the alternative.

Why

To cannulate the papilla, the endoscopist needs a still duodenal wall. Spasm and peristalsis keep moving the target. Antispasmodics relax the smooth muscle of the duodenum, which quietens the bowel and gives the endoscopist better working conditions. Glucagon is the standard agent. Hyoscyamine works the same way through an anticholinergic effect. Both can speed the heart, so expect sinus tachycardia after giving them and do not mistake it for light anaesthesia or hypovolaemia.

The trap

Metoclopramide relaxes duodenum for ERCP. Metoclopramide is a familiar gut drug, so it looks like the right kind of answer when the problem is duodenal motility. But it is a prokinetic. It increases upper gut motility and would make the duodenum harder to cannulate. The procedure needs the gut relaxed, not stimulated.

Evidence

Endoscopists often give antispasmodics such as glucagon or intravenous hyoscyamine to damp duodenal motility and improve conditions during the procedure. Sinus tachycardia is a recognised side effect.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During ERCP, duodenal spasm prevents cannulation. Which drug relaxes it?

Glucagon; IV hyoscyamine is the alternative.

Why is metoclopramide wrong for a restless duodenum at ERCP?

It is prokinetic and increases upper gut motility.

Common misconception That any gut-motility drug will still the duodenum

Report a problem with entry 38: Glucagon relaxes the duodenum for ERCP

Part 1039 / 129

Migraine prophylaxis when a beta-blocker is contraindicated: valproate or topiramate

Asthma bars non-selective beta-blockers for migraine prevention; use an antiepileptic, as topiramate equals valproate, preferring topiramate with contraception in women able to conceive.

Why

Propranolol blocks beta-one and beta-two receptors. Losing beta-two bronchodilation can provoke bronchospasm in asthma and blunts salbutamol, so the airway disease decides the choice. Caution for conduction starts only beyond first-degree block. Antiepileptics avoid both problems, and valproate and topiramate prevent migraine about equally. Valproate is teratogenic and harms neurodevelopment, so regulators contraindicate it in women able to conceive unless a pregnancy prevention programme is followed. Topiramate also needs contraception but is safer for them. Where valproate is the only antiepileptic available, it is still the right class.

The trap

Propranolol as standard beta-blocker. Propranolol is the standard beta-blocker for migraine prevention, so it is the reflex pick. But it is non-selective, and blocking beta-two receptors can trigger dangerous bronchospasm in an asthmatic who relies on inhaled bronchodilators. Asthma therefore rules it out.

Evidence

Beta-blockers have an established role in preventing migraine, but non-selective agents need caution in obstructive airway disease, heart failure and conduction block beyond first degree. Oral valproate is widely used to prevent migraine, and topiramate works about as well as divalproex.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 29-year-old asthmatic using salbutamol needs migraine prevention. Why is propranolol unsuitable, and what class replaces it?

Non-selective beta-blockade risks bronchospasm; use an antiepileptic.

Common misconception That propranolol is the default regardless of asthma

A woman of 31 who could conceive has asthma and frequent migraine. Valproate or topiramate, and what must accompany it?

Topiramate, with contraception; valproate is teratogenic.

Report a problem with entry 39: Migraine prophylaxis when a beta-blocker is contraindicated: valproate or topiramate

Part 1040 / 129

Succinylcholine for ECT prevents fractures and injury from the convulsion

Give suxamethonium in ECT to soften the convulsive muscle contractions, preventing fractures and dislocations; the bite block, not the relaxant, protects teeth and tongue.

Why

The electrical stimulus sets off a generalised tonic–clonic seizure. The violent contraction of skeletal muscle during that seizure can break bones or dislocate joints. Suxamethonium given straight after the induction agent acts at the neuromuscular junction and blunts those contractions. It does nothing to the brain's seizure threshold. The teeth and tongue need a separate measure, a soft bite block placed for the seizure. So the relaxant is there to prevent orthopaedic injury, not oral injury.

The trap

Succinylcholine prevents tongue and dental injury. Tongue and dental injury during the fit is real and easy to picture, so it feels like the reason for paralysis. But the texts give that job to a soft bite block. The relaxant is listed for fractures and dislocations.

Evidence

One text says suxamethonium given right after induction is meant to blunt dangerous seizure contractions and the fractures they cause. Another says it prevents musculoskeletal injury. A third lists fractures and dislocations as the relaxant's target, with a soft bite block for teeth and tongue.

Sources: Stoelting 8eBarash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Why is suxamethonium given for electroconvulsive therapy?

To soften the convulsion and prevent fractures and dislocations.

What protects the teeth and tongue during an ECT seizure?

A soft bite block, not the relaxant.

Common misconception That paralysis is given to prevent tongue biting

Report a problem with entry 40: Succinylcholine for ECT prevents fractures and injury from the convulsion

Part 1041 / 129

A seizure too short at ECT: replace propofol with etomidate

If an ECT seizure is inadequate under propofol, switch the induction agent to etomidate, which does not suppress seizures in proportion to dose.

Why

Propofol raises the seizure threshold, so the seizure triggered by the electrical stimulus is shorter. With propofol or methohexital, this suppression deepens as the dose rises. Etomidate behaves differently: at usual induction doses, 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg, it shows no dose-related inhibition and gives longer, better-quality seizures. Faust rejects propofol for ECT outright. Stoelting accepts it as an alternative that blunts the haemodynamic response. The two fit together: propofol suits many patients, but once a seizure proves inadequate, change to etomidate.

The trap

Increase propofol to prolong seizure. More propofol can look like simply deepening the anaesthetic to get a cleaner treatment. It fails because propofol's anticonvulsant effect grows with the dose. A bigger dose suppresses the seizure further and shortens it again. The fix is to change the hypnotic, not to give more of it.

Evidence

Propofol's anticonvulsant action shortens ECT seizures, while etomidate improves both how long they last and their quality. Across 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg, etomidate does not inhibit seizures in proportion to dose, unlike propofol or methohexital. Propofol raises the seizure threshold.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Under propofol, an ECT seizure is too brief to be therapeutic. What do you change?

Switch the induction agent to etomidate.

Would a larger propofol dose lengthen an inadequate ECT seizure?

No; propofol suppresses seizures more as dose rises.

Common misconception That more propofol improves seizure quality

Report a problem with entry 41: A seizure too short at ECT: replace propofol with etomidate

Part 1042 / 129

Midazolam has the shortest half-life of the common benzodiazepines

For the common benzodiazepine with the briefest elimination half-life, choose midazolam. Lorazepam and alprazolam last several times longer.

Why

Elimination half-life is how fast the plasma level falls once distribution is complete. It sets how long sedation lasts after a dose. Midazolam's is short. That, plus fewer drug interactions, makes it the preferred benzodiazepine for premedication and procedural anxiolysis. Do not confuse it with equilibration half-time, which is the delay before the drug reaches its site of action and controls onset. For midazolam this is about 0.9 minutes, so leave a few minutes between repeat doses.

The trap

Alprazolam is shortest-acting benzodiazepine. Alprazolam is prescribed for anxiety and is often called short-acting, so it seems to fit an anxious-patient question. But its half-life is several times midazolam's and close to lorazepam's. Being a good anxiolytic does not make it the shortest-acting.

Evidence

A comparison table gives midazolam a half-life of 2.5, against 8.8 for temazepam, 11.2–16.3 for alprazolam and 14 for lorazepam. Its short elimination half-life and fewer interactions make it the benzodiazepine of choice for procedural anxiolysis.

Sources: FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Of midazolam, lorazepam and alprazolam, which is eliminated fastest?

Midazolam.

Is alprazolam shorter-acting than midazolam?

No; its half-life is several times longer.

Common misconception That alprazolam is the shortest-acting benzodiazepine

Report a problem with entry 42: Midazolam has the shortest half-life of the common benzodiazepines

Part 1043 / 129

Thiopental and propofol lower cerebral metabolic rate the most

Thiopental or propofol gives the biggest CMR fall: both reach EEG burst suppression, cutting CMR about 60%. Opioids and sedative-dose benzodiazepines lower it only slightly.

Why

These hypnotics reduce neuronal electrical activity more as the dose rises. Once the EEG reaches burst suppression, brain oxygen use has fallen by about 60%. Flow–metabolism coupling stays intact, so cerebral blood flow falls with it. Any drug that can produce burst suppression reaches the same ceiling, so thiopental and propofol are equal at maximal dose. Opioids hardly change cerebral metabolism. Benzodiazepines cause a significant fall only at doses that induce general anaesthesia.

The trap

Midazolam lowers cerebral metabolic rate. Midazolam is a GABA-ergic hypnotic that does lower cerebral flow and metabolism as the dose rises, so it looks like a peer of propofol. At sedative doses the effect is minor, and it is not among the drugs described as driving the EEG to burst suppression.

Evidence

Barbiturates, etomidate and propofol can produce EEG burst suppression, reducing cerebral metabolism by roughly 60% with matching falls in blood flow. Opioids cause only minor falls. Benzodiazepines have little effect at sedative doses, significant only at anaesthetic doses.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which induction agents give the largest fall in cerebral metabolic rate?

Thiopental or propofol, about 60% at burst suppression.

Does a sedative dose of midazolam cut cerebral metabolism as much as propofol?

No; sedative doses have only a minor effect.

Common misconception That midazolam matches propofol in lowering cerebral metabolism

Report a problem with entry 43: Thiopental and propofol lower cerebral metabolic rate the most

Part 1044 / 129

Scopolamine is the most sedating and amnesic antimuscarinic, with more mydriasis than atropine

For mydriasis and sedation, rank the antimuscarinics scopolamine first, then atropine. Glycopyrrolate gives no sedation. For heart rate, atropine is the strongest.

Why

An antimuscarinic has central effects, such as sedation or the central anticholinergic syndrome, only if it crosses the blood-brain barrier. Scopolamine crosses most readily, atropine less so, and glycopyrrolate does not cross, so it neither sedates nor causes the central syndrome. The eye follows the same order. Scopolamine dilates the pupil and paralyses accommodation more than atropine does, especially when put on the eye. Each drug has a different profile: atropine is the stronger blocker at the heart, and scopolamine is stronger for sedation and the eye.

The trap

Atropine most sedating antimuscarinic. Atropine is the standard antimuscarinic and the textbook cause of dilated pupils, so people pick it by reflex. Its strength is blocking the heart's muscarinic receptors. For the eye, and for sedation, scopolamine has the greater effect, so atropine is not the best answer.

Evidence

Both atropine and scopolamine affect the eye, dilating the pupil and paralysing accommodation. Scopolamine does this more strongly. Sedation needs the drug to enter the brain, so it is marked with scopolamine, weaker with atropine and absent with glycopyrrolate. Atropine is the best cardiac blocker.

Sources: Mayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which antimuscarinic gives the most sedation and pupil dilation?

Scopolamine, then atropine.

Which antimuscarinic is strongest at raising heart rate?

Atropine.

Report a problem with entry 44: Scopolamine is the most sedating and amnesic antimuscarinic, with more mydriasis than atropine

Part 1045 / 129

Glycopyrrolate is the most potent antisialagogue

For the strongest drying of secretions, give glycopyrrolate. It beats both atropine and scopolamine as an antisialagogue and causes less tachycardia than atropine.

Why

Atropine, scopolamine and glycopyrrolate all block muscarinic receptors on salivary and airway glands. None of them favours a particular receptor subtype, so they differ mainly in potency and in how strongly they act on the heart. Glycopyrrolate gives the deepest and longest-lasting drying of the three, and it raises heart rate less than atropine. This makes it the drug of choice when a dry airway is the aim, for example before fibreoptic intubation.

The trap

Scopolamine most potent antisialagogue. Scopolamine is famous as a powerful anticholinergic that also sedates, so it feels like the heavyweight choice. But the sources rank glycopyrrolate above both atropine and scopolamine for drying potency, and its drying effect also lasts longer.

Evidence

Barash calls glycopyrrolate the most potent antisialagogue, with less tachycardia than atropine, and says drying for fibreoptic intubation is a major indication. Faust ranks it above atropine and scopolamine, with drying lasting up to 7 h.

Sources: Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Before awake fibreoptic intubation, which antimuscarinic dries secretions most?

Glycopyrrolate.

Is scopolamine the most potent antisialagogue?

No; glycopyrrolate outranks scopolamine and atropine.

Common misconception That scopolamine is the strongest drying agent

Report a problem with entry 45: Glycopyrrolate is the most potent antisialagogue

Part 1046 / 129

Fentanyl barely changes urine output; volatile agents such as halothane reduce it

Opioids such as fentanyl barely change renal function or urine output. Volatile agents such as halothane reduce GFR and urine flow by depressing the circulation.

Why

Systemic fentanyl does not raise vasopressin, renin or aldosterone. The hormonal drive to hold on to salt and water is therefore not switched on, and any renal change during opioid anaesthesia comes second-hand from haemodynamics. Volatile agents depress the myocardium and dilate vessels, which lowers renal blood flow and filtration. Any technique that causes hypotension also cuts urine flow, because it changes the hydrostatic forces around the peritubular capillaries even when autoregulation still holds.

The trap

Halothane preserves urine output through renal perfusion. Halothane is tempting because renal blood flow is reported to be maintained with it, which suggests a kidney-friendly agent. But keeping flow is not the same as keeping output. Volatile agents still reduce filtration through myocardial depression and vasodilation, so urine output falls.

Evidence

Systemic fentanyl-type opioids leave vasopressin, renin and aldosterone unchanged and preserve renal function. Volatile agents cause mild to moderate falls in renal blood flow and GFR, although blood flow may be preserved with halothane. Hypotension from any technique reduces urine flow.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which agent least affects urine output: fentanyl or a volatile agent?

Fentanyl.

Halothane is said to maintain renal blood flow. Does urine output hold too?

No; volatiles reduce filtration and urine flow.

Common misconception That preserved renal blood flow means preserved urine output

Report a problem with entry 46: Fentanyl barely changes urine output; volatile agents such as halothane reduce it

Part 1047 / 129

Among injectable steroids, betamethasone has the greatest anti-inflammatory potency

Ranking steroids by anti-inflammatory potency relative to cortisol: betamethasone (25) clearly outranks methylprednisolone and prednisone, so pick betamethasone.

Why

Glucocorticoid potency is expressed against cortisol, which is fixed at 1.0. A higher figure means a smaller dose in milligrams gives the same anti-inflammatory effect. Prednisone and methylprednisolone are only a few times stronger than cortisol, at four and five times respectively. Betamethasone rates 25, which puts it far above both. So when betamethasone is offered alongside those two for an injection, it is the choice with the greatest anti-inflammatory potency.

The trap

Methylprednisolone is most potent corticosteroid. Methylprednisolone is a familiar injectable steroid and is a little stronger than prednisone, so it can look like the strongest option. On the cortisol-referenced scale, though, it sits just above prednisone and well below betamethasone.

Evidence

Betamethasone's potency is 25. On the anti-inflammatory scale, with cortisol as the 1.0 reference, methylprednisolone scores one more than prednisone, which scores between three and five (exclusive).

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Of prednisone, methylprednisolone and betamethasone, which has the greatest anti-inflammatory potency per milligram?

Betamethasone, rated 25 against cortisol.

How potent is methylprednisolone relative to cortisol?

About five times; far below betamethasone.

Common misconception That methylprednisolone is the strongest injectable steroid

Report a problem with entry 47: Among injectable steroids, betamethasone has the greatest anti-inflammatory potency

Back to card 7Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsDoses and numbers

  1. 048Paracetamol (acetaminophen) maximum: 4 g a day in adults (2 g with liver or kidney disease); under 90 mg/kg a day in children
  2. 049Opioid conversion: 10 mg IV morphine = 30 mg oral morphine = 20 mg oral oxycodone
  3. 050Adrenaline (epinephrine) dilution: 1 mg in 10 mL gives 0.1 mg/mL
  4. 051Rocuronium ED95 is 0.3 mg/kg
  5. 052Propofol ED50 for loss of consciousness is 1-1.5 mg/kg
Part 1048 / 129

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) maximum: 4 g a day in adults (2 g with liver or kidney disease); under 90 mg/kg a day in children

Cap paracetamol at 4 g per day in healthy adults. Lower the ceiling to 2 g or less when liver or kidney function is impaired.

Why

The daily ceiling exists to prevent liver injury. A healthy adult can safely take up to 4 g in 24 hours, and more than that counts as a toxic dose. If the liver is diseased or the kidneys are impaired, the margin shrinks, so the ceiling drops to 2 g or less. Paracetamol is also hidden in many combined oral opioid tablets. Count every source towards the daily total. Giving it intravenously avoids first-pass hepatic exposure and lowers the risk of liver injury.

The trap

Two grams daily ceiling for all adults. 2 g/day is a real ceiling, so it looks like the safe, cautious choice. But it applies only to patients with impaired liver or kidney function. A young patient with acute pain and no stated organ disease gets the full adult ceiling.

Evidence

Adults: 4 g a day at most; above 4 g in 24 hours is toxic, so count paracetamol hidden in combined opioid tablets. Impaired liver or kidney function: 2 g or less. Children: under 90 mg/kg in 24 hours.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A healthy 25-year-old has acute pain. Maximum paracetamol in 24 hours?

4 g, counting combination tablets.

What is the daily paracetamol ceiling for an adult with cirrhosis?

2 g or less.

Report a problem with entry 48: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) maximum: 4 g a day in adults (2 g with liver or kidney disease); under 90 mg/kg a day in children

Part 1049 / 129

Opioid conversion: 10 mg IV morphine = 30 mg oral morphine = 20 mg oral oxycodone

Convert IV morphine to oral oxycodone by doubling the dose: 10 mg IV morphine = 30 mg oral morphine = 20 mg oral oxycodone.

Why

Equianalgesic tables compare every opioid with morphine, so do the conversion in two steps rather than one. First, change the route: 10 mg IV morphine matches 30 mg oral morphine, which triples the dose. Second, change the drug: 30 mg oral morphine matches 20 mg oral oxycodone, which is two-thirds of that. Together, the oral oxycodone dose is twice the IV morphine dose. Barash also lists a parenteral oxycodone dose. That dose is for injection, not tablets.

The trap

One-fifty milligrams complete oxycodone conversion. 150 mg is the oral morphine equivalent, so it looks like a finished answer. It only covers the route change. It leaves out the second step, from morphine to oxycodone, which reduces the dose to two-thirds. The correct tablet dose is double the IV morphine dose.

Evidence

Barash's text and Miller's consensus table both say 10 mg IV morphine equals 30 mg oral morphine and 20 mg oral oxycodone. Barash lists parenteral oxycodone as 10–15 mg and says its table is only a general guide.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient needs 15 mg IV morphine a day. What is the oral morphine equivalent?

45 mg oral morphine.

A patient stable on 5 mg IV morphine switches to oxycodone tablets. Equivalent dose?

10 mg oral oxycodone: twice the IV morphine.

Report a problem with entry 49: Opioid conversion: 10 mg IV morphine = 30 mg oral morphine = 20 mg oral oxycodone

Part 1050 / 129

Adrenaline (epinephrine) dilution: 1 mg in 10 mL gives 0.1 mg/mL

Adrenaline (epinephrine) 1:1000 is 1 mg/mL. Make 1 mL up to a final volume of 10 mL to get 0.1 mg/mL (100 mcg/mL, 1:10,000).

Why

The ratio is grams of drug per millilitres of solution, so 1:1000 means 1 mg in every mL. Concentration is the total drug divided by the final volume. Drawing up 1 mL (1 mg) and making it up to 10 mL spreads that 1 mg through the larger volume, giving 0.1 mg/mL, which is 100 mcg/mL or 1:10,000. Diluting again by the same factor gives 10 mcg/mL (1:100,000). Taking a smaller amount out of a well-mixed bag never changes its concentration.

The trap

One milligram in ten makes required concentration. It is a real bedside recipe, so it looks familiar. But it makes the weaker push-dose strength of 10 mcg/mL (1:100,000). Drawing 10 mL out of the bag does not concentrate it. To reach 0.1 mg/mL, the 1 mg must sit in a final volume of only 10 mL.

Evidence

The textbooks label 1:1000 adrenaline as 1 mg/mL, the intramuscular anaphylaxis strength. They label 1:10,000 as 100 mcg/mL, used for arrest and unstable bradycardia doses. A further dilution to 1:100,000 gives 10 mcg/mL, used for small incremental boluses.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
How do you make 1:10,000 adrenaline from a 1 mg/mL ampoule?

Make 1 mL up to 10 mL: 0.1 mg/mL.

1 mg adrenaline goes into a 100 mL bag. What strength does a 10 mL syringe drawn from it hold?

10 mcg/mL; drawing off a smaller volume never concentrates it.

Common misconception That withdrawing a smaller volume concentrates the drug

Report a problem with entry 50: Adrenaline (epinephrine) dilution: 1 mg in 10 mL gives 0.1 mg/mL

Part 1051 / 129

Rocuronium ED95 is 0.3 mg/kg

Rocuronium ED95 is 0.3 mg/kg; the usual intubating dose is 0.6 mg/kg (2× ED95), and rapid sequence dose is 1.2 mg/kg (4× ED95).

Why

ED95 is shorthand for the dose that produces a 95% twitch reduction in 50% of patients. It measures potency: the smaller the ED95, the more potent the drug. Rocuronium is a weak blocker at 0.3 mg/kg, while vecuronium's ED95 is 0.05, so vecuronium is the more potent drug. A single ED95 is not enough for reliable intubating conditions, so doses are given as multiples of it. Because rocuronium is weak, a large dose delivers many molecules, and this shortens onset.

The trap

Zero point six rocuronium ED95. 0.6 mg/kg is the rocuronium figure people remember best, because it is the standard intubating dose. But that dose is twice the ED95, deliberately set above the potency figure so that intubating conditions are reliable. The ED95 itself is half of it.

Evidence

Barash lists the ED95 of rocuronium and succinylcholine as 0.3 mg/kg, and that of vecuronium and cisatracurium as 0.05. Routine intubation uses 2× or 3× the ED95, which is 0.6 mg/kg for rocuronium. A 4× dose, 1.2 mg/kg, brings onset to about 1 minute.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Rocuronium's dose for 95% twitch depression in half of patients is how much?

0.3 mg/kg.

Common misconception That the ED95 equals the 0.6 mg/kg intubating dose

What rapid sequence dose of rocuronium is used, as a multiple of its ED95?

1.2 mg/kg, four times the ED95.

Report a problem with entry 51: Rocuronium ED95 is 0.3 mg/kg

Part 1052 / 129

Propofol ED50 for loss of consciousness is 1-1.5 mg/kg

The median dose abolishing consciousness in half of adult bolus patients is 1–1.5 mg/kg, below the usual 2–2.5 mg/kg induction dose.

Why

A median effective dose makes only half of patients respond. A working induction dose has to put nearly everyone to sleep, so it sits above the median. Age also changes requirements. Children have a larger volume of distribution because the drug redistributes quickly, so their induction needs rise as age falls. In infants aged 1–6 months, the median dose for losing the eyelash reflex is 3 mg/kg, roughly double the adult figure.

The trap

Two-point-five milligrams kilogramme is median. It is tempting because 2.5 mg/kg is the induction dose most people remember, and it is quoted alongside propofol's rapid onset. It fails because a clinical dose is chosen to work in almost every patient. The median dose, which works in only half, is lower.

Evidence

In adults, the median bolus dose for loss of consciousness is 1–1.5 mg/kg. Hypnosis lasts 5–10 minutes after 2–2.5 mg/kg. Younger patients need more: infants aged 1–6 months need a median of 3 mg/kg to lose the eyelash reflex.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What propofol bolus abolishes consciousness in half of adults?

1–1.5 mg/kg.

Why is the usual propofol induction dose 2–2.5 mg/kg rather than its ED50?

It must work in nearly every patient, not half.

Report a problem with entry 52: Propofol ED50 for loss of consciousness is 1-1.5 mg/kg

Back to card 8Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionMonitoring the block

  1. 053Laryngeal muscles are blocked before the adductor pollicis
  2. 054Recovery from block: a measured train-of-four ratio of 0.9; head lift is the classic bedside test, a tongue-depressor clench more reliable, grip recovers last
  3. 055Feeling for fade: double-burst stimulation beats train-of-four, neither reliable above a ratio of about 0.4
Part 2053 / 129

Laryngeal muscles are blocked before the adductor pollicis

After a non-depolarising relaxant, the laryngeal adductors (the arytenoid group), diaphragm and masseter block first. The adductor pollicis and other limb muscles block later.

Why

Laryngeal and diaphragmatic muscles are actually more resistant to non-depolarising drugs than the thumb. However, they get more blood flow per gram, so a higher peak drug level reaches them before the drug redistributes. Their plasma-to-effect-site equilibration half-life is therefore shorter: 2.7 versus 4.4 minutes at the thumb. Their resistance only shows during recovery, when these central muscles move again before the thumb does. So the thumb, the muscle we usually monitor, lags the larynx both at onset and at offset.

The trap

Laryngeal muscles block before adductor pollicis. It sounds like the adductor pollicis or the foot monitoring site, so it feels like the textbook reference muscle. But it is a peripheral limb muscle with less blood flow and slower drug equilibration. Peripheral muscles are among the last to block, not the first.

Evidence

The laryngeal adductors and diaphragm block faster than the thumb, even though they are relatively resistant. The larynx equilibrates faster (2.7 versus 4.4 minutes). This is put down to greater central blood flow. Their resistance appears only as earlier recovery.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After rocuronium, which blocks first: the laryngeal adductors or the adductor pollicis?

Laryngeal adductors, with the diaphragm and masseter.

Why do laryngeal muscles block sooner even though they resist non-depolarisers more?

Greater blood flow gives faster drug equilibration.

Report a problem with entry 53: Laryngeal muscles are blocked before the adductor pollicis

Part 2054 / 129

Recovery from block: a measured train-of-four ratio of 0.9; head lift is the classic bedside test, a tongue-depressor clench more reliable, grip recovers last

Only a measured TOF ratio of 0.9 proves reversal; bedside tests are insensitive: head lift is classic, tongue-depressor clench more reliable, grip recovers last.

Why

Felt or seen fade shows only while blockade is marked: Miller puts the tactile ceiling near 0.31, and elsewhere says estimation is reliable only below 0.4. Between 0.4 and 0.9 no fade is felt, so only a measured ratio closes that gap. Awake patients are tested clinically, but these tests are insensitive too. The classic 5-second head lift is passed at a ratio of about 0.6; clenching a tongue depressor needs about 0.85; grip may still be only about 60% of control at 0.7 to 0.75, so it recovers last.

The trap

Normal tidal volume taken as recovery. Good breathing after extubation looks like recovery, and tidal volume is usually the first thing checked. But ventilation returns while much of the receptor pool is still blocked, so a normal tidal volume can sit alongside a weak grip and says little about residual paralysis.

Evidence

Miller says felt fade is missed above an average ratio near 0.31 and is accurate only below 0.4, so between 0.4 and 0.9 a measured ratio is needed. At 0.7 to 0.75 grip may be about 60% of control; tongue-depressor clenching outperforms head lift.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 58-year-old after laparotomy lifts her head for 5 seconds and no fade is felt on train-of-four. Which finding actually proves adequate reversal?

Head lift passes at about 0.6; only a measured ratio of 0.9 proves reversal.

A 70-year-old is extubated with normal tidal volume and respiratory rate, but grip is weak. Does the normal breathing exclude residual paralysis?

No; ventilation returns while much of the receptor pool is still blocked.

Common misconception That a normal tidal volume means the block has recovered

Report a problem with entry 54: Recovery from block: a measured train-of-four ratio of 0.9; head lift is the classic bedside test, a tongue-depressor clench more reliable, grip recovers last

Part 2055 / 129

Feeling for fade: double-burst stimulation beats train-of-four, neither reliable above a ratio of about 0.4

Manual assessment detects train-of-four fade only below 0.4 and double-burst only to about 0.6; neither excludes residual block, so measure quantitatively to 0.9.

Why

Fingers and eyes cannot reliably compare the fourth twitch with the first when the difference is modest, so manual assessment overestimates recovery. Double-burst replaces the train with short tetanic bursts, each felt as one movement, making a weaker second response easier to notice. The gain is modest. Weakness persists at a ratio of 0.7, and the pharynx does not recover until the ratio exceeds 0.9. Both lie beyond what either pattern can show, so finding no fade proves nothing. Fade you can feel confirms inadequate recovery.

The trap

Point-seven ratio indicates complete recovery. 0.7 was once the accepted recovery benchmark, so the number feels familiar. But clinical weakness persists at that ratio, and pharyngeal function is not normal until the ratio exceeds 0.9. A ratio of 0.7 is residual block, not good recovery.

Evidence

Miller says touch or sight judges fade accurately only below a ratio of 0.4, so it overestimates recovery. The European guideline puts the limit of detectable fade at 0.4 for train-of-four and 0.6 for double-burst. Barash calls double-burst a slight improvement.

Sources: Miller 10eOutside our books: Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: a guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (2023)Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Up to roughly what ratio can fade be felt by hand with train-of-four, and with double-burst?

About 0.4 with train-of-four; about 0.6 with double-burst.

After vecuronium, a quantitative monitor reads a train-of-four ratio of 0.7. Is neuromuscular recovery adequate?

No; weakness persists at 0.7, and pharyngeal function needs a ratio above 0.9.

Common misconception That a ratio of 0.7 marks good recovery

Report a problem with entry 55: Feeling for fade: double-burst stimulation beats train-of-four, neither reliable above a ratio of about 0.4

Back to card 9Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionDepth, EEG and stages

  1. 056Ketamine raises the BIS; nitrous oxide's EEG effect is too subtle for the BIS to register
  2. 057Isoflurane gives burst suppression at about 1.5 MAC (full EEG suppression at 1.5-2 MAC)
  3. 058Guedel stage 2 (excitement): unconscious with irregular breathing; breathing becomes regular again in stage 3
Part 2056 / 129

Ketamine raises the BIS; nitrous oxide's EEG effect is too subtle for the BIS to register

Expect ketamine to push BIS up and nitrous oxide to leave it largely unchanged. Neither reading means the patient is less deeply anaesthetised.

Why

Depth indices read the EEG patterns of GABA-ergic hypnotics well. Ketamine's EEG changes are different, so the index misreads them. It climbs falsely even as antinociception deepens: from 40 to 63 after 0.5 mg/kg on a propofol–fentanyl background. Nitrous oxide also acts differently from GABA-ergic drugs, and given alone it rarely produces full unconsciousness. Its EEG changes are small and inconsistent, so its contribution barely moves the number.

The trap

Fentanyl explains ketamine raising BIS. Opioids add analgesia with little hypnotic effect, so someone may expect fentanyl to leave the index high. But fentanyl was part of the background regimen that held BIS low until ketamine raised it. The drug whose effect the index misses is nitrous oxide.

Evidence

Barash reports that a higher dose of ketamine added to propofol–fentanyl anaesthesia raises BIS markedly. Miller says ketamine's EEG changes falsely raise depth indices despite better antinociception. Miller also says nitrous oxide's minimal, subtle EEG effects make its contribution hard for indices to detect.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
BIS rises after a ketamine bolus during stable propofol anaesthesia. Is the patient lighter?

No; ketamine pushes BIS up falsely.

Which agent adds to anaesthesia yet barely lowers the BIS reading: nitrous oxide or propofol?

Nitrous oxide; its EEG effect is too subtle.

Report a problem with entry 56: Ketamine raises the BIS; nitrous oxide's EEG effect is too subtle for the BIS to register

Part 2057 / 129

Isoflurane gives burst suppression at about 1.5 MAC (full EEG suppression at 1.5-2 MAC)

Isoflurane at about 1.5 MAC causes burst suppression on EEG (alternating activity and suppression); at 1.5–2 MAC the trace becomes flat, showing complete suppression.

Why

Isoflurane depresses cortical electrical activity more as the dose rises. As the level deepens, the EEG slows. It then shows bursts separated by flat periods at about 1.5 MAC, and it becomes isoelectric between 1.5 and 2 MAC. Cerebral oxygen consumption falls alongside this and reaches its lowest point at the same moment the EEG goes silent. Giving more isoflurane, even up to 6% end-tidal, lowers metabolism no further and shows no metabolic toxicity.

The trap

Burst suppression starts above two MAC. Burst suppression feels like very deep anaesthesia, so a high figure is tempting. But isoflurane already produces bursts at about 1.5 MAC and is fully isoelectric by 2 MAC. At a higher concentration, beyond 2 MAC, the EEG is past complete suppression, not at the point where burst suppression starts.

Evidence

The textbook puts the isoflurane burst-suppression pattern at about 1.5 MAC. It says EEG suppression, together with the largest fall in cerebral oxygen consumption, happens at 1.5 to 2 MAC in humans. Extra isoflurane up to 6% end-tidal gives no further metabolic reduction.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
At about what MAC of isoflurane does EEG burst suppression appear?

About 1.5 MAC.

What does the EEG show with isoflurane at 1.5–2 MAC?

A flat, isoelectric trace: complete suppression.

Report a problem with entry 57: Isoflurane gives burst suppression at about 1.5 MAC (full EEG suppression at 1.5-2 MAC)

Part 2058 / 129

Guedel stage 2 (excitement): unconscious with irregular breathing; breathing becomes regular again in stage 3

An unconscious patient breathing irregularly, whether going under or waking up, is in the second (excitement) stage; regular breathing indicates the third stage.

Why

The classical ether scheme sorts depth by what the patient shows. In the first stage the patient still answers to voice, breathes normally and keeps airway reflexes. In the second stage consciousness is lost, but higher control is not yet suppressed. Breathing becomes erratic, sometimes with overbreathing, and there may be purposeless movement and dangerous reflexes such as laryngospasm, vomiting and arrhythmias. Only in the third, surgical stage does breathing settle into a regular rhythm. So erratic breathing without responsiveness points to the second stage.

The trap

Irregular breathing defines surgical anaesthetic stage. A breathing rate this slow looks like deep anaesthesia, so the surgical stage seems likely. But the surgical stage is defined by breathing that has become regular again. Irregular, unpredictable breaths in an unresponsive patient belong to the excitement stage, not the surgical one.

Evidence

In the classical stages, the first stage keeps verbal response and normal breathing. The second (delirium or excitement) stage brings unconsciousness, erratic breathing, purposeless movement and reflex risks. The third stage marks the return of regular breathing and is where MAC is reached.

Sources: Mayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During gas induction, a child is unresponsive, moving purposelessly and breathing erratically. Which stage?

Stage 2, excitement.

Breathing settles into a regular rhythm in an unconscious patient being deepened. Which Guedel stage?

Stage 3, the surgical stage.

Report a problem with entry 58: Guedel stage 2 (excitement): unconscious with irregular breathing; breathing becomes regular again in stage 3

Back to card 10Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionDrug syndromes and their antidotes

  1. 059Central anticholinergic syndrome after atropine or scopolamine: physostigmine
  2. 060Propofol infusion syndrome: refractory bradycardia, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis and lipaemia after 4 mg/kg/h or more for 48 hours; stop the infusion. Green urine is a harmless propofol effect
  3. 061Eyes open with nystagmus under ketamine is expected
  4. 062Serotonin syndrome: clonus, hyperreflexia and hyperthermia after combined serotonergic drugs
  5. 063Metoclopramide blocks dopamine receptors and worsens Parkinson's disease: rigidity after surgery
  6. 064Droperidol extrapyramidal reaction: diphenhydramine
Part 2059 / 129

Central anticholinergic syndrome after atropine or scopolamine: physostigmine

New delirium or confusion after scopolamine or high-dose atropine is central anticholinergic syndrome. Treat it with intravenous physostigmine.

Why

Scopolamine, and atropine in large doses, pass into the brain. Central muscarinic blockade then causes restlessness, confusion, delirium or stupor. Peripheral signs such as dry mouth and blurred vision appear too. Reversal needs an anticholinesterase that reaches the brain. Physostigmine is a tertiary amine, so it crosses into the brain. Neostigmine and edrophonium are quaternary, so they cannot act centrally.

The trap

Neostigmine reverses central anticholinergic syndrome. Neostigmine is the anticholinesterase used daily to reverse neuromuscular block. So it feels like the natural antidote. But it is quaternary and cannot cross into the brain. The central muscarinic blockade driving the delirium is left untouched.

Evidence

It follows scopolamine most often, and sometimes high-dose atropine. Features include delirium, confusion or obtundation, with dry mouth and blurred vision. Physostigmine, a tertiary amine, crosses into the brain and treats it. Quaternary anticholinesterases cannot.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An elderly patient premedicated with scopolamine wakes delirious, dry-mouthed and unable to focus. What has happened?

Scopolamine-induced central muscarinic blockade: the central anticholinergic picture.

Which anticholinesterase treats central anticholinergic syndrome, and why not neostigmine?

Physostigmine; neostigmine is quaternary and cannot enter the brain.

Common misconception That neostigmine reverses central anticholinergic effects

Report a problem with entry 59: Central anticholinergic syndrome after atropine or scopolamine: physostigmine

Part 2060 / 129

Propofol infusion syndrome: refractory bradycardia, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis and lipaemia after 4 mg/kg/h or more for 48 hours; stop the infusion. Green urine is a harmless propofol effect

PRIS after 48 hours at ≥4 mg/kg/h: refractory bradycardia, acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, lipaemia; stop propofol. Green urine is a harmless propofol effect, not a PRIS sign.

Why

PRIS is a dose- and duration-dependent injury: heart and skeletal muscle break down, producing refractory bradycardia progressing to asystole, myocardial failure, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalaemia, lactic acidosis and lipaemia. Because the drug drives the injury, the remedy is removal, not dose reduction or buffering: discontinue propofol and consider continuous haemofiltration. Long infusions can turn urine green through a phenolic or quinol metabolite; this is benign and signals nothing about PRIS. Dark brown urine would fit the myoglobinuria of rhabdomyolysis, but that is an inference; no book names a PRIS urine colour.

The trap

Rate reduction stops propofol syndrome. Turning the rate down feels proportionate, because the syndrome tracks dose and many drug side effects settle with titration. But once muscle and myocardial injury is under way, any continued exposure keeps driving it. The sources direct stopping the drug, not running it at a lower rate.

Evidence

The syndrome follows infusions of 4 mg/kg/h or more lasting 48 hours, and refractory bradycardia leads it. Lactic acidosis, lipaemia, rhabdomyolysis and myocardial failure follow. Propofol should be stopped and haemofiltration considered. Green urine after long infusions has no clinical significance.

Sources: Stoelting 8eBarash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A ventilated patient on propofol 5 mg/kg/h for three days develops refractory bradycardia and acidosis. Action?

Stop propofol and switch to another sedative.

Common misconception That turning the propofol rate down is enough

Urine turns green during a long propofol infusion. Is this a sign of propofol infusion syndrome?

No; it is a harmless metabolite effect.

Common misconception That green urine signals propofol infusion syndrome

Report a problem with entry 60: Propofol infusion syndrome: refractory bradycardia, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis and lipaemia after 4 mg/kg/h or more for 48 hours; stop the infusion. Green urine is a harmless propofol effect

Part 2061 / 129

Eyes open with nystagmus under ketamine is expected

After an anaesthetic dose of ketamine, open eyes with nystagmus and moderately dilated pupils are the normal dissociative picture, not a complication.

Why

Ketamine uncouples thalamocortical activity from the limbic system, and the EEG shows the two falling out of synchrony. So the patient can be anaesthetised and pain-free while looking awake. The eyelids stay open, the gaze drifts with nystagmus and the pupils widen moderately. Corneal, cough and swallow reflexes may still be present, but they cannot be trusted to protect the airway. This awake look is the drug working as expected. It is not a sign of light anaesthesia or of a new neurological event.

The trap

Eyes open nystagmus indicates seizure. Open, roving eyes with nystagmus in an unresponsive patient can look like seizure activity. But this is exactly the dissociative state ketamine is described as producing, so reading it as a convulsion treats a normal drug effect as a disease.

Evidence

The textbooks describe ketamine's dissociative state as one where the eyes stay open with a nystagmic gaze and the pupils dilate moderately. The EEG shows the thalamus uncoupled from limbic structures. Some airway reflexes may persist but should not be relied on for protection.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After ketamine induction the eyes are open, with nystagmus and moderately wide pupils. Concern?

None; this is the normal dissociative picture.

Common misconception That roving eyes under ketamine mean a convulsion

Under ketamine, can preserved cough and swallow reflexes be relied on to protect the airway?

No; they may persist but are unreliable.

Report a problem with entry 61: Eyes open with nystagmus under ketamine is expected

Part 2062 / 129

Serotonin syndrome: clonus, hyperreflexia and hyperthermia after combined serotonergic drugs

Two or more serotonergic drugs plus agitation, fever, sweating, tachycardia and clonus or hyperreflexia means serotonin syndrome, not neuroleptic malignant syndrome or malignant hyperthermia.

Why

The cause is too much serotonin in the central nervous system. It builds up when several serotonergic agents are given together: antidepressants, MAOIs, some antibiotics and antiemetics, and the phenylpiperidine opioids such as tramadol and pethidine, which weakly block serotonin reuptake. The excess drives three systems. Neuromuscular: clonus, myoclonus, hyperreflexia and tremor. Autonomic: sweating, tachycardia and fever. Mental: agitation and confusion. Onset is within 12 hours. The dopamine-antagonist syndrome develops more slowly, with rigidity, bradykinesia and stupor.

The trap

Metoclopramide causes serotonin syndrome. It is tempting because it also causes fever, autonomic instability and altered mentation, and antiemetics such as metoclopramide can trigger it. But it follows dopamine blockade, develops over days, and shows rigidity, bradykinesia and stupor rather than clonus and brisk reflexes.

Evidence

Textbooks list antidepressants, MAOIs, opioids, antibiotics and antiemetics as culprits, and pethidine, tramadol and methadone act as weak reuptake inhibitors. Hallmarks are clonus, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, agitation, sweating and fever, usually starting within 12 hours, unlike the slower, rigid, stuporous neuroleptic syndrome.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient on an SSRI is given tramadol and within hours has fever, sweating and clonus. Diagnosis?

Serotonin syndrome.

How does neuroleptic malignant syndrome differ on examination from serotonin syndrome?

Rigidity, bradykinesia and slower onset; no clonus or brisk reflexes.

Common misconception That fever with autonomic instability means neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Report a problem with entry 62: Serotonin syndrome: clonus, hyperreflexia and hyperthermia after combined serotonergic drugs

Part 2063 / 129

Metoclopramide blocks dopamine receptors and worsens Parkinson's disease: rigidity after surgery

Avoid metoclopramide in Parkinson's disease: it blocks central dopamine receptors, worsening rigidity, so new postoperative rigidity after its administration implicates this drug.

Why

Parkinson's disease destroys dopaminergic neurons that drive the extrapyramidal motor system. The resulting imbalance between neurotransmitters causes slow movement, rigidity and tremor. Metoclopramide blocks dopamine receptors (and serotonin receptors), so it shuts down what dopaminergic signalling is left. This deepens the functional dopamine deficit and can bring out or worsen rigidity. The same reasoning rules out other antidopaminergic antiemetics, such as droperidol, haloperidol and prochlorperazine, in these patients.

The trap

Anticholinergic toxicity causes dopamine blockade. Anticholinergic syndrome is a well-known postoperative diagnosis, and some antiemetics also have anticholinergic activity. But metoclopramide works by blocking dopamine receptors, not muscarinic ones. The sources link it to worse parkinsonian rigidity through that dopamine blockade, and anticholinergic toxicity does not explain new extrapyramidal rigidity.

Evidence

The texts list metoclopramide as a dopamine receptor antagonist antiemetic. They say dopamine antagonism can make parkinsonian features, including muscular rigidity, worse. They also say it is contraindicated in Parkinson's disease, along with other drugs that provoke extrapyramidal effects.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A levodopa-treated patient stiffens up hours after receiving metoclopramide on the ward. Mechanism?

Central D2 blockade deepening the dopamine deficit.

Is new rigidity after metoclopramide explained by anticholinergic toxicity?

No; metoclopramide blocks dopamine, not muscarinic, receptors.

Common misconception That the rigidity reflects central anticholinergic syndrome

Report a problem with entry 63: Metoclopramide blocks dopamine receptors and worsens Parkinson's disease: rigidity after surgery

Part 2064 / 129

Droperidol extrapyramidal reaction: diphenhydramine

If a child develops acute dystonia after droperidol (eyes rolled up, twisted rigid neck), give intravenous diphenhydramine, a centrally acting anticholinergic antihistamine.

Why

Droperidol is a butyrophenone that blocks dopamine receptors, including those in the basal ganglia. There, dopamine normally balances cholinergic signalling. When dopamine is blocked, cholinergic tone goes unopposed, and the result is sudden sustained muscle contraction: oculogyric crisis, torticollis and a spasming tongue or jaw. The treatment has to reach the brain and restore that balance. Diphenhydramine crosses the blood-brain barrier and has anticholinergic activity as well as blocking histamine, so it reverses the reaction, usually quickly.

The trap

Midazolam fixes droperidol dystonia. A distressed, rigid child after anaesthesia makes you think of a benzodiazepine for sedation or muscle relaxation. Midazolam may calm the child, but it does not correct the loss of dopamine-cholinergic balance that causes the dystonia. The sources name diphenhydramine as the treatment.

Evidence

Drugs that block dopamine receptors can cause acute dystonic reactions, and this happens in about 1% of patients given droperidol. Treatment is an agent that gets into the brain. Intravenous diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg resolves acute dystonia.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 10-year-old develops upward eye deviation and a twisted neck after droperidol. Diagnosis?

Acute dystonia: an extrapyramidal reaction.

What treats acute dystonia after droperidol?

Intravenous diphenhydramine.

Common misconception That midazolam corrects the dystonia

Report a problem with entry 64: Droperidol extrapyramidal reaction: diphenhydramine

Back to card 11Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionThe drug behind the finding

  1. 065Intravenous codeine releases histamine: hypotension and rash
  2. 066Pethidine is the opioid that dilates the pupils
  3. 067Junctional bradycardia with sevoflurane induction in children with Down syndrome and strabismus
  4. 068Tamoxifen raises venous thromboembolism risk
  5. 069Bleomycin causes pulmonary toxicity: pneumonitis and fibrosis
  6. 070Insulin can provoke a seizure through hypoglycaemia
  7. 071Topical phenylephrine (nose drops) can cause severe hypertension with reflex bradycardia
  8. 072Room-temperature storage degrades succinylcholine the most
  9. 073Ketamine causes hallucinations and vivid dreams on emergence
Part 2065 / 129

Intravenous codeine releases histamine: hypotension and rash

Opioid-induced hypotension with truncal rash or flushing during anaesthesia suggests direct histamine release, typically from codeine, morphine or pethidine.

Why

Some opioids set off skin mast cells directly. This is not IgE-mediated and is not a mu-receptor effect: fentanyl and sufentanil are very potent mu agonists yet release no histamine in skin. Morphine does it through a mast-cell receptor called MRGPRX2. The histamine released widens terminal arterioles, so vascular resistance and blood pressure fall while heart rate and contractility rise. The skin reacts too, so the picture looks like allergy even though true opioid allergy is rare. This is why intravenous codeine is not used.

The trap

Codeine is main histamine-releasing opioid. It is an intravenous opioid and its name echoes morphine, so it looks like the obvious histamine releaser. But these texts name only morphine, codeine and pethidine as opioids that release histamine. Potency at the mu receptor does not predict mast-cell release.

Evidence

Stoelting names morphine, codeine and pethidine as opioids that release histamine straight from mast cells and basophils, mimicking allergy. Miller says intravenous codeine causes profound hypotension and is not recommended. Barash says fentanyl and sufentanil release no histamine in skin.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
IV codeine during anaesthesia is followed by hypotension and truncal flushing. Mechanism?

Direct mast-cell histamine release, not true allergy.

Which opioids release histamine: fentanyl, or morphine, codeine and pethidine?

Morphine, codeine and pethidine; fentanyl does not.

Report a problem with entry 65: Intravenous codeine releases histamine: hypotension and rash

Part 2066 / 129

Pethidine is the opioid that dilates the pupils

In a sedated patient with dilated pupils after an opioid, suspect pethidine (meperidine). The other opioids constrict the pupils.

Why

Most opioids make the pupils small, so pinpoint pupils with drowsiness is the classic sign of opioid excess. Pethidine is the exception because its structure resembles atropine and it has some anticholinergic activity. Anticholinergic drugs widen the pupil, so pethidine does not produce the usual small pupils. That is why an opioid-poisoned patient with wide pupils suggests pethidine and not a typical opioid.

The trap

Morphine dilates pupils. Morphine is the standard opioid, and drowsiness after a wrong prescription looks like opioid overdose, so it is the reflex choice. But morphine constricts the pupils. Wide, fixed pupils argue against it and point to the one opioid with atropine-like action.

Evidence

A toxicology table lists opioids among drugs that cause small pupils but names pethidine as the exception. Anticholinergics head its list of drugs that dilate the pupils. A review text says pethidine resembles atropine in structure and has mild anticholinergic effects.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A drowsy patient has wide pupils after an opioid prescribing error. Which opioid?

Pethidine (meperidine).

Common misconception That morphine overdose gives wide pupils

Why does pethidine fail to cause pinpoint pupils?

Atropine-like anticholinergic activity.

Report a problem with entry 66: Pethidine is the opioid that dilates the pupils

Part 2067 / 129

Junctional bradycardia with sevoflurane induction in children with Down syndrome and strabismus

Sevoflurane is the volatile that slows heart rate at paediatric induction, most in Down syndrome; reduce it, oxygenate, and give atropine if needed.

Why

All volatile agents depress the sinoatrial node's firing rate and slow conduction through the His–Purkinje system. Sevoflurane is the agent used for inhalational induction in children, so this nodal depression shows up at induction. Children with trisomy 21, and those with congenital heart disease, are especially prone. Severe slowing occurs in up to 50% of children with Down syndrome. Reducing the agent and correcting hypoxia often restore the rate. If drugs are needed, give atropine or adrenaline.

The trap

Desflurane bradycardia trisomy 21 induction. Desflurane is tempting because it is the other modern volatile, and its pungency can cause laryngospasm with hypoxic slowing. But it is not used for inhalational induction. It is also not the agent the sources single out for bradycardia in trisomy 21: that agent is sevoflurane.

Evidence

The texts list sevoflurane among the commonest drug causes of bradycardia in children, particularly in trisomy 21 and congenital heart disease. Severe slowing affects up to 50% of children with Down syndrome at sevoflurane induction. Volatiles slow sinoatrial discharge and conduction.

Sources: Stoelting 8eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A child with Down syndrome becomes bradycardic during inhalational induction. Which agent is responsible?

Sevoflurane.

How do you manage junctional bradycardia at sevoflurane induction?

Reduce the agent, oxygenate; atropine if needed.

Report a problem with entry 67: Junctional bradycardia with sevoflurane induction in children with Down syndrome and strabismus

Part 2068 / 129

Tamoxifen raises venous thromboembolism risk

In a cancer patient on combination chemotherapy with DVT or PE, suspect tamoxifen; cyclophosphamide, bleomycin and doxorubicin are not listed as thrombogenic alone.

Why

Cancer is already prothrombotic because tumours release procoagulants such as tissue factor, and some anticancer drugs add to that risk. Stoelting names tamoxifen as a thrombogenic drug in its text, in its drug-toxicity table and in its breast cancer section, where the listed events are deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and stroke. The drugs with the highest risk are thalidomide and lenalidomide, and cisplatin is also implicated. Doxorubicin appears only as a co-drug that increases the risk from thalidomide, not as a cause in its own right.

The trap

Doxorubicin independently causes thromboembolism. Doxorubicin is tempting because the text lists it beside thalidomide, which carries a high venous thrombosis risk. It is mentioned only because it adds to thalidomide's risk. Alone, it is not listed as a cause of thromboembolism, so without thalidomide it is unlikely to be responsible.

Evidence

Stoelting says tumours create a hypercoagulable state that some chemotherapies make worse. Thalidomide and lenalidomide carry especially high risk, more so with glucocorticoids and doxorubicin. Cisplatin and tamoxifen also raise risk, and tamoxifen specifically causes DVT, PE and stroke.

Sources: Stoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman treated for breast cancer develops a DVT. Of tamoxifen, doxorubicin and bleomycin, which is listed as thrombogenic?

Tamoxifen.

Is doxorubicin on its own listed as a cause of venous thromboembolism?

No; it only adds to thalidomide's risk.

Common misconception That doxorubicin alone causes thromboembolism

Report a problem with entry 68: Tamoxifen raises venous thromboembolism risk

Part 2069 / 129

Bleomycin causes pulmonary toxicity: pneumonitis and fibrosis

Bleomycin, the classic lung-toxic chemotherapy drug, causes pneumonitis that can progress to fibrosis; risk rises with total dose, age and poor renal function.

Why

Bleomycin kills cells by oxidative damage that breaks DNA, and lung tissue bears the same oxidant injury; hence its gravest, dose-related effect is pneumonitis that can scar into fibrosis, even though skin and mucosal effects are commoner. Risk rises beyond 250 mg total, over 40 years, and with creatinine clearance under 80 mL/min. High inspired oxygen was long blamed for worsening this injury; Stoelting notes newer evidence questions that but still advises the least oxygen needed, so titrate oxygen rather than withhold it.

The trap

Fluorouracil causes pulmonary fibrosis. The patient has colon cancer, and fluorouracil is the backbone of colorectal chemotherapy, so it feels like the drug being tested. Its usual toxicities are gut, mucosal and marrow, not lung. Whatever the patient's tumour, the chemotherapy drug known for pneumonitis and fibrosis is bleomycin.

Evidence

Review texts list pneumonitis and fibrosis after bleomycin, calling dose-related lung toxicity its most serious effect. Risk rises beyond 250 mg total, over 40 years, and with creatinine clearance under 80 mL/min. Keeping inspired oxygen low is still advised despite newer contrary evidence.

Sources: Mayo reviewStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A chemotherapy patient develops pneumonitis that progresses to fibrosis. Likely drug?

Bleomycin.

Which factors raise the risk of bleomycin lung toxicity?

Total dose over 250 mg, age over 40, poor renal function.

Report a problem with entry 69: Bleomycin causes pulmonary toxicity: pneumonitis and fibrosis

Part 2070 / 129

Insulin can provoke a seizure through hypoglycaemia

In a diabetic on insulin, insulin can cause seizures via hypoglycaemia, so check glucose in any fasting patient who has a fit.

Why

Insulin does not excite neurones itself. It lowers blood glucose, and the brain needs a steady glucose supply. As glucose falls, the EEG slows. At very low levels the EEG goes flat, and if this lasts, seizures and hippocampal damage follow. The risk rises when patients fast around surgery. Patients who have had many hypoglycaemic episodes can lose their warning symptoms, so a seizure may be the first sign that glucose is low.

The trap

Gabapentin provokes seizures normally. Gabapentin is tempting because it is the only neuroactive drug in the list, and stopping it suddenly can cause fits. At normal doses, though, it is an anticonvulsant and protects against seizures. The drug that actively provokes seizures is insulin, through hypoglycaemia.

Evidence

Insulin carries a risk of hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia (below 54 mg/dL) causes neuroglycopenia with confusion and seizures. Below 20 mg/dL the EEG goes flat, and if that level persists, seizures and hippocampal injury follow. Patients with repeated episodes may not notice symptoms.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A fasting diabetic on insulin has a fit before surgery. What do you check first?

Blood glucose; insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.

A fasting patient on gabapentin and insulin has a seizure; glucose is 34 mg/dL. Which drug provoked it?

Insulin, through hypoglycaemia.

Common misconception That gabapentin provokes seizures at normal doses

Report a problem with entry 70: Insulin can provoke a seizure through hypoglycaemia

Part 2071 / 129

Topical phenylephrine (nose drops) can cause severe hypertension with reflex bradycardia

If a child develops marked hypertension with a slow heart rate after nasal decongestant drops, suspect phenylephrine absorbed through the mucosa.

Why

Phenylephrine acts only on alpha-1 receptors and has no beta-1 activity, so it does not stimulate the heart directly. Applied to the nasal mucosa, it is absorbed into the circulation. There it constricts arterioles and blood pressure rises sharply. The heart slows as a reflex response to that pressure rise, not because the drug acts on the heart. Uncounted drops in a small child can therefore cause severe hypertension together with bradycardia.

The trap

Pseudoephedrine hypertension nose drops. Pseudoephedrine is a familiar decongestant, so it looks like the obvious culprit. But it is a mixed-acting sympathomimetic with beta effects, so it tends to speed the heart up rather than slow it. The slow rate points to a pure alpha agonist.

Evidence

Phenylephrine, an alpha-agonist topical vasoconstrictor sometimes mixed with lidocaine, should have a first dose of 500 mcg or less, and below 20 mcg/kg in children of 25 kg or less. It can cause severe hypertension; adverse effects include bradycardia.

Sources: Miller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 3-year-old becomes hypertensive with a slow pulse after decongestant nose drops. Which drug?

Phenylephrine absorbed through the nasal mucosa.

Why does phenylephrine slow the heart?

Baroreflex response to the pressure rise; no direct cardiac action.

Common misconception That pseudoephedrine is the likely culprit

Report a problem with entry 71: Topical phenylephrine (nose drops) can cause severe hypertension with reflex bradycardia

Part 2072 / 129

Room-temperature storage degrades succinylcholine the most

When relaxants sit unrefrigerated, pick succinylcholine as the one losing most potency; rocuronium and pancuronium have stated room-temperature shelf lives.

Why

Succinylcholine breaks down in solution. It does so faster when warm or alkaline and in stronger solutions, so its label demands refrigeration and Miller lists it among relaxants that lose potency with heat. Rocuronium and pancuronium are sturdier: rocuronium keeps at room temperature for 60 days and pancuronium for 6 months. A later stability study found succinylcholine's real room-temperature loss is slow, taking months before potency falls 10%. So the refrigeration rule is conservative, but it still marks succinylcholine as the relaxant most sensitive to warmth.

The trap

Rocuronium degrades most from heat. Rocuronium is tempting because its room-temperature allowance is shorter than pancuronium's and its label also calls for refrigeration. But that limit comes from breakdown caused by terminal sterilisation during manufacture, and it is a defined allowance. Succinylcholine is the relaxant whose potency is directly heat-labile.

Evidence

Outside the textbooks, the succinylcholine label requires refrigeration to keep potency, and a stability study found 10% loss takes months. Miller notes it loses potency with heat, and gives rocuronium 60 days and pancuronium 6 months at room temperature.

Sources: Outside our books: ANECTINE (succinylcholine chloride injection, USP) and QUELICIN (succinylcholine chloride injection, solution) - FDA-approved prescribing information (2010)Miller 10eOutside our books: Stability of succinylcholine solutions stored at room temperature studied by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2007)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which relaxant loses most potency when left out of the fridge?

Succinylcholine.

How long can rocuronium and pancuronium be kept at room temperature?

Rocuronium 60 days; pancuronium 6 months.

Report a problem with entry 72: Room-temperature storage degrades succinylcholine the most

Part 2073 / 129

Ketamine causes hallucinations and vivid dreams on emergence

Of multimodal analgesia drugs, ketamine causes hallucinations and vivid dreams, mostly on emergence; prior benzodiazepine administration reduces them.

Why

Ketamine suppresses the relay nuclei that pass visual and auditory signals up to the cortex. On waking, the patient misreads what they see and hear. This produces illusions, vivid dreams, dysphoria, fear, excitement or euphoria. These psychic reactions appear early after emergence and usually settle within hours. Larger doses make them more likely. They also occur with a postoperative ketamine infusion for pain, not only after a ketamine anaesthetic. Midazolam given beforehand blunts them.

The trap

Morphine causes vivid emergence hallucinations. Opioids are the usual suspects for postoperative confusion and sedation, so morphine feels like the safe pick. But hallucinations, dysphoria and vivid dreams are the side effects the texts list for ketamine used as a pain adjunct. That dissociative picture belongs to ketamine, not to the opioid.

Evidence

The texts list hallucinations, dysphoria and vivid dreams as side effects of postoperative ketamine infusion. The emergence reactions come from depressed visual and auditory relay nuclei and are dose dependent. Midazolam given beforehand may lessen them.

Sources: FaustMiller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
On emergence after multimodal analgesia, a patient reports vivid dreams and hallucinations. Which drug?

Ketamine.

Common misconception That morphine is the likely cause

How can ketamine emergence reactions be reduced?

A benzodiazepine such as midazolam given beforehand.

Report a problem with entry 73: Ketamine causes hallucinations and vivid dreams on emergence

Back to card 12Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsProlonged apnoea after succinylcholine

  1. 074Dibucaine number: normal 70-80, heterozygous atypical 40-60 (Barash) or 50-60 (Mayo), homozygous atypical 20-30
  2. 075Plasma cholinesterase activity: raised in obesity (shortens succinylcholine); lowered 20-30% (Barash) or 25-30% (Faust) in pregnancy and by liver disease, plasmapheresis and glucocorticoids (prolongs it)
Part 3074 / 129

Dibucaine number: normal 70-80, heterozygous atypical 40-60 (Barash) or 50-60 (Mayo), homozygous atypical 20-30

Dibucaine number is the percentage of enzyme inhibited. Normal homozygote 70–80; heterozygote 50–60 (inside Barash's 40–60); atypical homozygote below 30, so 20–30.

Why

Dibucaine is an amide local anaesthetic that strongly suppresses normal plasma cholinesterase but has little effect on the common atypical variant. The laboratory reports the percentage of enzyme activity suppressed: about 80% for normal enzyme and about 20% for atypical. A heterozygote carries one allele of each, so the value falls between them. Barash gives 40–60 and the Mayo review 50–60; 50–60 lies within both, so it is the safe answer. The test reflects enzyme quality, not quantity.

The trap

Atypical dibucaine number near zero. The atypical enzyme is called dibucaine-resistant, so people imagine almost no inhibition and a near-zero number. But the atypical homozygote's enzyme is still inhibited by roughly a fifth. That puts its value below 30, in the 20–30 band, not close to zero.

Evidence

Barash gives normal enzyme a value of 70–80 and the homozygote for the common abnormal allele a value below 30. Dibucaine inhibits normal enzyme by 80% and atypical by 20%. Barash puts heterozygotes at 40–60; the Mayo review puts them at 50–60.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Prolonged apnoea after succinylcholine; dibucaine number is 25. Genotype?

Homozygous atypical plasma cholinesterase.

Common misconception That the atypical homozygote has a near-zero number

What dibucaine number fits a heterozygous atypical patient?

50–60, within Barash's 40–60.

Report a problem with entry 74: Dibucaine number: normal 70-80, heterozygous atypical 40-60 (Barash) or 50-60 (Mayo), homozygous atypical 20-30

Part 3075 / 129

Plasma cholinesterase activity: raised in obesity (shortens succinylcholine); lowered 20-30% (Barash) or 25-30% (Faust) in pregnancy and by liver disease, plasmapheresis and glucocorticoids (prolongs it)

Pregnancy, liver disease, plasmapheresis and glucocorticoids lower plasma cholinesterase, which slightly prolongs suxamethonium. Obesity raises it, which shortens the block.

Why

How long suxamethonium lasts depends mainly on plasma cholinesterase activity and on the extracellular volume the drug spreads into. When enzyme activity falls, as in pregnancy, hepatic disease, plasmapheresis or glucocorticoid therapy, the drug stays longer. When activity rises, as in obesity, the drug is cleared faster. The two obstetric sources agree that activity falls in pregnancy and differ only in size: Barash gives 20–30% and Faust gives 25% to 30%. The ranges overlap, so a fall of about a quarter fits both, and the resulting prolongation is clinically trivial.

The trap

Cholinesterase activity rises during pregnancy. This is tempting because so much goes up in pregnancy, including plasma volume, cardiac output and oxygen consumption, so people assume every value rises. Cholinesterase goes the other way. Its activity falls, so suxamethonium lasts slightly longer, not shorter.

Evidence

Barash reports serum cholinesterase activity falls 20–30% at term; Faust reports a 25–30% fall from early pregnancy to the puerperium, clinically insignificant. Miller lists hepatic disease, plasmapheresis and glucocorticoids as causes of reduced activity. Activity is increased in obesity.

Sources: Barash 9eFaustMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Does plasma cholinesterase rise or fall in pregnancy?

Falls 20–30%; succinylcholine slightly prolonged.

Common misconception That cholinesterase rises in pregnancy

How does obesity change plasma cholinesterase and succinylcholine duration?

Activity rises, so the block is shorter.

Report a problem with entry 75: Plasma cholinesterase activity: raised in obesity (shortens succinylcholine); lowered 20-30% (Barash) or 25-30% (Faust) in pregnancy and by liver disease, plasmapheresis and glucocorticoids (prolongs it)

Back to card 13Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsBlood pressure crisis from a drug

  1. 076Hypertension and reflex bradycardia after phenylephrine eye drops: a direct vasodilator or alpha-blocker, never a beta-blocker
  2. 077Cocaine and amphetamines: a sympathetic surge with tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia and ischaemia; cocaine blocks catecholamine reuptake
  3. 078Stopping clonidine causes rebound hypertension
Part 3076 / 129

Hypertension and reflex bradycardia after phenylephrine eye drops: a direct vasodilator or alpha-blocker, never a beta-blocker

Hypertension with a slow pulse after phenylephrine eye drops: give a direct vasodilator or an alpha-blocker such as phentolamine, not a beta-blocker.

Why

Phenylephrine is a pure alpha agonist. Drops absorbed through the conjunctiva, the nasal mucosa or venous channels opened at surgery tighten the arteries and raise the pressure sharply. The slow heart rate is the baroreceptor reflex responding to that pressure. It is not the primary problem. Blocking alpha receptors, or relaxing vascular smooth muscle directly, reverses the vasoconstriction, and the reflex bradycardia then settles. A beta-blocker leaves the vasoconstriction in place and removes what cardiac drive remains. That deepens the bradycardia against a high afterload.

The trap

Esmolol manages phenylephrine hypertension safely. Esmolol is short-acting and easy to titrate, so it looks like a safe way to bring down a crisis pressure. But alpha-mediated vasoconstriction is driving the pressure. Beta-blockade does not relax the vessels, and with the heart already reflexively slowed it risks profound bradycardia or failure against high afterload.

Evidence

Treatment works best with a direct vasodilator or an alpha-antagonist such as phentolamine. Topical 10% drops can provoke dysrhythmias and myocardial ischaemia in coronary disease. Drops should not be instilled once surgery has opened venous channels, and 2.5% suits infants and the elderly.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After phenylephrine eye drops, blood pressure is 210/110 mmHg with a pulse of 45. Treatment?

Phentolamine or a direct vasodilator.

Why avoid esmolol for hypertension after phenylephrine eye drops?

It leaves vasoconstriction and deepens bradycardia against high afterload.

Common misconception That a titratable beta-blocker safely treats alpha-driven hypertension

Report a problem with entry 76: Hypertension and reflex bradycardia after phenylephrine eye drops: a direct vasodilator or alpha-blocker, never a beta-blocker

Part 3077 / 129

Cocaine and amphetamines: a sympathetic surge with tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia and ischaemia; cocaine blocks catecholamine reuptake

Acute cocaine or amphetamine use causes a sympathetic surge: hypertension, tachycardia, arrhythmia, ischaemia and higher anaesthetic need. Chronic amphetamine abuse depletes catecholamines, causing refractory hypotension.

Why

Noradrenaline stops acting mainly because it is pumped back into the nerve terminal. Cocaine blocks this pump, and so do amphetamines. Transmitter builds up at the receptor and the response is exaggerated, with faster heart rate, higher pressure, arrhythmia and ischaemia. Stoelting puts this picture in acute intoxication, when more anaesthetic is needed. With long-term abuse the catecholamine stores run down, so less anaesthetic is needed and hypotension may resist treatment. Across both phases, Miller lists stroke, cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia as lasting cardiovascular risks.

The trap

Hypotension from chronic stimulant resistance. Hypotension is tempting because long-term stimulant users can become resistant to vasopressors once their catecholamine stores are used up. But that belongs to chronic depletion and is not the defining risk of cocaine. The sources consistently name stroke, cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia for these users.

Evidence

Miller says cocaine and amphetamine users risk stroke, cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias, with uptake blockade causing hypertension, tachycardia and ischaemia. Stoelting links acute amphetamine intoxication to hypertension, tachycardia, hyperthermia and increased anaesthetic requirement; long-term abuse lowers requirement and causes refractory hypotension.

Sources: Miller 10eStoelting 8eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A recent cocaine user has hypertension, tachycardia and ST changes. Mechanism?

Blocked catecholamine reuptake: a sympathetic surge.

An acutely intoxicated amphetamine user stays tachycardic despite opioid. How is anaesthetic requirement changed?

Raised in acute intoxication.

Report a problem with entry 77: Cocaine and amphetamines: a sympathetic surge with tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia and ischaemia; cocaine blocks catecholamine reuptake

Part 3078 / 129

Stopping clonidine causes rebound hypertension

Keep chronic clonidine going through the perioperative period. Stopping it suddenly can cause severe rebound hypertension with tachycardia within 8 to 36 hours.

Why

Clonidine is an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist that holds sympathetic tone down while it is taken regularly. If it is stopped suddenly, that restraint is lost and noradrenaline surges out. The result is hypertension with a sympathetic picture: tachycardia, headache, anxiety, tremor and sweating. The risk is highest after high chronic doses, above 1.2 mg/day. A hypertensive patient who omits a drug the day before surgery and arrives with a crisis-level pressure should therefore make you suspect clonidine withdrawal first.

The trap

Verapamil rebound hypertension withdrawal. Verapamil is tempting because, like beta-blockers, it slows the heart, and people carry over the idea that rate-controlling drugs rebound when stopped. None of these sources describe a withdrawal crisis for it. The noradrenaline-surge rebound belongs to the alpha2 agonist.

Evidence

Barash describes severe rebound hypertension with sympathetic symptoms after abrupt withdrawal. The ACC/AHA guideline attributes it to a noradrenaline surge. The Mayo review times it at 8 to 36 hours, worse above 1.2 mg/day, and advises continuing clonidine before surgery.

Sources: Barash 9eAHA/ACC 2024 · §7.4Mayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man missed his antihypertensive yesterday and arrives with crisis-level pressure and tachycardia. Suspect?

Clonidine withdrawal.

How soon after abrupt stopping does clonidine rebound appear?

Within 8 to 36 hours; continue it perioperatively.

Report a problem with entry 78: Stopping clonidine causes rebound hypertension

Back to card 14Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsWhat prolongs or shortens the block

  1. 079Non-depolarising block is prolonged by old age, hypothermia, respiratory acidosis, magnesium, volatiles and aminoglycosides; shortened by hypercalcaemia
  2. 080Magnesium sulfate potentiates non-depolarising (and, per Barash, depolarising) block and blunts neostigmine reversal
  3. 081Respiratory acidosis opposes neostigmine reversal
  4. 082Residual block: youth and TIVA lower the risk; age, organ disease, antiseizure drugs, volatiles, acidosis and cold raise it
Part 3079 / 129

Non-depolarising block is prolonged by old age, hypothermia, respiratory acidosis, magnesium, volatiles and aminoglycosides; shortened by hypercalcaemia

Old age and dantrolene both prolong non-depolarising block, as do volatiles, aminoglycosides and magnesium; hypercalcaemia, as in hyperparathyroidism, shortens it and lowers sensitivity.

Why

Several agents make a competitive blocker work harder. Volatiles, aminoglycosides, magnesium and dantrolene all enhance it, so the same dose gives a deeper, longer block. Calcium works the other way and counters magnesium. A high calcium, as in hyperparathyroidism, therefore leaves the junction less sensitive, and the block wears off sooner. Older adults show longer-lasting block and need smaller maintenance doses. Absorbed echothiophate inhibits cholinesterase, so the drugs that enzyme breaks down, succinylcholine and mivacurium, last longer.

The trap

Hypercalcaemia shortens depolarising blockade. Succinylcholine tempts because it is the relaxant most linked to electrolyte hazards, so any calcium disturbance seems to point at it. But the shortened, less sensitive block that hypercalcaemia produces is described for non-depolarising agents such as the atracurium family, not for the depolarising drug.

Evidence

A review lists volatiles, aminoglycosides, magnesium and dantrolene among drugs that enhance non-depolarising block. It says the hypercalcaemia of hyperparathyroidism lowers sensitivity and shortens action. A major textbook reports longer duration and lower maintenance needs in older adults. Absorbed echothiophate prolongs succinylcholine and mivacurium.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An 82-year-old receives rocuronium. How does age change the block and the maintenance dose?

Longer-lasting block; smaller maintenance doses.

A patient uses echothiophate eye drops. Which relaxants last longer?

Succinylcholine and mivacurium, the cholinesterase substrates.

Common misconception That echothiophate prolongs non-depolarising block

Report a problem with entry 79: Non-depolarising block is prolonged by old age, hypothermia, respiratory acidosis, magnesium, volatiles and aminoglycosides; shortened by hypercalcaemia

Part 3080 / 129

Magnesium sulfate potentiates non-depolarising (and, per Barash, depolarising) block and blunts neostigmine reversal

With magnesium in preeclampsia, depolarising and non-depolarising relaxants give deeper, longer block and slower neostigmine reversal; use reduced doses, titrated to monitoring.

Why

Magnesium is a divalent cation that competes with calcium. At the motor nerve terminal it blocks the calcium entry that triggers acetylcholine release, so less transmitter reaches the endplate. It also dampens postsynaptic calcium-dependent function. With less acetylcholine to compete, the same relaxant dose gives a deeper, longer-lasting block. Neostigmine only works by letting more acetylcholine build up at the junction, so when release is suppressed it has less to work with and recovery is slower.

The trap

Floppy neonate expected magnesium effect. It is tempting because magnesium reaches the fetus and can weaken muscle. But the effect an anaesthetist must predict and plan for at therapeutic maternal levels is potentiated, prolonged relaxant block in the mother. A floppy neonate is a possible effect, not the routine expected finding.

Evidence

Miller describes clear potentiation of any non-depolarising relaxant, with longer recovery. It advises smaller doses guided by monitoring, because magnesium enhances both relaxant classes. Recovery with neostigmine is blunted. Barash attributes the potentiation to magnesium blocking calcium channels before and after the synapse.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A pre-eclamptic woman on magnesium needs rocuronium for caesarean. How do you dose it?

Reduced doses titrated to monitoring; block is deeper and longer.

Why does neostigmine reverse block poorly in a patient on magnesium?

Magnesium cuts acetylcholine release, leaving neostigmine less to work with.

Report a problem with entry 80: Magnesium sulfate potentiates non-depolarising (and, per Barash, depolarising) block and blunts neostigmine reversal

Part 3081 / 129

Respiratory acidosis opposes neostigmine reversal

Correct hypercarbia before giving neostigmine. Every source agrees respiratory acidosis impairs reversal; Miller adds metabolic alkalosis as a second antagonising state.

Why

All sources agree that a raised CO2 blunts neostigmine. Barash reasons that hypercarbia creates acidosis, which interferes with anticholinesterase action, and Miller's laboratory work found reversal needed nearly twice the neostigmine dose during respiratory acidosis. The books part company on metabolic disturbances. Barash extends the harm to acidosis of any cause; Miller's measurements showed metabolic acidosis made no difference while metabolic alkalosis impaired reversal. So treat hypoventilation first, accept metabolic alkalosis as a Miller-correct answer, and never let a metabolic-acidosis option decide a question.

The trap

Hyperkalaemia opposes neostigmine reversal. Hyperkalaemia tempts because potassium disturbances do alter reversal, but the books name the opposite direction: low potassium deepens block and weakens neostigmine. Raised potassium is not listed as opposing antagonism, so someone who remembers only 'potassium' picks the wrong disturbance.

Evidence

Barash says acidosis hinders anticholinesterases and that hypercarbia acts through acidosis. Miller cites laboratory data in which respiratory acidosis and metabolic alkalosis nearly doubled the neostigmine requirement, while respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis left it unchanged. Barash adds that hypokalaemia makes neostigmine less effective.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
End-tidal CO2 is high at the end of surgery and neostigmine is planned. First step?

Correct hypercarbia; respiratory acidosis impairs reversal.

Which metabolic state does Miller add as opposing neostigmine reversal?

Metabolic alkalosis.

Report a problem with entry 81: Respiratory acidosis opposes neostigmine reversal

Part 3082 / 129

Residual block: youth and TIVA lower the risk; age, organ disease, antiseizure drugs, volatiles, acidosis and cold raise it

Residual block risk falls with youth and TIVA; it rises with older age, renal or liver disease, antiseizure drugs, volatile agents, hypothermia and acidosis.

Why

Anything that prolongs relaxant action or increases the dose given raises risk. Older adults, and those with renal or hepatic dysfunction, handle non-depolarisers less well, so younger patients sit at the low-risk end. Volatile agents relax skeletal muscle themselves and cut relaxant requirement, so they add to residual weakness; TIVA lacks this effect. Chronic antiseizure therapy causes resistance, so larger doses are given, which is why these drugs appear on the risk list. Postoperative hypothermia and respiratory acidosis also raise risk.

The trap

Antiseizure drugs lower residual block. Chronic antiseizure therapy really does cause resistance to non-depolarisers, so it sounds protective. Because of that resistance, clinicians give larger doses. The extra drug is why these medications are listed among factors that raise residual block risk, not lower it.

Evidence

The patient factors listed as raising residual block are older age, renal or liver dysfunction and antiseizure medication. Inhalational maintenance carries more risk than TIVA, and postoperative hypothermia and respiratory acidosis add risk. Volatiles lower the relaxant dose needed.

Sources: Miller 10eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which maintenance technique lowers residual block risk: volatile or TIVA?

TIVA.

Does chronic antiseizure therapy lower the risk of residual block?

No; resistance prompts larger doses, raising risk.

Common misconception That antiseizure-drug resistance protects against residual block

Report a problem with entry 82: Residual block: youth and TIVA lower the risk; age, organ disease, antiseizure drugs, volatiles, acidosis and cold raise it

Back to card 15Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsApnoea from an opioid interaction

  1. 083Codeine is a prodrug made active by CYP2D6: ultra-rapid metabolisers make toxic morphine
  2. 084Name the enzyme of the drug in question: codeine needs CYP2D6, fentanyl is cleared by CYP3A4, methadone mainly by CYP2B6
  3. 085Preterm neonates are more sensitive to fentanyl: less plasma protein, bilirubin competing for binding sites, an immature blood-brain barrier and slower elimination
  4. 086Heat over a fentanyl patch increases its absorption
Part 3083 / 129

Codeine is a prodrug made active by CYP2D6: ultra-rapid metabolisers make toxic morphine

Codeine needs the enzyme CYP2D6 to become morphine; ultra-rapid metabolisers overproduce it, causing sedation in children after tonsillectomy and in breastfed neonates.

Why

Codeine has little effect itself; analgesia comes from morphine produced by the liver enzyme CYP2D6, which is the binding site in question, not an opioid receptor. The gene is polymorphic. Ultra-rapid metabolisers convert codeine quickly, so a standard dose produces excess morphine, causing sedation and respiratory depression. Children after adenotonsillectomy are already at risk, making codeine especially dangerous for them. An ultra-rapid-metabolising mother exposes her breastfed baby to excess morphine. Slow metabolisers make little morphine and get poor analgesia.

The trap

Extensive metabolisers convert codeine fastest. 'Extensive' sounds like the busiest enzyme, and one passage loosely links extensive metabolisers to making large amounts of morphine. In the four-group scheme, though, extensive means normal activity. The group with abnormally high conversion, and the one behind the reported neonatal harm, is ultra-rapid.

Evidence

CYP2D6 turns inactive codeine into active morphine. Slow metabolisers get weak analgesia and rapid metabolisers risk morphine toxicity. In children, the ultra-rapid phenotype and adenotonsillectomy are both named risks for opioid respiratory depression. Case reports include a lethargic breastfed neonate.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 5-year-old is very drowsy after codeine following tonsillectomy. Explanation?

Ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metaboliser making excess morphine.

Common misconception That extensive metabolisers are the high-conversion group

A patient gets almost no pain relief from codeine. Why?

Slow CYP2D6 metaboliser; little morphine is formed.

Report a problem with entry 83: Codeine is a prodrug made active by CYP2D6: ultra-rapid metabolisers make toxic morphine

Part 3084 / 129

Name the enzyme of the drug in question: codeine needs CYP2D6, fentanyl is cleared by CYP3A4, methadone mainly by CYP2B6

Name the enzyme that clears the drug in question: codeine CYP2D6, fentanyl CYP3A4, methadone mainly CYP2B6; fentanyl-on-methadone apnoea is additive opioid effect, named enzyme CYP3A4.

Why

Codeine is an inactive prodrug. CYP2D6 demethylates it to morphine, which binds the mu receptor far more avidly, so ultra-rapid metabolisers make excess morphine and depress breathing. Fentanyl uses a different isoform, CYP3A4, so inhibitors such as protease inhibitors keep it high for longer. For methadone, Barash names CYP2B6; the product label lists CYP3A4 alongside CYP2B6, and newer work ranks CYP2B6 first, so say mainly CYP2B6. Fentanyl added to methadone causes apnoea because two opioids sum, not through an enzyme; the enzyme belonging to fentanyl is CYP3A4.

The trap

CYP3A4 because of the fentanyl patch. CYP3A4 tempts because the patient wears a fentanyl patch and fentanyl is its substrate. But the patch dose was unchanged and no CYP3A4 inhibitor was added. The new drug was codeine, whose CYP2D6 conversion to morphine explains the drowsiness and slow breathing.

Evidence

Barash calls codeine an inactive prodrug converted to morphine by CYP2D6, lists ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolism among causes of opioid respiratory depression, and places methadone metabolism on CYP2B6. The Mayo review says protease inhibitors raise fentanyl levels through CYP3A4.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 58-year-old with an unchanged fentanyl patch is given codeine for a cough and becomes drowsy with slow breathing. Which enzyme explains it?

CYP2D6, converting codeine prodrug to morphine.

Common misconception That the fentanyl patch makes CYP3A4 the relevant enzyme

A methadone-maintained patient is given extra fentanyl and stops breathing. Is the mechanism enzymatic, and which enzyme belongs to fentanyl?

No, additive opioid effect; fentanyl is cleared by CYP3A4.

Report a problem with entry 84: Name the enzyme of the drug in question: codeine needs CYP2D6, fentanyl is cleared by CYP3A4, methadone mainly by CYP2B6

Part 3085 / 129

Preterm neonates are more sensitive to fentanyl: less plasma protein, bilirubin competing for binding sites, an immature blood-brain barrier and slower elimination

Apnoea after normal-dose fentanyl in preterm neonates means excess free drug: bilirubin competes for scarce binding protein, immature blood–brain barrier admits it, clearance is slow.

Why

Fentanyl is a basic drug binding mainly to α1-acid glycoprotein and albumin. The preterm liver makes little of either, so more fentanyl stays unbound. Raised bilirubin occupies the remaining binding sites, freeing still more. Free drug crosses an immature blood–brain barrier easily, and immature hepatic and renal handling slows elimination. All these effects act together: a standard weight-based dose produces a high brain concentration and apnoea. Any explanation based on more protein, faster clearance or a barrier excluding the drug has the physiology backwards.

The trap

Immature barrier reduces fentanyl penetration. It names a real preterm feature, the immature blood–brain barrier, so it feels correct. But it gets the direction wrong. An immature barrier lets more fentanyl into the brain, not less, and a drug kept out of the central nervous system could not cause apnoea.

Evidence

Barash attributes preterm drug sensitivity to scarce binding protein, bilirubin competing for binding sites, a poorly formed blood–brain barrier admitting more drug, and reduced metabolism and excretion. Low protein raises free synthetic opioid. Miller adds that neonatal opioid respiratory depression reflects easy brain entry.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 30-week preterm neonate becomes apnoeic after a standard fentanyl dose. Why?

More free drug: low protein, bilirubin competition, immature barrier.

Does an immature blood-brain barrier keep fentanyl out of the preterm brain?

No; it lets more fentanyl in.

Common misconception That the immature barrier excludes fentanyl

Report a problem with entry 85: Preterm neonates are more sensitive to fentanyl: less plasma protein, bilirubin competing for binding sites, an immature blood-brain barrier and slower elimination

Part 3086 / 129

Heat over a fentanyl patch increases its absorption

Keep warmers off a fentanyl patch, since heat raises uptake; continue it as baseline, or in major surgery swap for IV infusion, never just remove.

Why

A fentanyl patch delivers drug through the skin, so release depends on local conditions. Warming the skin raises permeation several-fold, and other perioperative changes can lower it unpredictably. Barash treats the patch as the baseline and usually continues it into theatre. Miller refines this for major surgery: because uptake is unpredictable, convert the patch dose to an equivalent intravenous background infusion, starting on arrival in theatre. Either way, the baseline continues. Heat over the patch is the reason for the swap.

The trap

Heat warming patch negligible absorption. It is tempting because the patch is a slow, constant-rate system and its analgesic effect builds over hours, so brief warming seems irrelevant. But delivery depends on skin conditions. Heat over the patch raises fentanyl permeation several-fold, so plasma levels can climb unexpectedly.

Evidence

Miller warns that warming blankets or heat packs on the patch multiply skin permeation several-fold. It advises removing patches in major surgery and converting to an intravenous morphine background infusion started on arrival in theatre. Barash notes patients usually keep the patch as their baseline.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A forced-air warmer is placed over a patient's fentanyl patch. Effect?

Fentanyl uptake rises; plasma levels may climb.

Common misconception That brief warming does not affect patch absorption

A patient with a fentanyl patch comes for surgery. Should the patch be removed?

No; continue it, or convert to IV infusion for major surgery.

Report a problem with entry 86: Heat over a fentanyl patch increases its absorption

Back to card 16Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsKinetic principles and routes

  1. 087Unionised drug is lipid soluble and crosses membranes and the placenta
  2. 088Fick's law: a thinner placental barrier raises drug transfer
  3. 089Local anaesthetic duration follows protein binding
  4. 090Phase II hepatic metabolism is conjugation
  5. 091Zero-order kinetics: plasma concentration exceeds the liver's enzyme capacity
  6. 092Waking after a propofol bolus is redistribution, not metabolism
  7. 093Potency is the ED50 position of the dose-response curve; efficacy is its maximum
  8. 094Tolerance: receptor adaptation and enzyme induction both reduce effect; neither book ranks one first
  9. 095Oral versus intravenous: first-pass hepatic metabolism
  10. 096Rectal route: upper rectum drains to the portal vein, lower rectum bypasses the liver
  11. 097Midazolam bioavailability: intramuscular highest, then intranasal; rectal and oral are low and overlap, rectal ahead on adult means only
Part 4087 / 129

Unionised drug is lipid soluble and crosses membranes and the placenta

The un-ionised form is lipid-soluble, crossing membranes including the placenta, and is reabsorbed by the renal tubules rather than excreted.

Why

A charged molecule cannot cross the lipid bilayer. Only the uncharged fraction diffuses across cell membranes, the blood–brain barrier and the placenta. Being lipid soluble, un-ionised drug filtered by the kidney is also reabsorbed by the renal tubule, so the body must convert it into polar metabolites to clear it. Drugs that remain ionised at body pH are excreted unchanged in urine. The ionised fraction depends on pKa relative to pH. When pKa equals pH, the drug is split evenly between both forms; this is the midpoint, not un-ionised.

The trap

Un-ionised drugs pass urine unchanged. Renal excretion sounds like a general drug property, so people tick it. It actually describes the opposite group. The tubule reabsorbs lipid-soluble un-ionised drug. Muscle relaxants and other drugs that are highly ionised at body pH are the ones passed unchanged in urine.

Evidence

Anaesthetic drugs are lipid soluble when un-ionised and are largely reabsorbed in the tubule; highly ionised drugs are cleared unchanged in urine. Only the un-ionised form crosses the placenta. pKa is the pH at which base and acid are equal.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which form of a drug crosses the placenta: ionised or un-ionised?

The un-ionised, lipid-soluble form.

Is filtered un-ionised drug excreted unchanged in the urine?

No; the renal tubule reabsorbs it.

Common misconception That un-ionised drug undergoes high renal excretion

Report a problem with entry 87: Unionised drug is lipid soluble and crosses membranes and the placenta

Part 4088 / 129

Fick's law: a thinner placental barrier raises drug transfer

Placental drug transfer follows Fick's law: it rises with thinner barrier, larger surface area, steeper free-drug gradient, higher lipid solubility and less ionisation.

Why

Most drugs cross the placenta by simple passive diffusion. Fick's law sets the rate from the exchange area, the free-drug gradient between mother and fetus, the drug's own diffusion constant and the barrier thickness. Area and gradient add to flux. Thickness is the distance a molecule must travel, so a thinner barrier lets it cross faster. The diffusion constant reflects the drug's chemistry. Lipid-soluble, un-ionised molecules pass through membrane lipid easily. Water-soluble or charged molecules are held back.

The trap

Inverse relationship between surface area and transfer. It is a Fick variable written the same way as the right answer, so someone who knows the equation but mixes up which terms go on top can pick it. Surface area is directly proportional to diffusion. Making it smaller reduces transfer.

Evidence

Barash says simple diffusion is the main route of placental drug transfer. The rate is directly proportional to exchange area, and barrier thickness is one of the equation's terms. The Mayo review says high lipid solubility, low ionisation and a large gradient all favour transfer.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
How does a thinner placental barrier change drug transfer?

Increases it; transfer is inversely related to thickness.

Does a smaller placental exchange area raise or lower drug transfer?

Lowers it; transfer is proportional to surface area.

Common misconception That a smaller exchange area increases transfer

Report a problem with entry 88: Fick's law: a thinner placental barrier raises drug transfer

Part 4089 / 129

Local anaesthetic duration follows protein binding

Protein binding is the main property that sets how long a local anaesthetic acts; pKa sets how fast it starts.

Why

A nerve is blocked only by the unbound drug that can cross the axonal membrane. Plasma and tissue proteins such as alpha-1 acid glycoprotein hold anaesthetic near the injection site and release it slowly. This keeps a supply of free drug available to the nerve for longer. Removal of drug from the site also limits duration: the faster it is taken away, the shorter the block. Agents that bind protein strongly therefore give longer blocks.

The trap

PKa determines local anaesthetic block duration. PKa is the property most often linked to local anaesthetic behaviour, so people pick it for every question. It controls how much drug is non-ionised at body pH, and so how quickly the block begins. It does not control how long the block lasts.

Evidence

Faust says that binding to alpha-1 acid glycoprotein and clearance from the injection site both affect duration. The block depends on how much free drug can diffuse into the nerve. A pKa near physiological pH speeds onset.

Sources: Faust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which property mainly sets how long a local anaesthetic block lasts?

Protein binding.

What does a local anaesthetic's pKa determine?

Speed of onset, not duration.

Common misconception That pKa controls block duration

Report a problem with entry 89: Local anaesthetic duration follows protein binding

Part 4090 / 129

Phase II hepatic metabolism is conjugation

Phase II means conjugation: the liver attaches a polar endogenous group to a drug or its Phase I product. Oxidation and reduction are Phase I.

Why

Phase I reactions, mostly driven by cytochrome P450, change the molecule itself by oxidising or reducing it, which often exposes a polar group. Phase II then attaches a hydrophilic endogenous group to that site. Glucuronic acid is the commonest, and the result is water-soluble and easier to excrete. Phase II is also called 'synthetic' because something is added to the molecule rather than its structure being rearranged. A drug that is already polar can skip Phase I and go straight to conjugation.

The trap

Oxidation is hepatic Phase II metabolism. Oxidation is the best-known hepatic reaction because of cytochrome P450 and its drug interactions, so people link it with liver metabolism in general. But oxidation changes the drug's own structure, which makes it a Phase I reaction, not a conjugation step.

Evidence

Textbooks call Phase II conjugation or synthetic reactions, which attach hydrophilic endogenous groups, most often glucuronic acid, to make the product water-soluble. Phase I covers oxidative and reductive reactions catalysed by cytochrome P450. A polar drug may be conjugated without Phase I first.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What reaction defines Phase II hepatic metabolism?

Conjugation, mostly glucuronidation.

Is cytochrome P450 oxidation a Phase II reaction?

No; oxidation is Phase I.

Common misconception That oxidation is a conjugation step

Report a problem with entry 90: Phase II hepatic metabolism is conjugation

Part 4091 / 129

Zero-order kinetics: plasma concentration exceeds the liver's enzyme capacity

Zero-order kinetics occur when drug concentration saturates liver enzymes, so a fixed amount, not fraction, is eliminated per unit time.

Why

Drugs are eliminated by enzymes or transport carriers, which have limited capacity. At low concentrations spare capacity exists, so the elimination rate rises with concentration and the body clears the same fraction per unit time. Once concentration exceeds this capacity, the enzymes are saturated and the rate stops rising, so a fixed quantity is cleared per unit time. Clearance and half-life then change with dose. If the dosing rate exceeds the liver's clearance capacity, plasma levels keep climbing and never reach steady state.

The trap

Renal excretion capacity determines enzyme saturation. This option sounds right because it also describes elimination being overwhelmed, and 'excretion' is a familiar pharmacokinetic word. It fails because the step that saturates is enzyme-driven metabolism, which depends on the liver's metabolic capacity. Comparing a concentration with renal excretion does not describe saturation of the eliminating system.

Evidence

Elimination depends on saturable enzymes or carriers. At high doses, removal shifts from a constant fraction to a constant amount per unit time (phenytoin is classic). If hepatic capacity is below the dosing rate, plasma levels keep rising and no steady state is reached.

Sources: Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A drug's plasma level saturates the liver's enzymes. How is it now eliminated?

Zero-order: a constant amount per unit time.

What happens if the dosing rate exceeds a drug's maximal hepatic clearance?

Plasma levels keep rising; no steady state is reached.

Report a problem with entry 91: Zero-order kinetics: plasma concentration exceeds the liver's enzyme capacity

Part 4092 / 129

Waking after a propofol bolus is redistribution, not metabolism

After a single propofol bolus, consciousness returns because drug redistributes from brain to muscle and fat; metabolism clears it later, not at waking.

Why

A lipophilic bolus reaches the brain first. Muscle and fat receive less blood flow, so they keep taking up drug for longer, and plasma levels fall below brain levels. The gradient then reverses. Propofol diffuses out of the brain into blood and moves on to those slower tissues, so the brain concentration falls below the hypnotic level quickly. Hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism act later. They control final elimination from the body, not the moment the patient wakes.

The trap

Propofol metabolism enables rapid brain clearance. It is tempting because propofol is known for quick, clear-headed recovery, which sounds like fast clearance. After one bolus, though, the brain level falls because drug shifts into other tissues well before metabolism removes much of it. Metabolism follows redistribution.

Evidence

The sources agree that propofol's quick offset after a bolus comes from redistribution, not fast metabolism. The drug moves into poorly perfused muscle and fat. A reversed brain-to-blood gradient drives it out of the brain, and hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism come afterwards.

Sources: FaustMayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Why does a patient wake within minutes of a single propofol bolus?

Redistribution from brain to muscle and fat.

Is metabolism the reason a patient wakes after one propofol bolus?

No; metabolism clears it later, after redistribution.

Common misconception That fast metabolism explains waking after a bolus

Report a problem with entry 92: Waking after a propofol bolus is redistribution, not metabolism

Part 4093 / 129

Potency is the ED50 position of the dose-response curve; efficacy is its maximum

Potency is judged by curve position on the dose axis: a lower ED50, further left, means greater potency. Efficacy is judged by plateau height.

Why

Potency tells you how much drug you need to reach half the maximal response. A curve shifted left gets there at a lower dose. Efficacy is how much effect the drug can produce once it occupies its receptors, and that sets the plateau. The two vary independently. A less potent full agonist still reaches the full maximum if you give enough. A partial agonist levels off below the maximum however much you give, because a bigger dose cannot overcome its limited intrinsic effect.

The trap

Potency determines peak drug effect plateau. The usual mistake is to think a more potent drug produces a bigger maximal effect. Potency only moves the curve left or right. It says nothing about the height of the plateau. A weaker full agonist can match a stronger one's peak, and a partial agonist can never reach it.

Evidence

Potency is expressed as the dose that produces an effect in 50% of subjects, the ED50. Efficacy is the maximum effect. A left-shifted curve with a small C50 means greater potency. A less potent full agonist still reaches Emax, but a partial agonist does not.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Drug A's dose-response curve lies to the left of drug B's. Which is more potent?

Drug A; a lower ED50 means greater potency.

Does the more potent of two full agonists give the bigger maximal effect?

No; efficacy, the plateau height, is separate from potency.

Common misconception That greater potency means a greater maximal effect

Report a problem with entry 93: Potency is the ED50 position of the dose-response curve; efficacy is its maximum

Part 4094 / 129

Tolerance: receptor adaptation and enzyme induction both reduce effect; neither book ranks one first

Anaesthetic tolerance arises from neuronal, receptor-level adaptation; enzyme induction is a separate pharmacokinetic route, developing with chronic prior drug exposure.

Why

Both books describe two routes to tolerance, and neither ranks one above the other overall. What decides between them is where the change happens. At the neurone, receptors desensitise, uncouple from G proteins and are internalised, and NMDA signalling becomes more sensitive, so the same concentration at the site does less. Opioid adaptation starts here, and this is the route that operates within an anaesthetic. In the liver, induced CYP450 enzymes speed up metabolism, so less drug reaches its target. That reflects the patient's earlier exposure, not the anaesthetic itself.

The trap

Enzyme induction causes acute anaesthetic tolerance. Enzyme induction is a genuine textbook cause of tolerance, so it looks like an equal contender. But it is pharmacokinetic: faster metabolism lowers how much drug reaches the target. Tolerance that arises during the anaesthetic is driven by adaptation that begins at the receptor, on the neurone.

Evidence

Barash names both enzyme induction and receptor desensitisation as causes of opioid tolerance. It defines kinetic tolerance as faster CYP450 metabolism, and dynamic tolerance as neuroadaptation through receptor downregulation, internalisation and G-protein uncoupling. Miller says opioid adaptation starts with direct modulation of receptor signalling.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During a long opioid anaesthetic, the same effect-site level does less. Main mechanism?

Neuronal adaptation at the receptor.

Common misconception That enzyme induction drives tolerance within an anaesthetic

A patient with heavy prior drug exposure clears a drug faster. Which tolerance route is this?

Enzyme induction: a pharmacokinetic route from chronic exposure.

Report a problem with entry 94: Tolerance: receptor adaptation and enzyme induction both reduce effect; neither book ranks one first

Part 4095 / 129

Oral versus intravenous: first-pass hepatic metabolism

When IV and oral effects of the same drug differ, blame first-pass hepatic metabolism: swallowed drug crosses gut wall and liver before reaching systemic circulation.

Why

A swallowed drug is absorbed from the small bowel into portal blood. It meets gut-wall enzymes and then the liver before any of it reaches the systemic circulation. When the liver extracts a drug avidly (extraction ratio above 0.7), much of the dose is removed on that single pass, so oral bioavailability falls. For morphine it drops to about 20–30%. An IV dose enters the systemic circulation directly and avoids this loss. Sublingual nitrates escape the first pass, so they need far smaller doses than oral ones.

The trap

Hepatic clearance creates first-pass effect orally. It is tempting because the liver drives both. But hepatic clearance acts on drug that is already in the systemic circulation, whatever route was used, so it removes IV and oral doses alike. Only the presystemic pass through gut and liver separates oral from IV.

Evidence

Oral absorption sends drug through gut mucosa and portal blood before reaching the systemic circulation, lowering bioavailability. High-extraction drugs (ratio above 0.7) lose much of an oral dose this way: oral morphine bioavailability is 20–30%, and oral nitrates need higher doses than sublingual.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Oral morphine is much weaker than the same IV dose. Why?

First-pass gut-wall and hepatic metabolism; oral bioavailability 20–30%.

Why can hepatic clearance alone not explain an oral versus IV difference?

It removes drug from either route once it is systemic.

Common misconception That systemic hepatic clearance explains the route difference

Report a problem with entry 95: Oral versus intravenous: first-pass hepatic metabolism

Part 4096 / 129

Rectal route: upper rectum drains to the portal vein, lower rectum bypasses the liver

Drug absorbed high in the rectum passes via the portal vein and liver first; drug absorbed low enters systemic veins directly, avoiding hepatic first-pass.

Why

Rectal venous drainage splits by level. The upper rectum drains through the superior rectal vein into the portal system, so drug absorbed there crosses the liver before it reaches the body. The middle and inferior rectal veins drain the lower rectum into the inferior vena cava, so drug absorbed there goes straight into the systemic circulation. Absorption is shared between the two beds, so the route escapes first-pass metabolism only in part. This is how the anaesthesia textbook explains rectal morphine's higher bioavailability than oral morphine.

The trap

Lower rectum drains into portal circulation. It is tempting because 'systemic circulation' and 'first pass' sound like correct rectal-route words. It reverses the anatomy, though. The lower rectum drains by the middle and inferior rectal veins to the vena cava, so the drug reaches the systemic circulation without going through the liver.

Evidence

A pharmacology review and an anatomy reference, both outside the core textbooks, put the upper rectum on portal drainage and the lower rectum on caval drainage. The anaesthesia textbook says rectal morphine's greater bioavailability may come from partly avoiding hepatic metabolism.

Sources: Outside our books: Rectal Drug Delivery in Children (review) — Frontiers in Pharmacology (2019)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A suppository is absorbed high in the rectum. Where does the drug go first?

Into the portal vein and through the liver.

How does drug absorbed in the lower rectum reach the circulation?

Middle and inferior rectal veins to the vena cava, bypassing the liver.

Common misconception That lower-rectal absorption passes through the liver first

Report a problem with entry 96: Rectal route: upper rectum drains to the portal vein, lower rectum bypasses the liver

Part 4097 / 129

Midazolam bioavailability: intramuscular highest, then intranasal; rectal and oral are low and overlap, rectal ahead on adult means only

Midazolam bioavailability: intramuscular, over 90%, beats intranasal, 74-76%; next comes rectal, mean 52%, above oral on adult means, although rectal and oral overlap.

Why

An intramuscular dose enters the circulation without meeting the liver first, so nearly all of it survives; the product label reports over 90%. A concentrated nasal spray reached 74-76% in Schrier's study, placing intranasal second. Swallowed tablets face high hepatic extraction, so Heizmann measured only 31-72%. Rectal absorption partly escapes that loss; Clausen found 40-65%, mean 52%. Rectal beats oral only on adult means: the ranges overlap, and a paediatric study reversed them. All of these figures come from outside the textbooks.

The trap

Intranasal first, oral above rectal. Intranasal acts fastest and oral is the usual premedication route, so people put intranasal first and oral above rectal. Measured bioavailability is highest after intramuscular injection, and intranasal comes second. On adult means rectal sits above oral, but the ranges overlap and paediatric data reverse it.

Evidence

These figures come from outside sources, not textbooks. The product label gives intramuscular bioavailability above 90%. Schrier's concentrated nasal spray gave 74-76%. Clausen found rectal bioavailability of 40-65%, mean 52%. Heizmann's tablets gave 31-72%, limited by high liver extraction.

Sources: Outside our books: MIDAZOLAM HYDROCHLORIDE injection, solution - FDA-approved prescribing information (2026)Outside our books: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new highly concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for conscious sedation (2017)Outside our books: Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and alpha-hydroxy-midazolam following rectal and intravenous administration (1988)Outside our books: Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of midazolam in man (1983)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 34-year-old needs sedation by a route that bypasses first-pass liver metabolism and gives the highest measured midazolam uptake, above 90%. Which route?

Intramuscular, over 90% bioavailability.

A colleague ranks midazolam routes by speed of onset, putting intranasal first and oral above rectal. By measured bioavailability, what is the actual order?

Intramuscular, then intranasal 74-76%, then rectal mean 52%, then oral; rectal and oral overlap.

Common misconception That the fastest-acting route has the highest bioavailability

Report a problem with entry 97: Midazolam bioavailability: intramuscular highest, then intranasal; rectal and oral are low and overlap, rectal ahead on adult means only

Back to card 17Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsContext-sensitive half-time

  1. 098Remifentanil's context-sensitive half-time stays about 3-5 minutes whatever the infusion length
  2. 099Fentanyl's context-sensitive half-time rises steeply with infusion duration
  3. 100Dexmedetomidine's context-sensitive half-time lengthens with infusion duration
  4. 101Propofol's context-sensitive half-time stays short even after long infusions
  5. 102Context-sensitive half-time: the context is infusion duration, and it predicts offset better than elimination half-life
Part 4098 / 129

Remifentanil's context-sensitive half-time stays about 3-5 minutes whatever the infusion length

Treat remifentanil's context-sensitive half-time as fixed at about 3 to 5 minutes, however long the infusion has run, because esterases clear it so fast.

Why

Context-sensitive half-time lengthens when a lipid-soluble drug builds up in poorly perfused tissue during a long infusion, then leaks back into plasma after it stops. Remifentanil has an ester link. Nonspecific esterases in blood and tissue hydrolyse it quickly, so any drug returning from tissue stores is removed almost at once. One text says the half-time rises minimally with duration; the others call it independent of duration. Both describe the same result: in practice it barely changes.

The trap

Plasma cholinesterase deficiency prolongs remifentanil action. The word ester makes people think of suxamethonium and its prolonged block when plasma cholinesterase is deficient. Remifentanil is broken down by nonspecific plasma and tissue esterases instead, so that deficiency does not lengthen its offset.

Evidence

The sources describe remifentanil's half-time as consistently short, 3 to 5 minutes, and barely affected by how long the infusion runs. They attribute this to rapid breakdown by nonspecific plasma esterases, which clears drug returning from tissues quickly.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After an 8-hour remifentanil infusion, what is its context-sensitive half-time?

About 3 to 5 minutes, as after a short infusion.

Does plasma cholinesterase deficiency slow the offset of remifentanil?

No; nonspecific blood and tissue esterases clear it.

Common misconception That cholinesterase deficiency prolongs remifentanil

Report a problem with entry 98: Remifentanil's context-sensitive half-time stays about 3-5 minutes whatever the infusion length

Part 4099 / 129

Fentanyl's context-sensitive half-time rises steeply with infusion duration

Fentanyl's context-sensitive half-time climbs steeply with infusion length: about 250 minutes after a 6-hour infusion, and longer than alfentanil, sufentanil or remifentanil.

Why

Context-sensitive half-time is how long plasma concentration takes to halve after an infusion stops, and the elimination half-life does not predict it. During a long fentanyl infusion the peripheral tissues fill with drug. Once the infusion stops, those stores keep replacing whatever the liver clears, so plasma levels fall slowly, more so after longer infusions. Barash's pharmacokinetics chapter gives fentanyl the shorter elimination half-life; its opioid chapter gives sufentanil the shorter. Either way, sufentanil's level halves sooner after an infusion. Remifentanil's value stays the same however long it runs.

The trap

Sufentanil, from longer elimination half-life. Sufentanil looks like the drug that should linger, since one widely quoted table gives it the longer elimination half-life. But elimination half-life does not predict offset after an infusion. Of these opioids, fentanyl shows the greatest context-sensitive half-time, since continued return from peripheral stores keeps topping up plasma, even once the infusion has run for just one hour.

Evidence

Modelled curves plot this half-time against infusion duration. Fentanyl's rises markedly as peripheral stores replace hepatically cleared drug, despite one chapter giving it a shorter elimination half-life than sufentanil. After a 1-hour infusion it is nearly 6 times alfentanil's or sufentanil's; remifentanil's is duration-independent.

Sources: Mayo reviewBarash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Of fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil and remifentanil, which takes about 250 minutes for plasma concentration to halve after a 6-hour infusion?

Fentanyl.

A tabulated elimination half-life is longer for sufentanil than fentanyl. Does that make sufentanil slower to wear off after a prolonged infusion?

No; fentanyl's peripheral stores make its context-sensitive half-time longer.

Common misconception That elimination half-life predicts offset after infusion

Report a problem with entry 99: Fentanyl's context-sensitive half-time rises steeply with infusion duration

Part 4100 / 129

Dexmedetomidine's context-sensitive half-time lengthens with infusion duration

Never give one half-time for dexmedetomidine. After a 10-minute infusion it is about 4 minutes; after an 8-hour infusion it is about 250 minutes.

Why

Half-time is a simulated figure: the time plasma concentration takes to halve once the infusion stops. After a short infusion, peripheral tissues hold little drug, so redistribution brings plasma levels down quickly. With longer infusions those tissues fill up and redistribution does less of the work. The fall then depends more and more on elimination, so the half-time climbs towards a plateau at steady state. The terminal elimination half-life is a separate, fixed figure. Do not confuse the two.

The trap

Context-sensitive half-time equals elimination half-life. Two hours is tempting because it matches the familiar elimination half-life of about 2 hours. But half-time measures something else. It is the time for plasma levels to halve after stopping, and it changes with how long the infusion ran, from minutes to hours.

Evidence

Dexmedetomidine's half-time is quoted as about 4 minutes when the infusion lasted 10 minutes, rising to 250 minutes when it lasted 8 hours. Its terminal elimination half-life is about 2 hours. Half-time grows with infusion length and levels off at steady state.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is dexmedetomidine's context-sensitive half-time after a 10-minute infusion?

About 4 minutes.

After an 8-hour dexmedetomidine infusion, how long until the plasma level halves?

About 250 minutes.

Common misconception That its 2-hour elimination half-life applies

Report a problem with entry 100: Dexmedetomidine's context-sensitive half-time lengthens with infusion duration

Part 4101 / 129

Propofol's context-sensitive half-time stays short even after long infusions

Propofol's context-sensitive half-time barely lengthens as the infusion goes on. Even after long infusions it remains below 40 minutes, far shorter than its elimination half-life.

Why

When an infusion stops, drug stored in peripheral tissues moves back into plasma and can keep the concentration up. With propofol, that returning drug is metabolised quickly, so plasma levels still fall fast. As a result the half-time grows only slightly with longer infusions, and recovery is quick and predictable. Thiopental does not behave this way: its half-time rises sharply after anything but a very short infusion. Propofol's long elimination half-life measures slow terminal washout, which is a different quantity.

The trap

Propofol context-sensitive half-time increases with infusions. It is tempting to give the elimination half-life, which runs to many hours, or to expect the half-time to grow with infusion length as thiopental's does. Neither is right. However long the infusion ran, propofol's plasma level halves quickly once it stops.

Evidence

One text says propofol's context-sensitive half-time stays below 40 minutes even after infusions lasting several hours, while its terminal half-life is 4 to 23.5 hours. Another says the reason is fast metabolism of drug coming back from tissues. Thiopental's half-time, by contrast, rises steeply.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After a 12-hour propofol infusion, how does its context-sensitive half-time compare with a short infusion?

Barely longer; it stays under 40 minutes.

Common misconception That propofol offset follows its long elimination half-life

Which agent's half-time rises sharply after all but a very short infusion: propofol or thiopental?

Thiopental.

Report a problem with entry 101: Propofol's context-sensitive half-time stays short even after long infusions

Part 4102 / 129

Context-sensitive half-time: the context is infusion duration, and it predicts offset better than elimination half-life

The 'context' is how long the infusion ran. Use context-sensitive half-time to predict recovery, and effect-site equilibration time to predict how quickly response begins.

Why

Elimination half-life is the time for plasma level to halve once distribution is complete. Clearance is the plasma volume cleared of drug per unit time. Neither accounts for redistribution. After a long infusion, drug returning from peripheral tissues delays the fall in plasma level, increasingly with longer infusions. Context-sensitive half-time captures this and best predicts recovery, though waking also depends on how far the level must fall. Effect-site equilibration time is how fast brain level catches up with blood, governing response onset.

The trap

Context-sensitive half-time predicts drug onset speed. Context-sensitive half-time is known as the better predictor, so it seems right for any question about prediction. But it describes how the level falls after an infusion stops, which is recovery. How quickly a dose takes effect depends on how fast blood and brain equilibrate, not on offset.

Evidence

Context-sensitive half-time is the time for plasma level to halve, the context being infusion duration. It lengthens with longer infusions, which elimination half-life cannot show. It is not the sole determinant of waking; effect-site equilibration half-time describes blood–brain equilibration.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A drug's half-time is quoted against a 'context'. What does that context measure?

The duration of the infusion before it was stopped.

Which kinetic quantity governs speed of onset after a bolus?

Equilibration time between blood and effect site.

Common misconception That context-sensitive half-time predicts onset

Report a problem with entry 102: Context-sensitive half-time: the context is infusion duration, and it predicts offset better than elimination half-life

Back to card 18Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsVolatile agents and gases

  1. 103Changes in ventilation and cardiac output alter FA/FI least for insoluble agents such as desflurane
  2. 104Blood-gas solubility: desflurane lowest, isoflurane intermediate
  3. 105Meyer-Overton: lipid solubility predicts potency
  4. 106Halothane lowers cardiac output dose-dependently
  5. 107Modern fluorinated volatiles are non-flammable, unlike cyclopropane
  6. 108Halothane hepatitis: the volatile to avoid
  7. 109Nitrous oxide raises cerebral blood flow; cerebral vessels still respond to carbon dioxide
  8. 110Sevoflurane leaves heart rate flat below about 1.5 MAC
  9. 111Desflurane forms the most carbon monoxide with dry absorbent
  10. 112Nitrous oxide causes diffusion hypoxia
Part 4103 / 129

Changes in ventilation and cardiac output alter FA/FI least for insoluble agents such as desflurane

Changes in ventilation or cardiac output alter the rise of FA/FI most for soluble agents and least for the least soluble agent, desflurane.

Why

The alveolar fraction lags behind the inspired fraction because blood keeps removing agent from the alveoli. How much blood removes depends on how soluble the agent is and how much blood passes through the lungs. A soluble agent is removed in large amounts, so more ventilation or less pulmonary blood flow changes its alveolar level a lot. An insoluble agent is barely taken up, so its FA/FI rises quickly anyway. Changing ventilation or cardiac output then has little room left to speed it up.

The trap

Isoflurane resists ventilation-induced FA/FI changes. Isoflurane is less soluble than halothane or enflurane and is seen as a modern agent, so it seems a likely pick. But it is still much more soluble in blood than desflurane. Its uptake stays large enough for ventilation and cardiac output to change its FA/FI noticeably.

Evidence

Barash says ventilation and cardiac output change the wash-in of poorly soluble agents less than that of soluble ones. Faust says poorly soluble agents rise fast whatever the cardiac output, and soluble agents are affected most. Mayo explains that more ventilation offsets uptake into blood.

Sources: Barash 9eFaustMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Raising ventilation barely speeds the alveolar rise of which agent: desflurane or halothane?

Desflurane, the least soluble.

For which agents do changes in ventilation and cardiac output alter FA/FI most?

The more soluble agents.

Report a problem with entry 103: Changes in ventilation and cardiac output alter FA/FI least for insoluble agents such as desflurane

Part 4104 / 129

Blood-gas solubility: desflurane lowest, isoflurane intermediate

Rank blood:gas solubility desflurane, then nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane; desflurane is the lowest and isoflurane sits in the middle.

Why

Blood solubility sets how much agent the blood takes up from the alveoli before partial pressure can rise. A poorly soluble agent fills the blood quickly, so the alveolar concentration soon approaches the inspired one. That gives fast induction and fast wash-out. A highly soluble agent builds a large store in blood, which slows both. Different books quote slightly different decimals. Every table still puts desflurane just below nitrous oxide, and isoflurane between sevoflurane and halothane.

The trap

Nitrous oxide has lowest blood solubility. Nitrous oxide is the classic example of an insoluble, fast-onset gas, so people reach for it. Its blood:gas coefficient is almost the same as desflurane's. However, every source lists it slightly higher, so desflurane is the lowest.

Evidence

At body temperature, desflurane has the lowest coefficient (0.45) and nitrous oxide is next (0.47). Sevoflurane (0.65), isoflurane (1.4) and halothane (2.5) follow. Isoflurane's blood solubility lies between sevoflurane's and halothane's. The alveolar fraction rises faster with less soluble agents.

Sources: Mayo reviewMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Rank desflurane and nitrous oxide by blood:gas partition coefficient.

Desflurane 0.45 sits just under nitrous oxide 0.47.

Common misconception That nitrous oxide is the least soluble agent

Among sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane, which has the intermediate blood:gas coefficient?

Isoflurane, 1.4.

Report a problem with entry 104: Blood-gas solubility: desflurane lowest, isoflurane intermediate

Part 4105 / 129

Meyer-Overton: lipid solubility predicts potency

Meyer–Overton: the more lipid-soluble an inhaled agent (higher oil:gas partition coefficient), the more potent it is, so its MAC is lower.

Why

Potency is judged by MAC, the alveolar concentration preventing movement in half of patients. An agent that dissolves readily in fat reaches an effective concentration at its site of action at a lower alveolar concentration, so it needs less to work. This holds for many chemically unrelated agents across a 70,000-fold range of potency, and was once taken as proof that membrane lipids are the target. Later work found potency also tracks inhibition of a protein enzyme. The rule therefore predicts potency but does not identify where anaesthetics act.

The trap

Meyer-Overton lipid rule predicts effect type. Meyer–Overton is often described as a theory of how anaesthetics act, so 'effect' sounds right. The rule is quantitative, though. It links lipid solubility to how much agent is needed, which is MAC or potency. It does not describe the kind or size of the effect produced.

Evidence

MAC falls as lipid solubility rises, so potency increases with the oil:gas coefficient over a 70,000-fold range. Potency also correlates with inhibition of a protein enzyme, which supports protein targets rather than lipids.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An inhaled agent has a high oil:gas coefficient. What does that predict about its MAC?

A low MAC: greater potency.

Does the Meyer–Overton rule show where anaesthetics act?

No; it predicts potency, not the site of action.

Report a problem with entry 105: Meyer-Overton: lipid solubility predicts potency

Part 4106 / 129

Halothane lowers cardiac output dose-dependently

If asked which volatile agent lowers cardiac output as the dose rises, pick halothane. All volatiles lower output a little, but halothane lowers it most.

Why

Halothane depresses the heart muscle directly. Each rise in dose weakens contraction further, so output falls clearly. Isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane lower blood pressure mainly by reducing vascular resistance, so output tends to hold. Both statements are true. Miller says volatiles as a class reduce pressure and output with dose. Mayo notes that halothane is the agent whose output falls clearly. So the class effect is real, but it matters clinically mostly with halothane: 'halothane most', not 'halothane only'.

The trap

Isoflurane reduces cardiac output dose-dependently. Isoflurane is tempting because it causes dose-related hypotension and is named as a strong arterial dilator. But that hypotension comes from lower vascular resistance, not a weaker heart. Cardiac output tends to be maintained, unlike with halothane's direct depression of the heart muscle.

Evidence

Miller names halothane as the inhaled agent with the largest fall in cardiac output, and says volatiles as a class lower pressure and output with dose. Mayo says the three newer agents tend to preserve output and lower pressure mainly through reduced vascular resistance.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which volatile agent lowers cardiac output most as its dose rises?

Halothane.

Isoflurane causes dose-related hypotension. By what main mechanism?

Lower vascular resistance; cardiac output tends to hold.

Common misconception That isoflurane hypotension reflects a weakened heart

Report a problem with entry 106: Halothane lowers cardiac output dose-dependently

Part 4107 / 129

Modern fluorinated volatiles are non-flammable, unlike cyclopropane

When asked what fluorinated volatiles gained over cyclopropane, answer non-flammability. Cyclopropane was explosive; fluorinated agents do not burn.

Why

Fluorine forms very strong bonds with carbon, and heat or chemical attack cannot easily break them. A fluorinated anaesthetic molecule therefore does not burn. Cyclopropane, like ether and the other potent agents of its era (except chloroform), formed explosive mixtures in the operating theatre. Every spark from static electricity was a risk to the patient and the anaesthetist. Replacing these agents with fluorinated ones removed that danger. This is why the fluorinated agents are described as having transformed inhalational anaesthesia.

The trap

Potency improvement distinguished fluorinated volatile agents. Newer drugs feel like they should simply be stronger, so potency is an easy guess. But the history describes cyclopropane itself as a potent anaesthetic. What set the fluorinated agents apart, and changed practice, was that they would not burn. Potency was never the defining advance.

Evidence

Every potent anaesthetic of the cyclopropane era except chloroform was explosive. Fire in the operating room was first a concern because of flammable volatile agents such as cyclopropane and ether. Fluorinated hydrocarbons were non-flammable and transformed inhalational anaesthesia.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What advance did fluorinated volatile agents bring over cyclopropane?

Non-flammability.

Common misconception That the advance was greater potency

Why do fluorinated anaesthetic molecules not burn?

Very strong carbon-fluorine bonds resist breakdown.

Report a problem with entry 107: Modern fluorinated volatiles are non-flammable, unlike cyclopropane

Part 4108 / 129

Halothane hepatitis: the volatile to avoid

When post-anaesthetic hepatitis is immune-mediated, blame halothane. Its risk is by far the highest, and sevoflurane forms none of the causative metabolites.

Why

Oxidative metabolism of a volatile agent produces a reactive trifluoroacetyl metabolite, which binds hepatocyte proteins and makes them foreign antigens. Antibodies form against these altered proteins and attack the liver, sometimes fulminantly. Rash, eosinophilia and the link with repeated exposure indicate an immune process. Risk rises with the extent of oxidation: halothane is oxidised most, then enflurane, isoflurane and desflurane in falling order. Sevoflurane is metabolised by a different route and forms no such antigen.

The trap

Isoflurane causes hepatitis like halothane does. Isoflurane produces the same kind of trifluoroacetyl metabolite and has rare case reports of liver failure, so it can look like the answer. But very little of it is metabolised. That makes the immune hepatitis minimal with isoflurane, while halothane is the classic cause.

Evidence

Patients with halothane hepatitis have IgG antibodies against liver proteins altered by halothane's trifluoroacetyl metabolite. The expected incidence is greatest after halothane and falls with enflurane and then isoflurane. Sevoflurane forms none of these oxidative metabolites.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Fulminant hepatitis with rash and eosinophilia follows repeated volatile anaesthetics. Classic culprit?

Halothane.

Which volatile forms none of the trifluoroacetyl antigen behind immune hepatitis?

Sevoflurane.

Report a problem with entry 108: Halothane hepatitis: the volatile to avoid

Part 4109 / 129

Nitrous oxide raises cerebral blood flow; cerebral vessels still respond to carbon dioxide

Nitrous oxide alone raises cerebral blood flow by direct vasodilation. Cerebral vessels still respond to CO2; N2O blunts only the breathing response to CO2.

Why

Nitrous oxide directly dilates cerebral vessels while barely changing cerebral oxygen consumption, so flow rises beyond metabolic need. The rise is greatest when N2O is given alone and smallest with opioids, propofol or benzodiazepines. Inhaled agents do not abolish arteriolar reactivity to carbon dioxide: low CO2 still constricts and high CO2 still dilates. N2O does depress the brainstem's ventilatory response to CO2 and hypoxia, but this is a respiratory effect, not a cerebrovascular one.

The trap

Nitrous oxide causes no cerebral vasodilation. Nitrous oxide seems weak and inert, so a sedation dose feels unlikely to change blood flow in the brain. In fact it directly widens cerebral vessels, and the effect is largest exactly when it is given alone, with no intravenous agent to reduce it.

Evidence

Textbooks describe nitrous oxide as a direct cerebral vasodilator with little effect on cerebral oxygen consumption, most marked when used alone. Inhaled agents preserve cerebral CO2 responsiveness, whereas N2O blunts the ventilatory response to CO2 and hypoxia.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Nitrous oxide alone is used for sedation. Effect on cerebral blood flow?

Raised, by direct cerebral vasodilation.

Common misconception That nitrous oxide is too weak to change cerebral flow

Under nitrous oxide, do cerebral vessels still respond to CO2?

Yes; only the breathing response to CO2 is blunted.

Report a problem with entry 109: Nitrous oxide raises cerebral blood flow; cerebral vessels still respond to carbon dioxide

Part 4110 / 129

Sevoflurane leaves heart rate flat below about 1.5 MAC

For sevoflurane, expect heart rate to stay essentially unchanged below 1.5 MAC. Tachycardia appears only at concentrations beyond that, unlike with desflurane or isoflurane.

Why

Faust says volatile agents as a class may raise heart rate slightly from about 1 MAC. It adds a separate transient tachycardia with desflurane and, less so, isoflurane: their pungency irritates airway receptors when the concentration climbs quickly, which raises sympathetic tone. Faust does not name sevoflurane for this. Barash's volunteer data are specific to sevoflurane, which barely changed heart rate below 1.5 MAC. The figure for the individual agent takes priority over the general class statement, so with sevoflurane a rise in heart rate belongs above 1.5 MAC.

The trap

Sevoflurane raises heart rate above 1 MAC. That figure looks appealing because it exceeds roughly 1 MAC, where volatile anaesthetics may slightly raise heart rate. However, Barash's volunteer data show little or no heart rate change with sevoflurane below 1.5 MAC, so this figure remains within the stable range.

Evidence

Inhaled anaesthetics can slightly raise heart rate from about 1 MAC. Desflurane causes a short, pronounced tachycardia through airway irritation, isoflurane less so. In volunteers, sevoflurane produced little or no heart rate change below 1.5 MAC.

Sources: Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Below what MAC does sevoflurane leave heart rate essentially unchanged?

About 1.5 MAC.

Which volatiles cause a transient tachycardia from airway irritation when concentration rises fast?

Desflurane, and less so isoflurane; not sevoflurane.

Report a problem with entry 110: Sevoflurane leaves heart rate flat below about 1.5 MAC

Part 4111 / 129

Desflurane forms the most carbon monoxide with dry absorbent

Desflurane produces the most carbon monoxide with dried-out absorbent. Enflurane and isoflurane produce less, and sevoflurane and halothane produce effectively none.

Why

Carbon monoxide comes from the breakdown of ethers that carry a difluoromethyl group, and only when the absorbent is almost completely dry. Desflurane, enflurane and isoflurane all have this group, and the amount of carbon monoxide rises with the agent's concentration in the circuit. Desflurane heads the list. Sevoflurane and halothane also break down in strong base, but they form other products, not carbon monoxide. Sevoflurane's absorbent hazards are compound A and heat.

The trap

Sevoflurane forms most carbon monoxide with absorbent. Sevoflurane is the agent most linked with absorbent reactions. It forms compound A and gives the hottest reaction with dry absorbent, which has caused fires. It has no difluoromethyl group, though, so it forms little or no carbon monoxide. Heat and carbon monoxide are separate hazards.

Evidence

Barash ranks carbon monoxide output for equal MAC multiples as desflurane, then enflurane, then isoflurane, with halothane and sevoflurane least. Miller's says only difluoromethyl ethers form it and that nearly dry absorbent is required. Halothane and sevoflurane form none, although sevoflurane generates the most heat.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
With dried-out absorbent, which volatile forms the most carbon monoxide?

Desflurane.

Does sevoflurane form carbon monoxide with dry absorbent?

Little or none; its hazards are compound A and heat.

Common misconception That sevoflurane is the main carbon monoxide source

Report a problem with entry 111: Desflurane forms the most carbon monoxide with dry absorbent

Part 4112 / 129

Nitrous oxide causes diffusion hypoxia

Nitrous oxide causes diffusion hypoxia; on stopping it, give 100% oxygen briefly before reducing to a lower oxygen fraction or room air.

Why

During recovery, a large volume of dissolved nitrous oxide leaves the blood and floods the alveoli. Because it was given at high concentrations, this outflow dilutes alveolar oxygen and carbon dioxide. The low alveolar oxygen causes hypoxaemia. The low alveolar carbon dioxide weakens the drive to breathe, so ventilation falls and the hypoxaemia gets worse. Breathing 100% oxygen for a short time during this washout keeps alveolar oxygen high while the dilution is at its greatest.

The trap

Desflurane causes diffusion hypoxia on emergence. Desflurane's rapid washout on emergence tempts people to link it with diffusion hypoxia. However, that effect requires a very large volume of gas flooding the alveoli. Only nitrous oxide does this, as it is given at concentrations high enough to dilute alveolar oxygen.

Evidence

During recovery, high-concentration nitrous oxide washing out of the blood lowers alveolar oxygen and carbon dioxide. Low oxygen can cause hypoxaemia; low carbon dioxide can depress breathing. Give brief 100% oxygen before stepping down to a lower oxygen fraction or room air.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
At the end of a nitrous oxide anaesthetic, saturation falls on room air. Cause?

Diffusion hypoxia.

Common misconception That desflurane washout causes diffusion hypoxia

How do you prevent diffusion hypoxia after stopping nitrous oxide?

Give 100% oxygen briefly.

Report a problem with entry 112: Nitrous oxide causes diffusion hypoxia

Back to card 19Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsDrug, class and receptor

  1. 113Antiarrhythmic classes: what each blocks, its drugs, and the name clues
  2. 114Antiarrhythmic classes: II beta-blockers, III amiodarone, IV calcium-channel blockers
  3. 115Ethacrynic acid is a loop diuretic
  4. 116Nalbuphine is a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist
  5. 117Milrinone inhibits phosphodiesterase III
  6. 118Hydralazine is a direct arteriolar vasodilator whose reflex tachycardia can provoke ischaemia; not for hypertension with ischaemic heart disease
  7. 119Sarin and nerve agents inhibit acetylcholinesterase
  8. 120Relaxant classes: -curonium drugs are aminosteroids, -curium drugs benzylisoquinoliniums
  9. 121Adrenergic selectivity: phenylephrine alpha-1; ephedrine mixed and mainly indirect; isoprenaline (isoproterenol) the most potent beta agonist; noradrenaline alpha over beta
  10. 122Drugs that desensitise the nicotinic receptor: volatiles, ethanol, barbiturates, local anaesthetics such as lidocaine, cocaine, anticholinesterases
  11. 123Gabapentin acts on the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels
  12. 124Ketamine: dissociative anaesthesia, NMDA antagonist, bronchodilator, more salivation
  13. 125ACE inhibitors: natriuresis, lower afterload, higher renal blood flow
  14. 126Fenoldopam is a dopamine-1 agonist alternative to nitroprusside
  15. 127Nitroprusside: potent arterial and venous dilator; cyanide toxicity above 1 mg/kg within 2 hours or 0.5 mg/kg/h over 24 hours
  16. 128Anticholinesterases also act on the motor nerve ending: longer terminal action potential, repetitive firing
  17. 129Autonomic transmitters: postganglionic sympathetic fibres release noradrenaline; the heart's parasympathetic receptor is muscarinic (M2)
Part 4113 / 129

Antiarrhythmic classes: what each blocks, its drugs, and the name clues

Match target to class: I sodium, '-cain-', Ic strongest and Ib weakest; II beta-blockers, '-olol'; III potassium, '-ilide', sotalol, amiodarone; IV verapamil, diltiazem.

Why

Class I drugs slow the phase 0 sodium upstroke, widening QRS. Potency runs Ic above Ia above Ib, so Ic markedly widens QRS while Ib barely affects normal tissue. Ia also lengthens the action potential, raising QT. Class II blunts sympathetic drive to the nodes, slowing rate and AV conduction. Class III delays repolarisation through potassium blockade, prolonging QT; sotalol also blocks beta-receptors yet is filed as III. Class IV slows the AV node, lengthening PR. Adenosine, digoxin and magnesium sit outside the scheme.

The trap

Sotalol is Class II antiarrhythmic agent. The '-olol' ending really does mark a beta-blocker, and sotalol does block beta-receptors, so class II feels automatic. But its defining action is potassium-channel blockade, which lengthens repolarisation and QT. That is why it is grouped with amiodarone and dofetilide as class III.

Evidence

Outside the local books, a pharmacology review, a reclassification paper and the drug-name stem list give the sodium-block potency order, sotalol's beta and potassium blockade within class III, and the name stems '-cain-' and '-ilide'; a local textbook confirms verapamil as class IV, prolonging PR.

Sources: Outside our books: Antiarrhythmic Medications (2024)Outside our books: Modernized Classification of Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Drugs (2018)Outside our books: USAN stem list (cumulative) and WHO INN Stem Book 2018: drug-name stems (2018)Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which class I subgroup blocks sodium channels most strongly, widening QRS markedly?

Class Ic: flecainide, propafenone.

Sotalol ends in -olol. Which Vaughan Williams class is it?

Class III; potassium block dominates.

Common misconception That the -olol ending makes sotalol class II

Report a problem with entry 113: Antiarrhythmic classes: what each blocks, its drugs, and the name clues

Part 4114 / 129

Antiarrhythmic classes: II beta-blockers, III amiodarone, IV calcium-channel blockers

Class II means beta-blockers such as esmolol; class III means amiodarone and bretylium; class IV means diltiazem and verapamil, the non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers.

Why

Each class names a drug's main target. Esmolol is a short-acting β1-selective blocker, and Lei's modernised scheme keeps beta-blockers such as carvedilol in class II. Amiodarone chiefly blocks potassium channels, lengthening repolarisation and refractoriness, so it sits in class III although it also blocks sodium and calcium channels and β-receptors; peer-reviewed sources outside these books place bretylium in class III as well. Diltiazem and verapamil block slow calcium channels at the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes, slowing nodal conduction, which defines class IV.

The trap

Amiodarone is Class II antiarrhythmic. Amiodarone is tempting for class II because it also blocks β-receptors and acts across every class. Its dominant action, though, is potassium-channel blockade that prolongs repolarisation, so it is filed as class III; class II is reserved for drugs whose main action is β-blockade, such as esmolol.

Evidence

Jooma describes esmolol as an ultra-short-acting β1-selective blocker; Lei's revised scheme labels carvedilol class IIa; Stoelting calls amiodarone a class 3 antidysrhythmic; StatPearls lists diltiazem and verapamil as class IV non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers that slow atrioventricular nodal conduction.

Sources: Outside our books: Antiarrhythmic drugs (2023)Outside our books: Modernized Classification of Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Drugs (2018)Stoelting 8eOutside our books: Antiarrhythmic Medications (2024)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which antiarrhythmic class do diltiazem and verapamil belong to?

Class IV: nodal calcium-channel blockers.

Amiodarone also blocks beta-receptors. Which class is it filed under?

Class III; potassium blockade dominates.

Common misconception That amiodarone's beta block makes it class II

Report a problem with entry 114: Antiarrhythmic classes: II beta-blockers, III amiodarone, IV calcium-channel blockers

Part 4115 / 129

Ethacrynic acid is a loop diuretic

Ethacrynic acid is a loop diuretic. It is the only loop agent without a sulfonamide group, so recognise it despite its unfamiliar name.

Why

Diuretics are classed by how they act, not by chemical family. Ethacrynic acid belongs with furosemide, bumetanide and torsemide. Its product label applies loop-diuretic precautions to it, such as magnesium wasting. It does not work by blocking carbonic anhydrase; it acts through sulfhydryl binding. Its structure sets it apart because it has no sulfonamide. That makes it the alternative loop agent when a non-sulfonamide drug is needed.

The trap

Indapamide is a loop diuretic. Indapamide is a familiar sulfonamide-type diuretic used for hypertension, and its chemistry looks like furosemide's, so it feels like the loop answer. It is actually a thiazide-like agent that acts further along the nephron. The loop agent here is the odd, sulfonamide-free acid.

Evidence

This comes from outside the anaesthesia textbooks. A paediatric pharmacotherapy paper calls ethacrynic acid a loop diuretic that differs from the others by having no sulfonamide group. Its product label says it does not act through carbonic anhydrase and warns of loop-diuretic magnesium loss.

Sources: Outside our books: Ethacrynic Acid Continuous Infusions in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients (2014)Outside our books: EDECRIN (ethacrynic acid) tablet / SODIUM EDECRIN (ethacrynate sodium) powder, for solution - FDA-approved prescribing information (2020)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient needs a loop diuretic without a sulfonamide group. Which agent?

Ethacrynic acid.

Is indapamide a loop diuretic?

No; it is a thiazide-like agent.

Common misconception That indapamide is a loop diuretic

Report a problem with entry 115: Ethacrynic acid is a loop diuretic

Part 4116 / 129

Nalbuphine is a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist

Nalbuphine is a mixed agonist–antagonist. It blocks μ-receptors and stimulates κ-receptors, so its analgesia has a ceiling and it can reverse μ-opioid side effects.

Why

Nalbuphine has the same basic structure as naloxone and oxymorphone. At the μ-receptor it binds without activating it, which blocks other opioids there. At the κ-receptor it acts as an agonist, and that produces analgesia. Because the μ route is blocked, both pain relief and breathing depression level off as the dose rises. The same μ blockade lets small doses undo μ-agonist side effects, such as respiratory depression or itch from neuraxial opioids, while some κ-driven analgesia remains. Buprenorphine, butorphanol and pentazocine belong to the same class.

The trap

Tramadol is mixed opioid agonist-antagonist. Tramadol is tempting because it is an atypical opioid with a second, non-opioid action. That second action is inhibition of monoamine reuptake, not receptor blockade. At opioid receptors tramadol only acts as an agonist, so it cannot antagonise μ effects.

Evidence

A major textbook calls nalbuphine an agonist–antagonist that is related to naloxone, blocks μ-receptors and stimulates κ-receptors. Review texts note that its analgesia and respiratory depression both reach a ceiling. It is used to reverse opioid respiratory depression and to treat pruritus from neuraxial opioids.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Itch follows neuraxial morphine. Which mixed agonist–antagonist can relieve it while keeping some analgesia?

Nalbuphine.

Why does nalbuphine's analgesia level off as the dose rises?

It blocks μ-receptors; analgesia comes from κ agonism alone.

Report a problem with entry 116: Nalbuphine is a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist

Part 4117 / 129

Milrinone inhibits phosphodiesterase III

Milrinone is a selective phosphodiesterase III inhibitor. It raises cAMP by blocking cAMP breakdown, which increases contractility and dilates vessels without any adrenoceptor action.

Why

The type III phosphodiesterase isoenzyme is found in heart muscle and vascular smooth muscle, where it breaks cAMP down to AMP. When milrinone blocks this enzyme, cAMP builds up inside the cell. In the heart, this changes intracellular calcium handling, so the muscle contracts more strongly. In vessels, the smooth muscle relaxes. Milrinone works on the enzyme, downstream of the receptor. It does not release catecholamines or stimulate alpha or beta receptors, and it does not raise myocardial oxygen consumption.

The trap

Milrinone works through adrenergic receptors. This option tempts because milrinone is grouped with dobutamine and adrenaline as an inotrope, so people assume it works through adrenoceptors. It does not. It acts on the enzyme that breaks down cAMP, so it has no alpha or beta activity. It also dilates vessels, which rules out direct vasoconstriction.

Evidence

The textbooks call milrinone a selective PDE III inhibitor that stops cAMP being broken down. This gives both inotropy and vasodilation without acting on alpha or beta receptors. The enzyme sits in cardiac and vascular smooth muscle and converts cAMP to AMP.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
How does milrinone increase contractility?

Inhibits phosphodiesterase III, raising cAMP.

Does milrinone act on alpha or beta adrenoceptors?

No; it acts on the enzyme, downstream of receptors.

Common misconception That milrinone works through adrenoceptors

Report a problem with entry 117: Milrinone inhibits phosphodiesterase III

Part 4118 / 129

Hydralazine is a direct arteriolar vasodilator whose reflex tachycardia can provoke ischaemia; not for hypertension with ischaemic heart disease

Hydralazine is a direct-acting vasodilator. Its sympathetically driven tachycardia raises myocardial oxygen demand, so avoid it in hypertensive patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Why

Hydralazine relaxes vascular smooth muscle directly. It does not work through adrenergic receptors. As pressure falls, the baroreceptor reflex activates the sympathetic system. The heart-rate rise is often bigger than that reflex alone would produce, perhaps because the drug also acts on central cardiovascular control. A faster heart needs more oxygen. When a coronary narrowing fixes the supply, that extra demand cannot be met and acute ischaemia can follow. Its onset is also slow compared with labetalol, so it is not an agent that works within a minute.

The trap

Hydralazine safe for ischaemic heart disease. Hydralazine lowers pressure reliably and is a familiar choice for postoperative hypertension, so it can seem safe for any hypertensive patient. It fails here because its reflex tachycardia, amplified centrally, raises oxygen demand. That can push a heart with a flow-limiting coronary lesion into acute ischaemia.

Evidence

Barash says hydralazine tachycardia often exceeds baroreflex expectations, possibly via a central effect, and can raise oxygen demand enough to cause acute ischaemia beyond flow-limiting coronary lesions. Mayo classes it as a direct smooth muscle relaxant. Faust notes onset is slower than labetalol's.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo reviewFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A hypertensive man with coronary disease needs postoperative blood pressure control. Why avoid hydralazine?

Reflex tachycardia raises oxygen demand, risking ischaemia.

Common misconception That hydralazine suits any hypertensive patient

How does hydralazine lower blood pressure?

Direct arterial smooth muscle relaxation, not via adrenoceptors.

Report a problem with entry 118: Hydralazine is a direct arteriolar vasodilator whose reflex tachycardia can provoke ischaemia; not for hypertension with ischaemic heart disease

Part 4119 / 129

Sarin and nerve agents inhibit acetylcholinesterase

Sarin irreversibly inhibits acetylcholinesterase. The acetylcholine that builds up causes a cholinergic crisis at muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Sarin blocks no receptor itself.

Why

Normally, acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft breaks down acetylcholine almost at once, which ends each signal. Organophosphates such as sarin bind this enzyme permanently. Neostigmine, by contrast, binds it only reversibly. Acetylcholine therefore piles up and keeps firing every cholinergic receptor. Too much muscarinic activity gives bradycardia, hypotension, miosis, salivation, rhinorrhoea, heavy airway secretions and bronchospasm. Nicotinic receptors are overdriven as well. So 'cholinergic' correctly names the effect, and enzyme inhibition names the mechanism and the site of action.

The trap

Sarin acts directly on muscarinic receptors. Every listed sign is parasympathetic, so 'muscarinic' feels right. But sarin never acts on the receptor. It disables the enzyme, and the extra acetylcholine then overstimulates nicotinic receptors too. The muscarinic receptors are where the symptoms show up, not where the drug acts.

Evidence

The texts class sarin and other nerve agents as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors that cause cholinergic overstimulation. Acetylcholine then accumulates at both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Organophosphates block the enzyme irreversibly, whereas neostigmine blocks it reversibly.

Sources: Miller 10eStoelting 8eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After a sarin release, victims have miosis, heavy secretions and bradycardia. Mechanism?

Irreversible acetylcholinesterase inhibition.

Does sarin act directly on muscarinic receptors?

No; accumulated acetylcholine overstimulates muscarinic and nicotinic receptors.

Common misconception That sarin's site of action is the muscarinic receptor

Report a problem with entry 119: Sarin and nerve agents inhibit acetylcholinesterase

Part 4120 / 129

Relaxant classes: -curonium drugs are aminosteroids, -curium drugs benzylisoquinoliniums

Drugs ending in -curonium (vecuronium, rocuronium, pancuronium) are aminosteroids. Drugs ending in -curium, plus tubocurarine and metocurine, are benzylisoquinoliniums.

Why

The class is set by the chemical backbone, and the backbone decides how the drug behaves. Aminosteroids carry their charged nitrogen on a steroid skeleton. Sugammadex was built to wrap around that skeleton, so it reverses only aminosteroids and does nothing to benzylisoquinoliniums. Benzylisoquinoliniums are more likely to trigger mast cells directly and release histamine, especially atracurium given quickly. Aminosteroids at clinical doses mostly do not. Tubocurarine belongs with the benzylisoquinoliniums even though its name lacks the usual ending.

The trap

Tubocurarine is a steroidal neuromuscular blocker. Tubocurarine does not end in -curium, so someone relying on the suffix may place it with the steroids. It is actually a curare alkaloid in the benzylisoquinolinium class. It sits alongside mivacurium and atracurium, releases histamine readily and is not reversed by sugammadex.

Evidence

Classification tables list mivacurium, atracurium, cisatracurium, tubocurarine, metocurine and doxacurium as benzylisoquinoliniums, and vecuronium, rocuronium and pancuronium as aminosteroids. Sugammadex reverses only the steroidal group. The benzylisoquinolinium group causes direct histamine release more often.

Sources: FaustMayo reviewStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
To which chemical class does vecuronium belong, and what reverses it?

Aminosteroid; sugammadex reverses it.

Tubocurarine lacks the -curium ending. Which class is it?

Benzylisoquinolinium.

Common misconception That tubocurarine is an aminosteroid

Report a problem with entry 120: Relaxant classes: -curonium drugs are aminosteroids, -curium drugs benzylisoquinoliniums

Part 4121 / 129

Adrenergic selectivity: phenylephrine alpha-1; ephedrine mixed and mainly indirect; isoprenaline (isoproterenol) the most potent beta agonist; noradrenaline alpha over beta

Phenylephrine is essentially pure alpha-1; ephedrine acts mostly indirectly via noradrenaline release; isoprenaline (isoproterenol) is the strongest beta agonist; noradrenaline outranks adrenaline at alpha-2.

Why

Phenylephrine binds alpha-1 receptors directly and has almost no beta activity. It therefore raises arterial and venous tone without meaningful beta stimulation. Ephedrine works largely by displacing noradrenaline from nerve terminals, so its effect depends on those stores being present. On receptor grading tables, isoprenaline carries top-grade beta activity. Noradrenaline scores higher than adrenaline at both alpha-1 and alpha-2, which makes it the stronger alpha agent of the two natural catecholamines.

The trap

Adrenaline has strongest alpha-2 and beta-2 affinity. Adrenaline feels like the all-round strongest catecholamine, so people choose it for both alpha-2 affinity and beta-2 potency. On the grading table it sits below noradrenaline at alpha-2 and below isoprenaline at beta-2. Acting on many receptors does not make it the strongest at any single one.

Evidence

Grading tables give noradrenaline more alpha-1 and alpha-2 activity than adrenaline, and give isoprenaline top-grade beta activity. Phenylephrine is described as acting almost only, and directly, on alpha-1 receptors, whereas ephedrine relies on displacing stored noradrenaline.

Sources: FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which vasopressor is essentially a pure alpha-1 agonist?

Phenylephrine.

Among catecholamines, which carries the top grading for beta-2 activity?

Isoprenaline (isoproterenol).

Common misconception That adrenaline is strongest at every receptor

Report a problem with entry 121: Adrenergic selectivity: phenylephrine alpha-1; ephedrine mixed and mainly indirect; isoprenaline (isoproterenol) the most potent beta agonist; noradrenaline alpha over beta

Part 4122 / 129

Drugs that desensitise the nicotinic receptor: volatiles, ethanol, barbiturates, local anaesthetics such as lidocaine, cocaine, anticholinesterases

Nicotinic receptor desensitisers include volatiles, alcohols such as ethanol, barbiturates, local anaesthetics such as lidocaine, cocaine and anticholinesterases; fentanyl is not among them.

Why

Nicotinic receptors move back and forth between resting and desensitised shapes all the time, whether or not an agonist is present. Agonists push receptors towards the desensitised shape. Because they bind tightly to that shape, they can also hold a receptor in it. A wide range of unrelated drugs also promote this state: volatile agents, alcohols, barbiturates, local anaesthetics, cocaine and anticholinesterases. The junction may then look normal, but it responds differently to both agonists and antagonists. This can mislead interpretation of neuromuscular block.

The trap

Fentanyl desensitises nicotinic receptors at junction. Fentanyl is given with relaxants at almost every induction, so it seems relevant to the junction. It is not on the list of desensitising drugs. Ethanol (an alcohol) and lidocaine (a local anaesthetic) are both on that list, so picking only one of them misses the other.

Evidence

The textbook lists drugs that cause or promote desensitisation of muscle nicotinic receptors. They include volatile agents, polymyxin B, cocaine, alcohols including ethanol, barbiturates, agonists such as succinylcholine, anticholinesterases, local anaesthetics including lidocaine, phenothiazines, phencyclidine and verapamil.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which drug groups promote nicotinic receptor desensitisation?

Volatiles, alcohols, barbiturates, local anaesthetics, cocaine, anticholinesterases.

Odd one out as a nicotinic receptor desensitiser: isoflurane, ethanol, lidocaine, fentanyl?

The odd one out · Fentanyl.

Report a problem with entry 122: Drugs that desensitise the nicotinic receptor: volatiles, ethanol, barbiturates, local anaesthetics such as lidocaine, cocaine, anticholinesterases

Part 4123 / 129

Gabapentin acts on the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels

Gabapentin and pregabalin bind the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. Choose the calcium-channel option, never GABA, NMDA or sodium-channel actions.

Why

Gabapentin binds the alpha-2-delta subunit, an accessory part of the dorsal horn P/Q-type calcium channel. This changes how the channel works and how it is moved within the neurone. As a result, sensitised nociceptors release less glutamate and other excitatory transmitters when calcium enters. Pain signalling and central sensitisation are damped, which explains the benefit in neuropathic pain. The drug does not plug the channel pore. It modulates the channel through the accessory subunit, so an option worded as calcium-channel modulation or calcium-channel antagonism points to the same answer.

The trap

Gabapentin acts on GABA receptors. The drug's name and structure resemble GABA, so people assume it acts on a GABA receptor. In fact it binds no GABA receptor subtype and no allosteric GABA site, so it is not GABAergic. Blocking GABA receptors would also increase neuronal excitability, not relieve pain.

Evidence

The textbook says gabapentinoids bind the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. This alters channel function and trafficking and reduces release of excitatory transmitters from nociceptors. They are grouped with anticonvulsants acting on alpha-2-delta, and they bind no GABA receptor site.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is pregabalin's site of action?

The alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels.

Does gabapentin act at GABA receptors?

No; it binds no GABA receptor.

Common misconception That gabapentin is GABAergic

Report a problem with entry 123: Gabapentin acts on the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels

Part 4124 / 129

Ketamine: dissociative anaesthesia, NMDA antagonist, bronchodilator, more salivation

Ketamine blocks NMDA receptors: expect dissociative anaesthesia, bronchodilation, a faster heart, more saliva, and preserved spontaneous breathing unless other depressants are added.

Why

Ketamine blocks the NMDA receptor rather than activating it. This leaves the patient in a cataleptic trance, looking detached rather than asleep. Its anticholinergic and adrenergic actions open the airways and push heart rate and blood pressure up, so a slow heart and airway spasm are not expected. The two books agree on breathing. Barash lists only mild depression, with hypoxia that oxygen corrects. Faust says ketamine alone keeps ventilation and airway patency. Marked depression or obstruction happens only when benzodiazepines or opioids are added.

The trap

Ketamine significantly depresses spontaneous ventilation. Most induction agents depress ventilation, and one table even lists mild depression, so this seems safe. But ketamine by itself keeps the patient breathing with an open airway. Significant depression comes from added benzodiazepines or opioids, so it is not a defining feature of the drug.

Evidence

Barash lists ketamine as an NMDA antagonist that gives dissociative anaesthesia and bronchodilation and raises heart rate and blood pressure. Increased salivation is among its side effects. Both texts say spontaneous breathing is kept, and depression arises when other respiratory depressants are combined.

Sources: Barash 9eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which receptor does ketamine block to produce dissociative anaesthesia?

The NMDA receptor.

A patient receives ketamine alone, with no opioid or benzodiazepine. What happens to breathing?

Spontaneous breathing and airway patency are kept.

Common misconception That ketamine alone causes marked respiratory depression

Report a problem with entry 124: Ketamine: dissociative anaesthesia, NMDA antagonist, bronchodilator, more salivation

Part 4125 / 129

ACE inhibitors: natriuresis, lower afterload, higher renal blood flow

ACE inhibitors cut afterload and blood pressure, raise cardiac output and renal blood flow, and promote sodium excretion, which is an indirect diuretic action.

Why

Blocking conversion to angiotensin II removes a strong arterial constrictor. Afterload falls, arteries become more compliant, arterial pressure drops and the heart ejects more. More blood reaches the kidneys, so they excrete more sodium and intravascular volume falls. The drug does not act on the tubule the way a true diuretic does. The sodium loss comes from these haemodynamic and renal changes, so it is indirect. As pressure and volume normalise, the chronically raised sympathetic drive eases. The net result is lower pressure, not higher.

The trap

ACE inhibitors cause hypokalaemia from natriuresis. Natriuresis makes people think of loop and thiazide diuretics, which waste potassium, so hypokalaemia seems to follow. It does not. ACE inhibitors are not tubular diuretics. They only make sodium loss easier through haemodynamic and renal effects, so the potassium-wasting pattern of diuretics does not apply.

Evidence

Barash lists the effects of ACE inhibition as reduced left ventricular afterload, better arterial compliance, lower arterial pressure, higher cardiac output, more renal blood flow and easier natriuresis. These changes lower sympathetic tone, and the renal effects shrink intravascular volume.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
How does an ACE inhibitor change afterload, cardiac output and renal blood flow?

Lowers afterload; raises cardiac output and renal blood flow.

Does an ACE inhibitor cause hypokalaemia like a loop diuretic?

No; its sodium loss is indirect, not tubular.

Common misconception That ACE inhibitors waste potassium like true diuretics

Report a problem with entry 125: ACE inhibitors: natriuresis, lower afterload, higher renal blood flow

Part 4126 / 129

Fenoldopam is a dopamine-1 agonist alternative to nitroprusside

Fenoldopam, a selective dopamine D-one receptor arterial vasodilator, can replace sodium nitroprusside for perioperative hypertension or deliberate hypotension, preserving renal blood flow.

Why

Fenoldopam stimulates first-subtype dopamine receptors, which selectively dilates arteries and lowers blood pressure. That is the same job a nitroprusside infusion does, so the two are interchangeable. The kidney is where they differ. Nitroprusside reduces renal blood flow. Fenoldopam maintains or increases it, which causes a diuresis and sodium loss. Trials of it as a kidney protector remain equivocal. Severe hypertension needs larger doses, and these can cause an unwanted tachycardia. For that reason, fenoldopam is seldom the first choice after surgery.

The trap

Dopamine is fenoldopam's appropriate haemodynamic substitute. The names and receptors overlap, so dopamine looks like the natural counterpart. But using the same receptor does not make one drug a substitute for the other. Fenoldopam only dilates arteries to lower pressure. Its counterpart is therefore another vasodilator, not a catecholamine given to support the circulation.

Evidence

Miller describes fenoldopam as a short-acting, arterial-selective dopamine-receptor agonist of the D-one type. Unlike nitroprusside, it can produce deliberate hypotension without reducing renal blood flow. Higher doses can raise the heart rate, which limits its use as a first-line drug after surgery.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which dopamine D1 agonist can replace nitroprusside for perioperative hypertension?

Fenoldopam.

How do fenoldopam and nitroprusside differ in their renal effect?

Fenoldopam keeps or raises renal flow; nitroprusside reduces it.

Report a problem with entry 126: Fenoldopam is a dopamine-1 agonist alternative to nitroprusside

Part 4127 / 129

Nitroprusside: potent arterial and venous dilator; cyanide toxicity above 1 mg/kg within 2 hours or 0.5 mg/kg/h over 24 hours

Nitroprusside impairs platelets (prolonging bleeding time), raises intracranial pressure, and yields toxic cyanide above 1.0 mg/kg within 2 hours or 0.5 mg/kg/hr over 24 hours.

Why

Nitroprusside, like nitroglycerin, is a nitric oxide donor. These drugs reduce platelet aggregation and secretion, weakening primary haemostasis and lengthening bleeding time. Cerebral vasodilation raises intracranial pressure. Pulmonary vasodilation undoes hypoxic vasoconstriction, increasing shunt. Metabolism releases cyanide, which accumulates with large, rapid or prolonged dosing, and more readily in hepatic dysfunction, malnourishment or hypothermia. Watch for metabolic acidosis, tachyphylaxis, arrhythmias, rising mixed venous saturation and confusion.

The trap

Nitroprusside has maximum infusion rate limit. Nitroprusside does have a well-known dose ceiling, so a maximum-rate option looks familiar. But the textbooks state its safety limit as a cumulative dose over hours, set by how much cyanide builds up. They don't give it as a brief high-rate burst, and they don't support this figure.

Evidence

The books state that nitroprusside reversibly impairs platelet aggregation, that it raises intracranial pressure, and that toxic cyanide levels follow more than 1.0 mg/kg within 2 hours or more than 0.5 mg/kg/hr within 24 hours.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eStoelting 8eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Above what cumulative nitroprusside doses does cyanide toxicity arise?

1.0 mg/kg within 2 hours, or 0.5 mg/kg/hr over 24 hours.

Why is nitroprusside a poor choice with raised intracranial pressure?

Cerebral vasodilation raises intracranial pressure further.

Report a problem with entry 127: Nitroprusside: potent arterial and venous dilator; cyanide toxicity above 1 mg/kg within 2 hours or 0.5 mg/kg/h over 24 hours

Part 4128 / 129

Anticholinesterases also act on the motor nerve ending: longer terminal action potential, repetitive firing

Anticholinesterases act prejunctionally too: they lengthen the nerve-terminal action potential and refractory period, prolonging acetylcholine release, so muscle fibres fire repetitively even without relaxant.

Why

How much transmitter is released depends on how much and for how long the terminal membrane stays depolarised. An anticholinesterase reversibly lengthens the terminal action potential, so the nerve keeps releasing acetylcholine for longer after each impulse. The enzyme is also inhibited, so this extra acetylcholine is broken down more slowly. End-plate potentials therefore last longer and muscle fibres discharge repeatedly. With no blocking drug present, this repeated firing shows up as spontaneous contractions, which is evidence of a prejunctional action.

The trap

Anticholinesterases only act postsynaptically at junction. People learn anticholinesterases only as inhibitors of the enzyme in the cleft. They then assume the twitching comes from acetylcholine building up at the end-plate alone. That misses the nerve terminal. Its depolarisation and release period are prolonged, and the textbook links spontaneous contractions without relaxant to these prejunctional effects.

Evidence

Reversible lengthening of the nerve-terminal action potential and refractory period prolongs depolarisation-dependent release per impulse. With slower hydrolysis, this prolongs end-plate potentials and causes repetitive fibre firing. The textbook credits this for contractions seen without relaxant.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Neostigmine given with no relaxant present causes spontaneous muscle twitching. Why?

Prejunctional action: longer terminal action potential, repetitive firing.

Is an anticholinesterase's action limited to enzyme inhibition in the cleft?

No; it also prolongs nerve-terminal depolarisation and release.

Common misconception That cleft enzyme inhibition alone explains the twitching

Report a problem with entry 128: Anticholinesterases also act on the motor nerve ending: longer terminal action potential, repetitive firing

Part 4129 / 129

Autonomic transmitters: postganglionic sympathetic fibres release noradrenaline; the heart's parasympathetic receptor is muscarinic (M2)

Sympathetic postganglionic endings release noradrenaline, while adrenaline is an adrenal hormone; acetylcholine acts at ganglia; cardiac vagal slowing works through muscarinic M2 receptors.

Why

Both autonomic divisions use acetylcholine on nicotinic receptors at the ganglion. The sympathetic postganglionic neurone then releases noradrenaline onto target adrenoceptors. It also acts on presynaptic α2 receptors on its own terminal, which damps further release. Sweat glands and some skeletal muscle vessels are the cholinergic exceptions. The adrenal medulla is driven by the same preganglionic acetylcholine and sends adrenaline into the blood as a hormone. Vagal postganglionic fibres release acetylcholine onto cardiac M2 muscarinic receptors, which lowers rate, conduction and contractility.

The trap

Adrenaline is postganglionic sympathetic nerve transmitter. Adrenaline sounds like the sympathetic transmitter, it surges under stress, and some texts group it with noradrenaline as a sympathetic mediator. But the adrenal medulla secretes it into the blood as a circulating hormone. The sympathetic nerve endings themselves release noradrenaline.

Evidence

Acetylcholine stimulates nicotinic receptors in sympathetic ganglia and the adrenal medulla. Noradrenaline is the main postganglionic transmitter, with cholinergic exceptions for sweat glands and muscle vessels. Adrenaline is an adrenal hormone. Presynaptic α2 receptors limit release, and cardiac depression acts via M2.

Sources: FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What transmitter do sympathetic postganglionic nerve endings release?

Noradrenaline.

Common misconception That adrenaline is the sympathetic nerve transmitter

Through which receptor does vagal stimulation slow the heart?

Muscarinic M2.

Report a problem with entry 129: Autonomic transmitters: postganglionic sympathetic fibres release noradrenaline; the heart's parasympathetic receptor is muscarinic (M2)

Back to card 20Back to contents

Sheet 03 · Pharmacology129 / 129

That is every concept on the pharmacology sheet.

Back on the cards, the quiz checks what stuck.

Take the quiz