Core rules004 / 83
Absolute indications for lung isolation
Absolute when omitting it harms the patient: soiling by blood or pus, fistula, giant bulla, torn airway, lavage. Surgical access alone, even pneumonectomy, is relative.
WhyLung separation is essential for two reasons. First, contamination: blood or pus from a diseased lung can drown the healthy lung and destroy gas exchange. Lavage fluid is a deliberate contaminant and must also be confined. Second, loss of control over ventilation: a fistula, disrupted airway or giant bulla takes or leaks positive-pressure breaths, so ventilation must be directed to one side. Deflating a lung for pneumonectomy, aortic or oesophageal surgery only improves the surgeon's view. These operations can proceed without isolation, so those indications are relative.
The trapLung isolation mandatory for pneumonectomy. Pneumonectomy is the largest lung resection and the classic double-lumen tube case, so isolation feels mandatory. However, isolation there only improves surgical exposure. The healthy lung faces no soiling and no ventilation leak, so the textbooks list it as a high-priority relative indication, not an absolute one.
EvidenceBarash and Faust agree on the absolute indications: protective isolation for infection or massive haemorrhage, controlling ventilation for bronchopleural fistula, a unilateral cyst or bulla, or major airway disruption, and unilateral lavage. Pneumonectomy, thoracic aortic surgery and oesophageal surgery appear only as relative, exposure-driven indications.
Sources: Barash 9e
Clues · tap one to see the answerA 50-year-old with brisk bleeding from a left lung lesion comes for thoracic surgery. Is lung isolation absolute or relative here?
Absolute: blood could flood the healthy lung.
Odd one out among indications for lung isolation: unilateral lavage, bronchopleural fistula, giant bulla, pneumonectomy. Which is only relative?
The odd one out · Pneumonectomy: isolation there only improves surgical exposure.
Common misconception That pneumonectomy makes isolation mandatory
Report a problem with entry 4: Absolute indications for lung isolation
Core rules005 / 83
Right-sided double-lumen tube: indicated when the left main bronchus cannot be used
Default to a left-sided DLT; choose right-sided only if the left main bronchus is diseased, distorted, compressed or the surgical site.
WhyA right-sided tube has to ventilate the right upper lobe through a slot. It shifts easily during surgery, and that lobe's ventilation is then compromised, so left tubes are preferred. The bronchial limb goes into the lung that is not being operated on. A left tube is harmful or impossible when the left bronchus is the operative site, as in transplant, sleeve resection or disruption. The same applies when tumour or a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm narrows the left bronchus. In those cases a right tube is chosen.
The trapTube side matches operative side. It feels natural to match the tube's side to the side of the operation. But the bronchial limb sits in the lung that is not being operated on. A right lung transplant therefore takes a left-sided tube. It is a left lung transplant that calls for a right-sided tube.
EvidenceRight-sided tubes are used for: a distorted left bronchial entrance, tumour compression, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, surgery on the left mainstem bronchus, left lung transplant and left tracheobronchial disruption. Otherwise a left tube is preferred, unless carinal or proximal left bronchial lesions forbid it.
Sources: Miller 10eFaustBarash 9e
Clues · tap one to see the answerWhich double-lumen tube suits a left lung transplant, where the left main bronchus is the operative site?
Right-sided DLT, so the left bronchus stays free.
Right single-lung transplant: a trainee picks a right-sided tube to mirror the surgery. What should he pick instead?
A left-sided tube; the bronchial limb goes in the non-operated lung.
Common misconception That tube side should match the side of surgery
Report a problem with entry 5: Right-sided double-lumen tube: indicated when the left main bronchus cannot be used
Core rules006 / 83
Bronchial blocker compared with a double-lumen tube
A bronchial blocker trades less airway injury for slower placement, more frequent repositioning and poorer suction of the isolated lung than a double-lumen tube.
WhyA blocker has to be steered into the target bronchus with a bronchoscope, so it takes longer to seat. Barash quotes about 3 minutes for an Arndt blocker against 2 for a left double-lumen tube. A meta-analysis agrees that double-lumen tubes go in faster and more reliably. Once in place, surgical handling dislodges a blocker more easily, so it needs repositioning more often. It also allows only minimal suction of the isolated lung. What it gains is airway safety: blockers cause less airway injury.
The trapBronchial blocker faster insertion than DLT. It is tempting because a blocker slides through an ordinary single-lumen tube, and that feels quicker. It is wrong because the blocker must be guided into place with a bronchoscope. Both the textbook table and the trial timings show it takes longer than a double-lumen tube.
EvidenceMiller's comparison table lists slower positioning, more frequent repositioning and only minimal suction to the isolated lung as blocker drawbacks. A Barash trial and a meta-analysis agree that placement is slower, so expect a blocker to take longer. Airway injury is less common with blockers.
Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e
Clues · tap one to see the answerA colleague prefers a bronchial blocker to a double-lumen tube for lobectomy. What is the blocker's main advantage?
It causes less airway trauma than a double-lumen tube.
Compared with a left double-lumen tube, how does a bronchoscope-guided Arndt blocker perform for speed of placement?
Slower to place, and needs repositioning more often.
Common misconception That a blocker is quicker to place than a double-lumen tube
Report a problem with entry 6: Bronchial blocker compared with a double-lumen tube
Core rules007 / 83
Choosing double-lumen tube size by sex and height
Pick DLT size by sex and height: woman <160 cm 35 Fr, >160 cm 37 Fr; man <170 cm 39 Fr, >170 cm 41 Fr.
WhySurgeons once chose the largest tube that would pass. Faust says airway injury rises with tube size, so it now favours smaller tubes: 35 Fr suits most women and 37 Fr suits men. Miller's table builds on that default by adding height. A woman taller than 160 cm moves up to 37 Fr, and men split at 170 cm into 39 or 41 Fr. Faust's sex-only figure is the starting point. Once height is known, the table decides.
The trap35 Fr appropriate for all women. 35 Fr is tempting because one textbook calls it right for most women, and smaller tubes cause less airway trauma. That figure ignores height. Once a woman is taller than 160 cm, the height-based table moves her up to 37 Fr.
EvidenceMiller's table gives women 35 Fr under 160 cm and 37 Fr above; men 39 Fr under 170 cm and 41 Fr above. Faust links tube size to airway trauma, recommending 35 Fr for most women and 37 Fr for men.
Sources: Miller 10eFaust
Clues · tap one to see the answerA woman 168 cm tall needs a left double-lumen tube for thoracoscopic surgery. Which size suits her?
37 Fr, since she is taller than 160 cm.
Common misconception That 35 Fr suits every woman whatever her height
A man 165 cm tall needs a double-lumen tube for oesophagectomy. Which size suits him?
39 Fr, since he is under 170 cm.
Report a problem with entry 7: Choosing double-lumen tube size by sex and height