Core rules004 / 88
Leading cause of maternal death
For the leading cause of maternal death, choose obstetric haemorrhage; US data rank grouped cardiovascular disease first, but cardiomyopathy alone still ranks below haemorrhage.
WhyBarash says bleeding kills more mothers worldwide than any other cause, about 25% of deaths. Miller's US series differs: grouped cardiovascular conditions lead at 15.5%, but that heading pools many heart diseases. Counted alone, cardiomyopathy sits below haemorrhage in every US series: 11% against 11.4% in 2011 to 2013, 10.6% against 11.5% in CDC surveillance for 2005 to 2024, and 8.5% against 13.7% in state reviews for 2017 to 2019. So against cardiomyopathy, pre-eclampsia or aspiration, haemorrhage wins in both sources.
The trapCardiovascular disease as leading cause. It is tempting because recent texts stress that heart disease now causes the most pregnancy-related deaths in the US. But that figure groups many cardiac conditions together. Cardiomyopathy on its own still ranks just below haemorrhage in US data, and worldwide haemorrhage leads clearly.
EvidenceBleeding accounts for roughly 25% of maternal deaths globally, chiefly in low-resource settings. In US data for 2011 to 2013, cardiovascular conditions lead (15.5%), then haemorrhage (11.4%), cardiomyopathy (11%) and hypertensive disorders (7.4%). Haemorrhage deaths are falling; cardiovascular deaths are rising.
Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eMayo review
Clues · tap one to see the answerWorldwide, which single cause kills the most mothers, accounting for about 25% of maternal deaths?
Obstetric haemorrhage.
US data show grouped cardiovascular disease leading at 15.5%. Against cardiomyopathy alone (11% in 2011 to 2013), where does haemorrhage at 11.4% rank?
Above cardiomyopathy; the cardiovascular figure pools many heart diseases.
Common misconception That cardiac disease overtakes haemorrhage as a single cause of maternal death
Report a problem with entry 4: Leading cause of maternal death
Core rules005 / 88
Uterine atony is the commonest cause of postpartum haemorrhage
When a woman bleeds heavily after delivery and nothing else is known, blame uterine atony first. Then look for trauma, retained tissue and failed clotting.
WhyOnce the placenta separates, the open vessels in the placental bed stop bleeding mainly because the muscle of the uterus contracts around them. Anything that tires, overstretches or inflames that muscle leaves the vessels open. Examples are labour that has been augmented or has gone on a long time, multiple gestation, polyhydramnios and chorioamnionitis. These are common, so atony outnumbers every other cause. It can happen after vaginal or caesarean birth, and the bleeding may be sudden or come hours later.
The trapRetained placenta diagnosis misses atony likelihood. Retained placenta is a real and listed cause, and it also predisposes to atony, so it sounds specific and clever. But nothing in the history points to incomplete delivery of the placenta. A soft, tired uterus after a long labour is far more likely, and atony accounts for most cases.
EvidenceTextbooks and WHO guidance agree that atony is the leading cause after either vaginal or caesarean birth and accounts for over 70% of cases. Genital tract trauma, rupture, retained tissue and coagulopathy contribute less often.
Sources: FaustBarash 9eOutside our books: WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (2012)
Clues · tap one to see the answerAfter a 20-hour augmented labour, a para 3 bleeds heavily soon after birth. Nothing else is known. Most likely cause?
Uterine atony.
Heavy bleeding after a twin birth with polyhydramnios; the placenta came out complete. A student suspects retained placenta. Which cause is likelier?
Atony, which accounts for over 70% of cases.
Common misconception That retained placenta is the likeliest cause
Report a problem with entry 5: Uterine atony is the commonest cause of postpartum haemorrhage
Core rules006 / 88
Uterine bleeding: uterine massage and uterotonics first
For postpartum uterine bleeding, massage the uterus and give a uterotonic, with oxytocin as the first choice, before any airway, surgical or escalation step.
WhyPostpartum haemorrhage most commonly results from a floppy (atonic) uterus, so the first job is to make the uterus contract again. Massage can start at the bedside as soon as the bleeding is recognised and needs no equipment. Oxytocin then keeps the uterus contracted. Crystalloid fluid resuscitation starts at the same time. Tranexamic acid and further measures are only for bleeding that continues after these first steps.
The trapCross-matching delays urgent uterotonic treatment. Cross-matching is tempting because heavy bleeding makes you think of transfusion. But ordering blood does nothing to make an atonic uterus contract, so the bleeding carries on. The first step that deals with the cause is massage plus a uterotonic. Blood preparation runs alongside it and does not replace it.
EvidenceGuidance and textbooks agree that atony is the commonest cause of postpartum haemorrhage. Uterine massage should start as soon as haemorrhage is diagnosed, with oxytocin as the first drug and early crystalloid resuscitation. Tranexamic acid is kept for refractory atonic bleeding.
Sources: Outside our books: WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (2012)Miller 10eFaust
Clues · tap one to see the answerBrisk bleeding with a boggy uterus ten minutes after vaginal birth. What are the first measures?
Rub up the uterus and give oxytocin, with crystalloid alongside.
Atonic postpartum bleed: the midwife's first move is to send blood for cross-match. What should come first?
Massage plus a uterotonic; blood preparation runs alongside, not instead.
Common misconception That ordering blood treats the atonic uterus
Report a problem with entry 6: Uterine bleeding: uterine massage and uterotonics first
Core rules007 / 88
Uterotonic doses and routes: methylergometrine 0.2 mg IM, not intravenous as a routine; carboprost 0.25 mg IM every 15-60 minutes; misoprostol 600-800 mcg
If oxytocin fails, add methylergometrine 0.2 mg IM, carboprost 0.25 mg IM every 15–60 minutes, or misoprostol 600–800 mcg; never rapid-IV methylergometrine.
WhyExtra oxytocin achieves little in an unresponsive uterus, so switch mechanism. Methylergometrine, an ergot, constricts vessels, causing hypertension and coronary spasm: give 0.2 mg IM, at most 5 doses, and avoid it in pre-eclampsia. Faust calls IV use controversial; the label allows IV only slowly over at least 60 seconds with pressure watched, as a lifesaving measure. Carboprost can cause bronchospasm; Barash repeats it every 15–60 minutes, Mayo allows up to 90 and a 2 mg ceiling. Misoprostol is 600–800 mcg in Miller's; none sets an hourly repeat.
The trapRapid intravenous methylergometrine 200 mcg. Methylergometrine is a real second-line uterotonic and 200 mcg is the correct dose, so this looks right. The route fails: it is an intramuscular vasoconstrictor, and a rapid IV dose risks hypertensive crisis, stroke or coronary spasm; IV use is reserved for a slow, monitored last resort.
EvidenceBarash tabulates methylergometrine 0.2 mg IM and carboprost 0.25 mg IM every 15–60 minutes. Miller's names both as second-line agents and adds misoprostol 600–800 mcg. Mayo allows carboprost IM or intramyometrially every 15–90 minutes to 2 mg. Faust calls IV methylergometrine controversial.
Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eMayo reviewFaust
Clues · tap one to see the answerPostpartum haemorrhage continues despite oxytocin in a normotensive woman. Name the second-line uterotonics with doses and routes.
Methylergometrine 0.2 mg IM, carboprost 0.25 mg IM 15–60 minutely, misoprostol 600–800 mcg.
The uterus is atonic and a colleague draws up methylergometrine 200 mcg as a rapid intravenous bolus. What is wrong?
Route wrong: rapid IV risks hypertensive crisis, stroke, coronary spasm; give IM.
Common misconception That a correct dose makes rapid intravenous methylergometrine acceptable
Report a problem with entry 7: Uterotonic doses and routes: methylergometrine 0.2 mg IM, not intravenous as a routine; carboprost 0.25 mg IM every 15-60 minutes; misoprostol 600-800 mcg
Core rules008 / 88
Abruption or previa bleeding of 1,200-1,500 mL: the first blood product step
Obstetric bleeding this size: start red cells on the clinical picture; with abruption add early fibrinogen, send coagulation studies, prepare for massive transfusion.
WhyStoelting's general-surgical classes reserve red cells for losses far larger than this, but a parturient's bleeding is rapid, can be concealed and consumes clotting factors, so the obstetric chapters of Miller and Barash start replacement on the clinical picture instead of awaiting laboratory results. Abruption makes coagulopathy far likelier and fibrinogen drops early, so fibrinogen or cryoprecipitate begins alongside red cells; coagulation results then decide whether plasma and platelets follow, unless bleeding turns massive or continues, when plasma is given with red cells without waiting.
The trapFixed ratio package unwarranted at this volume. Abruption's coagulopathy makes a pre-set ratio package look thorough. But this loss is not yet massive, fixed ratios were borrowed from trauma and are questioned in obstetrics, and any ratio used is balanced, not red-cell heavy. Coagulation results decide when plasma and platelets follow.
EvidenceObstetric texts say to begin replacement from clinical assessment without awaiting laboratory results and to give fibrinogen or cryoprecipitate early. Prompt component therapy restores oxygenation and corrects coagulopathy. Abruption makes coagulopathy 54 times likelier, so coagulation is monitored closely and massive transfusion is prepared.
Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e
Clues · tap one to see the answerAbruption with an estimated 1,300 mL loss and falling pressure; labs are pending. First blood product step?
Start red cells now, add early fibrinogen, send coagulation studies.
For a 1,400 mL abruption bleed, a colleague orders a fixed red-cell-heavy pack of cells, platelets and plasma. Better approach?
Red cells with early fibrinogen; coagulation results decide plasma and platelets.
Common misconception That a preset red-cell-heavy ratio package is needed
Report a problem with entry 8: Abruption or previa bleeding of 1,200-1,500 mL: the first blood product step
Core rules009 / 88
Massive obstetric haemorrhage: transfuse red cells and plasma at a high ratio (1:1)
Massive obstetric haemorrhage: start red cells and plasma early, roughly 1:1, on clinical grounds with early fibrinogen; then tailor products to coagulation results.
WhyObstetric bleeding shares trauma's hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy, so Barash carries trauma's mortality-lowering 1:1 red cell to plasma ratio into obstetrics. Red cells alone dilute clotting factors, and fibrinogen falls early, so plasma and fibrinogen must keep pace. Miller's trauma chapter also keeps fixed ratios, but its newer obstetric chapter questions ratios borrowed from non-obstetric settings and prefers clinical and laboratory guidance. Safe under both: in massive bleeding give plasma with red cells early without awaiting results, then move to goal-directed replacement.
The trapTwo-to-one ratio under-corrects clotting factor deficit. A ratio of two to one looks like a sensible compromise that saves plasma and echoes older massive-transfusion habits. It fails because it gives too little plasma to offset dilution and consumption of clotting factors; the cited mortality benefit belongs to matched 1:1 replacement.
EvidenceBarash says obstetric transfusion practice is adapted from trauma, where 1:1 red cells to plasma reduces haemorrhage deaths. Miller's obstetric text says early products follow the clinical picture rather than pending labs, with early fibrinogen; empiric ratios apply only until coagulation-guided therapy is possible.
Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e
Clues · tap one to see the answerMassive bleeding at caesarean, 3 L and rising. What red cell to plasma ratio do you start with?
About 1:1 with early fibrinogen, then coagulation-guided.
To save plasma, a colleague suggests two units of red cells per unit of plasma in massive obstetric bleeding. The problem?
Too little plasma against factor dilution and consumption; aim near 1:1.
Common misconception That 2:1 red cells to plasma is adequate
Report a problem with entry 9: Massive obstetric haemorrhage: transfuse red cells and plasma at a high ratio (1:1)
Core rules010 / 88
Ongoing bleeding at obstetric hysterectomy after 7-6-6 transfusion: the next product
If an obstetric patient keeps bleeding after balanced transfusion, give cryoprecipitate with red cells. If cryoprecipitate is unavailable, give red cells, not factor VIIa.
WhyFibrinogen tends to run low early in obstetric bleeding, so it should be replaced early. The two books set different triggers. Miller's general bleeding guidance replaces fibrinogen at or below 1.5 g/L. Barash's obstetric table replaces it below 150–200 mg/dL at delivery. For a bleed at delivery the obstetric trigger applies, so a level just above the general cut-off still calls for cryoprecipitate. Red cells always run alongside to replace lost blood and keep tissues oxygenated. Using factor VIIa here is off-label, and adverse events have been reported.
The trapFactor VIIa wrong rescue for fibrinogen loss. Factor VIIa is tempting as a rescue drug when INR and aPTT stay prolonged despite plasma. But the deficit here is fibrinogen, which cryoprecipitate replaces directly. Its off-label use in massive haemorrhage has led to adverse-event reports, so it is not universally recommended.
EvidenceBarash lists obstetric haemorrhage at delivery with fibrinogen below 150–200 mg/dL as an indication for replacement; Miller's general threshold is ≤1.5 g/L. Miller advises early cryoprecipitate or concentrate in obstetric resuscitation, cautioning against factor VIIa. Barash stresses prompt component transfusion for blood loss and oxygenation.
Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e
Clues · tap one to see the answerStill bleeding at obstetric hysterectomy after balanced transfusion; fibrinogen 160 mg/dL. Next product?
Cryoprecipitate, given with red cells.
Obstetric bleeding continues and INR stays prolonged despite plasma. A colleague reaches for recombinant factor VIIa. Your advice?
Not recommended: off-label with adverse events; cryoprecipitate and red cells instead.
Common misconception That factor VIIa is the rescue product
Report a problem with entry 10: Ongoing bleeding at obstetric hysterectomy after 7-6-6 transfusion: the next product
Core rules011 / 88
Bleeding and hypotension hours after a caesarean for previa: back to theatre, red cells on the clinical picture, plasma once clotting fails
Haemoglobin 10, no coagulopathy: resuscitate en route to theatre, red cells when ready, no plasma order. Haemoglobin 6, INR 1.7: red cells and plasma.
WhyOnly surgery stops this bleeding, so ICU first, observation or a fixed red-cell-and-plasma order without surgery cannot replace theatre; early operation spares products and limits dilutional coagulopathy. A haemoglobin of 10 lags behind acute loss, so it never excuses blood: resuscitate on the way, warmed crystalloid bridging until red cells arrive. Plasma belongs once clotting fails: obstetric bleeding consumes and dilutes factors, and when haemoglobin has fallen and INR is prolonged after litres of fluid, more crystalloid thins clotting further, so red cells and plasma go in, with early fibrinogen.
The trapTheatre first, withholding blood while giving crystalloid. Tempting because theatre stops the bleeding; it is right when the rivals are ICU first, observation, or plasma without surgery or coagulopathy. But theatre never excuses withholding blood: once haemoglobin has fallen with INR prolonged, more clear fluid deepens the coagulopathy, so red cells and plasma go in.
EvidenceObstetric bleeding quickly causes consumptive and dilutional coagulopathy. Prompt component transfusion replaces loss, keeps tissues oxygenated and corrects clotting, guided by the clinical situation rather than awaited labs, with fibrinogen considered early. Operating as soon as possible cuts product needs and dilutional coagulopathy.
Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e
Clues · tap one to see the answerHours after a caesarean for previa, a woman is tachycardic and hypotensive. Haemoglobin is 10, INR normal. What is the plan?
Resuscitate en route to theatre, red cells when ready, no plasma order.
After litres of crystalloid for post-caesarean bleeding, haemoglobin is 6 and INR 1.7. Is more clear fluid before theatre enough?
No. Give red cells and plasma with early fibrinogen, and operate promptly.
Common misconception That theatre excuses withholding blood and more crystalloid is enough
Report a problem with entry 11: Bleeding and hypotension hours after a caesarean for previa: back to theatre, red cells on the clinical picture, plasma once clotting fails