We do the sorting. You do the medicine.

Perioperative Medicine, the reference

Sheet 06 · 87 explained concepts · in the order of the cards

Each entry says why the rule holds, the tempting wrong answer and why it is wrong, and what the books say. Then the clues that point to it: tap one to see the answer.

Study notes in our own words, checked against the named textbooks and guidelines. Not for patient care. Not affiliated with any examining body.

Core rulesAll entries001 / 87, open the list of all entries

Core rulesLeaving recovery

  1. 001Modified Aldrete score: the components and scoring a patient in recovery
  2. 002Fast-tracking: bypassing the first-stage recovery unit
  3. 003Discharge home after ambulatory surgery: what is and is not required
  4. 004Obstructive sleep apnoea after general anaesthesia: criteria to leave recovery
  5. 005Commonest cause of delayed discharge after ambulatory surgery
  6. 006Commonest persisting complaint after discharge from ambulatory surgery
Core rules001 / 87

Modified Aldrete score: the components and scoring a patient in recovery

Grade five items 2, 1 or 0; with unquantified hypotension, total hinges on circulation: 1 if pressure 20%–49% off baseline, 0 if 50% or more.

Why

Each item loses points only for its own problem. Awake, moving every limb and above 92% on air keeps 2 each; dyspnoea drops respiration to 1, so the total is one short of 10 before circulation is counted. Miller bands circulation by percentage of the pre-anaesthetic pressure; Barash prints the same bands in mmHg. A stated fall gives one grade; unstated hypotension leaves two possible totals. Pain and nausea are never scored. Miller requires 9 or more for phase 1 discharge; its sleep-apnoea checklist accepts less only with extra tests.

The trap

Any hypotension earns middle circulation point. Any hypotension is a partial deficit earning the middle circulation point, giving a higher total, only when the fall is in the middle band. A fall of half the baseline or more, such as four-fifths, scores zero; with dyspnoea the total is one below the higher total.

Evidence

Miller's modified Aldrete table grades activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness and oxygenation at 2, 1 or 0. It bands circulation by percentage of the pre-anaesthetic pressure. The maximum is 10, and 9 or more permits phase 1 discharge. Nothing else is scored.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
In recovery a man is fully awake, moves all limbs, saturates 95% on air, breathes deeply, but his pressure is 40% below baseline. Aldrete total?

9: circulation scores 1 for a 20% to 49% fall

A breathless woman in recovery, otherwise awake and moving, has a systolic pressure 55% under her pre-anaesthetic value. How does circulation score?

Zero: a fall of 50% or more earns no circulation points

Common misconception Any hypotension earns the middle circulation point

Report a problem with entry 1: Modified Aldrete score: the components and scoring a patient in recovery

Core rules002 / 87

Fast-tracking: bypassing the first-stage recovery unit

Bypass first-stage recovery only if discharge criteria are already met on leaving theatre, with oral-controlled pain and no parenteral drugs; no single criterion suffices.

Why

Short-acting agents, regional blocks and sedation techniques mean many patients are fit for step-down care when they leave theatre; admitting them to the recovery unit only delays them with repeat observations. The modified Aldrete score checks activity, breathing, circulation, consciousness and oxygenation but ignores pain and nausea, which the first-stage unit usually manages. White and Song therefore added pain and nausea-vomiting categories. A patient still needing intravenous analgesia or antiemetics scores lower and belongs in the first-stage unit. Eligibility depends on the whole score, not one sign.

The trap

Train-of-four threshold indicates fast-track recovery readiness. A train-of-four threshold looks like a firm recovery gate. In fact it is a residual-block check made in theatre before extubation, and it is not an item on the Aldrete or fast-track scores. Movement is scored clinically, and no single sign, including oxygen saturation, permits bypass on its own.

Evidence

Patients already meeting discharge criteria on reaching recovery may bypass to the second stage. The modified Aldrete score omits pain and PONV, so White and Song added both, crediting pain controlled with oral analgesics and penalising nausea needing parenteral treatment.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which patients may skip the first-stage recovery unit and go straight to step-down care?

Those already meeting discharge criteria on leaving theatre, pain controlled orally

After a short hernia repair the patient has a perfect train-of-four ratio but still needs IV antiemetics. Fast-track to step-down care?

No: needing parenteral antiemetics keeps them in first-stage recovery

Common misconception A train-of-four threshold is a recovery bypass criterion

Report a problem with entry 2: Fast-tracking: bypassing the first-stage recovery unit

Core rules003 / 87

Discharge home after ambulatory surgery: what is and is not required

Phase 1 recovery discharge is criteria-based, not time-based; modified Aldrete score ≥9 meets all sources, and sleep-apnoea patients also need a room-air challenge.

Why

The modified Aldrete score is out of 10. Miller's recovery table deems a patient fit to leave phase 1 at ≥9. Miller's sleep-apnoea box sets a lower bar of ≥8, but only alongside vital signs close to baseline, treated nausea, controlled pain and a passed room-air challenge. The thresholds therefore don't conflict: a score of ≥9 satisfies both, and the apnoea patient also needs the oxygenation test. No fixed minimum stay applies. Going home needs a responsible adult escort and a plan for pain.

The trap

Patient must be pain-free before discharge. People often assume a day-case patient must be pain-free before leaving, so this looks like the false statement. It is true. The criteria ask for pain controlled with oral analgesia, not abolished. Barash expects patients to cope with pain at home if they have adequate analgesia.

Evidence

Miller's: modified Aldrete score ≥9/10 means fit to leave phase 1; the sleep-apnoea pathway accepts ≥8 plus a room-air challenge. No minimum stay is mandated; an adult escort is required. Barash accepts discharge with pain if analgesia is adequate.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Is a minimum time in phase 1 recovery required before discharge?

No; discharge is criteria-based, modified Aldrete 9 or more

A day-case knee arthroscopy patient has moderate pain settled on oral tablets and an adult to escort him. May he go home?

Yes; pain controlled with oral analgesia, not abolished, is acceptable

Common misconception A day-case patient must be pain-free to leave

Report a problem with entry 3: Discharge home after ambulatory surgery: what is and is not required

Core rules004 / 87

Obstructive sleep apnoea after general anaesthesia: criteria to leave recovery

In OSA after general anaesthesia, meeting Aldrete criteria is not enough: observe 60 more minutes, discharging only once baseline room-air saturation holds without respiratory events.

Why

Patients with OSA have an upper airway that collapses easily. Sedatives, opioids and volatile agents add respiratory depression on top of that, so the danger lasts beyond emergence. A recovery score reached at one moment cannot show obstruction that comes back once stimulation fades, so an added observation period is needed. The guideline treats risk as ongoing until the patient keeps their own baseline saturation while breathing room air. It also advises recovering them lateral, semi-upright or in another nonsupine position.

The trap

Full Aldrete score permits immediate OSA discharge. Aldrete is the familiar discharge tool, so leaving on a score feels correct. But a low score is not a passing score. In OSA, even a full pass only starts the clock: patients need an extra hour's observation and baseline saturation on room air before leaving.

Evidence

An anaesthesia textbook suggests keeping OSA patients in recovery for an extra 60 minutes after modified Aldrete criteria are met. The ASA sleep apnoea guideline regards them as at risk until they keep baseline room-air saturation, and favours nonsupine extubation and recovery.

Sources: FaustOutside our books: Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Updated Report (2014)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man with OSA reaches full Aldrete criteria 40 minutes after a general anaesthetic. What next before discharge from recovery?

Observe a further 60 minutes

Common misconception Reaching the Aldrete score alone is enough in OSA

After that extra observation, what must the OSA patient show before leaving recovery?

Baseline room-air saturation held without respiratory events

Report a problem with entry 4: Obstructive sleep apnoea after general anaesthesia: criteria to leave recovery

Core rules005 / 87

Commonest cause of delayed discharge after ambulatory surgery

Nausea and vomiting (Barash) and pain (Miller) are the leading causes of delayed discharge after day surgery; drowsiness is not.

Why

To go home, a day-case patient must be comfortable, keep down oral fluids and be able to walk. Nausea and pain each block these criteria. They lead to rescue treatment, a longer recovery stay or an unplanned overnight admission. Barash names nausea, with or without vomiting, as the leading factor. Miller's names postoperative pain first. Both books agree these two preventable problems are the main causes. Faster awakening does not shorten the time until a patient is fit for discharge. So prevention should target nausea and pain together.

The trap

Residual sedation delays most discharges commonly. Leftover sedation seems like the obvious thing keeping a patient from going home. But neither textbook ranks it as a leading cause of delay. Agents that wake patients faster do not bring forward fitness for discharge. Nausea and pain are the causes the books name.

Evidence

Barash calls nausea with or without vomiting probably the most important contributor to delayed discharge and unplanned admission; Miller's calls pain the most significant cause. A consensus guideline adds that PONV prolongs recovery-unit stay by about 1 hour and raises nursing workload and cost.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eOutside our books: Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (2020)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What are the leading causes of delayed discharge after day surgery?

Nausea and vomiting, and pain

A day unit wants faster discharges and plans to switch to quicker-waking agents. Which problems should it target instead?

Nausea and pain together; faster waking does not speed discharge fitness

Common misconception Residual drowsiness is the main cause of delay

Report a problem with entry 5: Commonest cause of delayed discharge after ambulatory surgery

Core rules006 / 87

Commonest persisting complaint after discharge from ambulatory surgery

Drowsiness is the commonest symptom persisting after ambulatory discharge; sore throat and aches mainly affect intubated patients; nausea and vomiting are less frequent.

Why

Patients are discharged once they meet safety criteria such as stable vital signs and walking. That is not the same as full recovery from the sedative and anaesthetic drugs. Leftover central nervous system depression therefore carries on at home and is felt as sleepiness by most patients. Sore throat and muscle aches mostly come from airway instrumentation and relaxants, so they affect only intubated patients. Modern antiemetic practice means nausea and vomiting continuing at home are less common than either.

The trap

Pain and nausea are main discharge complaints. Pain and nausea and vomiting are the problems taught most often as the main barriers in day surgery, so they seem the obvious answer. The source lists drowsiness well ahead of them. Aches and sore throat are common only in intubated patients, and nausea and vomiting are much less frequent.

Evidence

Minor adverse effects are frequent after day-case anaesthesia. Drowsiness tops the list at 62%. In intubated patients sore throat affects 49% and aches 47%. Headache affects 25% and dizziness 20%, while nausea (17%) and vomiting (7%) are less common after discharge.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is the commonest symptom persisting at home after day-case anaesthesia?

Drowsiness

Common misconception Pain or nausea is the commonest persisting complaint

A day-case patient had a laryngeal mask, no tube. Why is she less likely to report a sore throat and aches at home?

Those mainly affect intubated patients

Report a problem with entry 6: Commonest persisting complaint after discharge from ambulatory surgery

Back to card 1Back to contents

Core rulesWhat the pneumoperitoneum and the tilt do

  1. 007Pneumoperitoneum: respiratory effects
  2. 008Pneumoperitoneum: haemodynamic effects
  3. 009Reverse Trendelenburg under anaesthesia: the haemodynamic response
  4. 010Head-down tilt in a euvolaemic patient: the haemodynamic effects
Core rules007 / 87

Pneumoperitoneum: respiratory effects

CO2 pneumoperitoneum stiffens and shrinks the lungs: compliance, FRC and vital capacity fall, while V/Q mismatch and peak airway pressure rise.

Why

Pressurised gas pushes the abdominal contents and diaphragm towards the head and compresses the lung bases. Dependent alveoli collapse, so FRC and vital capacity fall and the respiratory system gets stiffer. Airway pressures climb, and alveoli that are perfused but poorly ventilated increase V/Q mismatch. This happens in every patient and is worst in obesity. Absorbed CO2 separately adds a carbon dioxide load, causing hypercapnia within 15 to 30 minutes. Raising minute ventilation usually corrects it.

The trap

Hypercapnia invariably develops during pneumoperitoneum. A big rise in PaCO2 sounds right because insufflated CO2 is absorbed. The sources give no fixed percentage, though, and extra ventilation usually prevents the hypercapnia. The change that ventilator settings cannot avoid is worse V/Q mismatch.

Evidence

The texts list higher V/Q mismatch and airway pressure with lower FRC, vital capacity and compliance. Obesity adds atelectasis and mismatch. CO2 absorption brings hypercapnia within 15 to 30 minutes, and more ventilation reverses it in most patients.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
CO2 is insufflated for a laparoscopic colectomy. What happens to FRC, compliance and V/Q mismatch?

FRC and compliance fall; V/Q mismatch rises

During pneumoperitoneum, which respiratory change does raising minute ventilation fail to prevent?

Worsened V/Q mismatch; hypercapnia usually corrects with more ventilation

Common misconception PaCO2 rises by a fixed large percentage regardless of ventilation

Report a problem with entry 7: Pneumoperitoneum: respiratory effects

Core rules008 / 87

Pneumoperitoneum: haemodynamic effects

Insufflation raises SVR, MAP and arterial CO2. Cardiac output and renal, portal and splanchnic flow fall. Compliance drops while peak airway pressure and ICP rise.

Why

Raised intra-abdominal pressure compresses the aorta, so afterload rises. Stimulating the peritoneal autonomic nerves also causes a sympathetic surge: catecholamines, renin–angiotensin activation and vasopressin all add vasoconstriction. Arterial pressure therefore rises because resistance has risen, not because flow has, and cardiac output falls as the gas goes in. Visceral perfusion falls as well. The insufflated carbon dioxide raises arterial CO2 and causes a respiratory acidosis. The respiratory system becomes stiffer, so compliance falls and peak airway pressure rises.

The trap

Elevated pressure reflects increased cardiac output. It is tempting because mean arterial pressure and SVR both rise during insufflation, and people read the higher pressure as higher flow. The rise actually comes from aortic compression and neurohumoral vasoconstriction loading the ventricle. Cardiac output is observed to fall.

Evidence

One text explains the rise in SVR and MAP as aortic compression increasing afterload, and records a fall in cardiac output on insufflation. Another lists hypercarbia with acidosis, lower compliance with higher peak airway pressure, and reduced renal, portal and splanchnic flow.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
As the abdomen is inflated for a laparoscopic nephrectomy, MAP rises 15 mmHg. What has happened to cardiac output?

It has fallen; the pressure rise reflects higher SVR

Common misconception Higher arterial pressure means higher flow

Name two mechanisms by which insufflation raises systemic vascular resistance.

Aortic compression and neurohumoral vasoconstriction

Report a problem with entry 8: Pneumoperitoneum: haemodynamic effects

Core rules009 / 87

Reverse Trendelenburg under anaesthesia: the haemodynamic response

Head-up tilt under anaesthesia lowers preload and stroke volume and raises SVR. Expect the heart rate to rise, which keeps cardiac index roughly steady.

Why

Tilting head-up lets blood pool in the legs, so venous return, filling pressures and stroke volume drop. Baroreceptors sense the fall and drive sympathetic output: arterioles constrict, raising SVR, and the heart speeds up. Under anaesthesia this tachycardia offset the smaller stroke volume, so cardiac index held steady; a sleeve gastrectomy series found heart rate also climbed with pneumoperitoneum, supine or tilted. As a complication, an abrupt preload loss can instead provoke severe hypotension with reflex bradycardia, managed by flattening the table and desufflating.

The trap

Head-up positioning increases preload via gravity. Preload is the variable tilting most obviously changes, so people get its direction wrong or carry over the head-down rule. Head-up does the opposite: blood falls away from the heart and filling pressures drop. The reflex tachycardia, not extra preload, is what preserves output.

Evidence

A monitored laparoscopic study found head-up tilt lowered cardiac and stroke index and filling pressures while raising SVR; under anaesthesia a compensatory heart rate rise kept cardiac index stable. Faust warns abrupt preload loss may cause profound hypotension and reflex bradycardia.

Sources: Outside our books: The adverse hemodynamic effects of anesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2000)FaustOutside our books: The Impact of Intraoperative Position Changes on Hemodynamics and Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance Index in Patients with Severe Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (2026)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient is tilted steeply head-up for a sleeve gastrectomy. What happens to preload and SVR?

Preload and stroke volume fall; SVR rises

Under anaesthesia in head-up tilt, what keeps cardiac index roughly steady?

A reflex rise in heart rate

Common misconception Head-up tilt increases preload

Report a problem with entry 9: Reverse Trendelenburg under anaesthesia: the haemodynamic response

Core rules010 / 87

Head-down tilt in a euvolaemic patient: the haemodynamic effects

Euvolaemic head-down tilt: blood shifts centrally, head arterial pressure rises, reflex vasodilation lowers leg vascular resistance; output rise is brief; steep sustained tilt lowers it.

Why

Head-down tilt moves leg blood towards the chest and head. Miller finds this autotransfusion raises output about 9% within a minute, but the rise fades and output drifts back towards baseline within about 10 minutes. In a normally filled patient the lasting response, Barash notes, is reflex vasodilation, lowering peripheral resistance; cerebral arterial pressure rises while leg perfusion pressure falls. For steep, sustained tilt, Miller's robotic chapter lists lower output and organ perfusion and higher myocardial oxygen use. So leg resistance falls; the output rise is transient.

The trap

Sustained rise in cardiac output. Tempting because head-down tilt plainly improves venous return from the legs, so it looks like a fluid challenge. In a normally filled patient, though, the central shift triggers reflex vasodilation, the early output rise fades within minutes, and steep sustained tilt can lower output and organ perfusion.

Evidence

Miller lists, for steep head-down tilt in a normovolaemic patient, lower leg perfusion pressure, higher cerebral arterial pressure, more central blood volume, reduced output and organ perfusion, and greater myocardial oxygen use. Barash notes better venous return but also reflex vasodilation.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A euvolaemic 55-year-old is placed in steep head-down tilt for pelvic surgery. What happens to leg vascular resistance, and what to the early output rise?

Leg resistance falls through reflex vasodilation; the output rise is brief and fades.

A colleague says head-down tilt acts like a fluid challenge in a normally filled patient, so output stays raised. After 10 minutes, what is expected?

Output drifts back towards baseline; steep sustained tilt may lower output and organ perfusion.

Common misconception That head-down tilt is a lasting fluid challenge that keeps output up

Report a problem with entry 10: Head-down tilt in a euvolaemic patient: the haemodynamic effects

Back to card 2Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsProceed, postpone or investigate

  1. 011ASA physical status classification
  2. 012Day-of-surgery hypertension in an anxious patient after a missed ACE inhibitor dose
  3. 013Preoperative blood pressure below 180/110 mmHg does not by itself justify cancelling elective surgery
  4. 014Kyphoscoliosis with good function and normal lung tests: when ECG and echocardiogram are the next test
  5. 015Scoliosis correction: preoperative investigations
  6. 016How long a preoperative history and examination stays valid
  7. 017Preventing perioperative stroke in a patient with a previous stroke
Part 1011 / 87

ASA physical status classification

Grade the patient's systemic disease, not the operation: 1 healthy, 2 mild, 3 severe, 4 life-threatening, 5 moribund, 6 brain-dead donor; add E for emergency.

Why

The scale grades fitness for surgery by severity of coexisting illness, not the risk of the proposed operation, which must be judged separately. Classes rise with severity. Class 4 is severe disease constantly threatening life. Class 5 is a moribund patient not expected to survive without the operation. Class 6 is not a risk grade for a living patient; it is a brain-dead person whose organs are being retrieved for donation. Suffix E denotes an emergency and does not change the class number.

The trap

ASA 4 and 5 criteria are identical. Both ASA 4 and ASA 5 describe critically ill patients, so the wording is easy to mix up. A constant threat to life defines class 4. Class 5 is reserved for the moribund patient, whose survival depends on having the operation at all.

Evidence

The ASA table lists six categories. They run from normal health through mild, severe and life-threatening systemic disease to the moribund patient and the brain-dead organ donor. An added E means emergency surgery. The original scheme had five classes and did not weigh procedural risk.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A patient has severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. ASA class?

ASA 4

Common misconception Constant threat to life defines ASA 5

A moribund patient not expected to survive without the operation, having it as an emergency. ASA grade?

ASA 5E

Report a problem with entry 11: ASA physical status classification

Part 1012 / 87

Day-of-surgery hypertension in an anxious patient after a missed ACE inhibitor dose

Treat day-of-surgery hypertension as possibly situational: address anxiety, recheck properly, then proceed if below 180/110; at or above, weigh delay individually.

Why

In an anxious patient, a raised reading may be a white-coat surge rather than poor long-term control, particularly if an ACE inhibitor was skipped, as many patients are advised. Check technique and repeat the reading. Barash cites older literature delaying elective surgery when diastolic exceeded 110, but the cited study found no major morbidity in that group. Miller and Stoelting find no outcome link below 180/110 and no proof that delay helps. The threshold therefore stands, but delay above it is a judgement, not automatic.

The trap

Single raised reading warrants operative cancellation. Cancelling feels safe because high pressure is linked to cardiac events and older teaching delayed surgery above a diastolic cut-off. But one anxious reading does not confirm hypertension, and delay has no proven benefit. Postponement is only weighed for marked, confirmed hypertension or for end-organ injury that treatment could improve.

Evidence

Stoelting notes day-of-surgery readings may be white-coat and that ACE inhibitors are often deliberately interrupted; confirm technique and recheck. Miller finds no risk link below 180/110 and no benefit from delay. Barash's own data undercut automatic delay above 110 diastolic. No book names an anxiolytic.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An anxious woman who skipped her ACE inhibitor reads 172/104 on arrival for a hernia repair. First step?

Address anxiety, check technique and repeat the reading

On repeat she is 168/100. Proceed or postpone?

Proceed: below 180/110 there is no gain from delay

Common misconception One raised reading mandates cancellation

Report a problem with entry 12: Day-of-surgery hypertension in an anxious patient after a missed ACE inhibitor dose

Part 1013 / 87

Preoperative blood pressure below 180/110 mmHg does not by itself justify cancelling elective surgery

Proceed with elective surgery when systolic pressure is under 180 and diastolic under 110 mmHg. Only above that, weigh optimisation against the cost of delay.

Why

Hypertension raises perioperative cardiovascular risk overall. That excess risk is not seen below 180 systolic or 110 diastolic, and no evidence shows that postponing surgery to tighten control lowers risk. The UK figure of 160/100 is not a competing cut-off. It covers documented community readings, which let a patient be accepted without further work-up. The 180/110 line marks where risk becomes evident. Above it, delaying surgery is a judgement: the gain from better control is set against the harm of waiting. Below it, you proceed.

The trap

Pressure below severe threshold needs escalated care. It feels like a safe middle course because hypertensive patients are known to be haemodynamically labile. Below the severe threshold, though, raised pressure carries no clear added cardiovascular risk. Nothing supports escalating postoperative care for that reason alone, so the books' answer is simply to proceed.

Evidence

Below 180 systolic and 110 diastolic, hypertension shows no clear link with cardiac complications, and deferral has not been shown to lower risk. UK practice accepts community readings under 160/100. Above the severe threshold, the benefit of optimisation is weighed against the harm of delay.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Below what blood pressure should elective surgery simply proceed?

Systolic under 180 and diastolic under 110 mmHg

A man at 176/106 is listed for elective hip replacement. Does he need a monitored postoperative bed for his pressure?

No; proceed with routine care

Common misconception Moderate hypertension needs escalated postoperative care

Report a problem with entry 13: Preoperative blood pressure below 180/110 mmHg does not by itself justify cancelling elective surgery

Part 1014 / 87

Kyphoscoliosis with good function and normal lung tests: when ECG and echocardiogram are the next test

Scoliosis correction: spirometry first; if normal, ECG plus echocardiogram (Barash), not chest CT or DLCO; Miller wants a diagnostic question first.

Why

A thoracic curve restricts the lungs, and long-standing hypoxaemia can rarely drive pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale, which spirometry cannot reveal. Barash's spine-surgery chapter asks for ECG and echo before correction to define ventricular function and pulmonary pressures. Miller's general guidance discourages echo without a diagnostic question, and routine cardiology referral on curve size alone is low-yield. So for scoliosis surgery echo is the best test to pick, sharpened by symptoms, a murmur, a large curve, low vital capacity or an ECG change; stable patients having other surgery skip it.

The trap

Chest CT for the deformed thorax. A deformed thorax invites chest imaging, and CT looks thorough. But spirometry is already normal, so lung anatomy adds little, and CT tells nothing about pulmonary pressures or ventricular function, the hidden cardiac risk the spine chapter wants an echocardiogram to exclude. DLCO likewise adds nothing once spirometry is normal.

Evidence

Barash advises ECG and echocardiography to assess ventricular function and pulmonary pressures, since scoliosis can rarely cause cor pulmonale. Miller finds echo useful for pulmonary hypertension yet discourages routine echo without a diagnostic question. A scoliosis cohort found Cobb-angle-based referral rarely changed findings or timing.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eOutside our books: Low utility of pre-operative cardiology referrals in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a cutoff of Cobb > 70 degrees (2026)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 14-year-old with a large thoracic curve awaits correction. She is active and spirometry is normal. Which test comes next: chest CT, DLCO, or ECG with echocardiogram?

ECG plus echocardiogram, to assess ventricular function and pulmonary pressures.

Scoliosis patient, normal spirometry, no symptoms. A colleague requests chest CT to look for hidden risk. Why does this not answer the concern?

CT shows lung anatomy, not pulmonary pressures or ventricular function; spirometry already normal.

Common misconception That a deformed thorax needs chest imaging before surgery

Report a problem with entry 14: Kyphoscoliosis with good function and normal lung tests: when ECG and echocardiogram are the next test

Part 1015 / 87

Scoliosis correction: preoperative investigations

For scoliosis correction, do pulmonary function tests first in every patient. Echocardiography comes next, to look for pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular strain.

Why

A spinal curve stiffens the chest wall, causing a restrictive lung defect. A small vital capacity means a weak cough and little reserve after long prone surgery. Barash links a vital capacity below 30–35% of predicted with prolonged postoperative ventilation, so spirometry decides the extent of surgery and the need for ventilation. Chronic hypoxia from restriction raises pulmonary vascular resistance, so echo measures right heart strain. Miller advises selective testing, covering routine screening for other surgery; in scoliosis correction, the deformity is the reason to test.

The trap

Echocardiography should precede pulmonary function testing. Echo is tempting because scoliosis can strain the right heart, and texts do advise it before correction. But the restrictive lung defect affects every patient, and it decides how far the surgery goes and whether ventilation is needed afterwards. Echo follows lung testing. It does not replace it.

Evidence

Miller says formal lung function testing guides how extensive the surgery can be and whether ventilation is needed afterwards, and that transthoracic echo helps grade pulmonary hypertension. Barash links a vital capacity below 30% to 35% of predicted with prolonged ventilation.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Spinal fusion is planned for a girl aged 13 with a 70-degree curve. Which assessment do you obtain ahead of all others?

Her lung function, by spirometry

Common misconception Echocardiography comes before lung testing

Spirometry shows vital capacity 28% of predicted before spinal fusion. What does this predict?

Prolonged postoperative ventilation

Report a problem with entry 15: Scoliosis correction: preoperative investigations

Part 1016 / 87

How long a preoperative history and examination stays valid

Preoperative history and examination stays valid 30 days; repeat older ones in full; document changes within 24 hours of admission or registration, before surgery.

Why

A patient's health can change between clinic and theatre: new illness, changed medication or a worsening chronic condition can make an old assessment misleading. The Joint Commission and CMS standard therefore works in two layers. The full documented history and examination must be no more than 30 days old; anything older is repeated in full, not replaced by a brief look on the day. A later update, documented within 24 hours of admission or registration and before surgery, records any change; Miller quotes it as a 48-hour window.

The trap

Full evaluation valid for only one day. People remember that the patient is seen again just before surgery, so a day seems right. That late contact is only the update, which the Joint Commission and CMS place within 24 hours of admission or registration and before surgery. The full evaluation's limit is 30 days.

Evidence

Miller: the Joint Commission requires documented history and examination no more than 30 days before surgery, plus reassessment in the 48 hours beforehand. Barash gives the same 30-day limit. CMS wants the update within 24 hours of admission, before surgery.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9eOutside our books: 42 CFR 482.22(c)(5) and 482.51(b)(1): hospital Conditions of Participation, history and physical (2026)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A full history and examination was documented 41 days before a planned laparotomy. Can it be used with only a brief update on the day?

No; it is older than 30 days, so repeat it in full.

Common misconception That a brief day-of-surgery look can replace an out-of-date full assessment

A full assessment was done 12 days ago. What must be documented, and when, before surgery?

An update of any change within 24 hours of admission or registration, before surgery.

Report a problem with entry 16: How long a preoperative history and examination stays valid

Part 1017 / 87

Preventing perioperative stroke in a patient with a previous stroke

After a stroke, defer elective surgery: risk is highest under 3 months, so waiting 6 months beats a short delay. Continue existing antiplatelets regardless.

Why

Time is the main lever. New postoperative stroke risk is highest when surgery falls within 3 months of the index stroke, falls over 3 to 6 and 6 to 11 months, then plateaus near 9 months without returning to baseline. Miller and Barash continue antiplatelets because stopping them adds thrombosis or embolism to surgical hypercoagulability. SNACC finds aspirin continuation does not prevent stroke after noncardiac surgery. Keep antiplatelets running, but credit the delay; for a booked operation, only a 12-month wait among the usual options clears the 9-month plateau.

The trap

Six-week delay substantially reduces perioperative stroke. Delaying surgery is the right instinct, and an older consensus proposed only a brief wait. But six weeks still falls inside the highest-risk period, so it gains little. If this is the alternative, continuing existing antiplatelet therapy is the sounder choice.

Evidence

ACC/AHA data show odds ratios of 14.23 under 3 months, 4.85 at 3 to 6, 3.04 at 6 to 11 and 2.47 beyond 12 months. Miller advises continuing antiplatelets and statins to avoid withdrawal thrombosis; SNACC calls aspirin continuation not indicated for stroke prevention.

Sources: AHA/ACC 2024 · §6.7Miller 10eOutside our books: Perioperative Care of Patients at High Risk for Stroke during or after Non-Cardiac, Non-Neurologic Surgery: Consensus Statement from SNACC (Mashour GA et al.) - 2014 predecessor of the 2020 guideline (2014)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man had an ischaemic stroke 5 weeks ago and is listed for elective hernia repair. When is risk highest?

Within 3 months of the stroke; defer surgery

Common misconception A six-week delay is enough

A woman on clopidogrel after a stroke awaits elective surgery. Stop her antiplatelet?

No; continue existing antiplatelets

Report a problem with entry 17: Preventing perioperative stroke in a patient with a previous stroke

Back to card 3Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsWhich tests

  1. 018No routine laboratory tests for a healthy patient having elective surgery
  2. 019Pregnancy testing before anaesthesia in a woman of childbearing age
  3. 020Obstructive sleep apnoea before surgery: STOP-Bang screening
Part 1018 / 87

No routine laboratory tests for a healthy patient having elective surgery

For a fit, asymptomatic patient having elective surgery, order no routine tests; request one only when history, examination or procedure indicates it.

Why

A test is only useful when there is a real chance the patient has the disease it looks for. In a fit patient, screening finds almost no true disease, adds nothing to prognosis and does not improve outcome. Most abnormal results are false positives. These lead to repeat testing, delays, cost and sometimes harmful treatment. So testing is targeted to the patient: for example, a blood count for malignancy, a bleeding disorder or expected major blood loss.

The trap

Full blood count benefits healthy elective patients. A full blood count feels like a cheap, harmless baseline, especially before day-case surgery. In a fit patient, though, unsuspected anaemia is rare and the result seldom changes the anaesthetic plan. A spurious abnormal value can delay or cancel the case. Order it only for specific risk factors.

Evidence

Both major texts advise against routine preoperative tests in healthy patients: poor diagnostic yield, little prognostic information, no improved outcomes, and false positives that do not change management. Choose tests for specific comorbidities or the type of surgery.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which routine blood tests does a fit 30-year-old need before elective day-case surgery?

None; test only when indicated

Common misconception A full blood count is a harmless baseline

Give one valid indication for a preoperative blood count.

Malignancy, bleeding disorder or expected major blood loss

Report a problem with entry 18: No routine laboratory tests for a healthy patient having elective surgery

Part 1019 / 87

Pregnancy testing before anaesthesia in a woman of childbearing age

Before any anaesthetic in a woman of childbearing age, ask about possible pregnancy; if it cannot be excluded, offer a consented pregnancy test.

Why

Anaesthesia and surgery can harm a fetus, so a positive result changes management. The sources have moved over time. An older, simpler line recommends testing all women of reproductive age. The ASA advisory refines this: offer the test when the result would change management, but do not make it mandatory. Ask every patient, record the discussion and test with consent whenever doubt remains. Routine blood counts, clotting tests or chest films in a fit young patient add little and can lead to costly investigation of false positives.

The trap

Blood count more important than pregnancy testing. A blood count feels like the default baseline before a general anaesthetic, and a fracture suggests blood loss. But a closed reduction in a healthy 20-year-old involves little bleeding, so a normal count changes nothing. Missing a pregnancy would change management.

Evidence

Sources recommend testing women of reproductive age. The ASA view is that the test is offered when it would alter management, with consent, rather than required. Routine testing in healthy patients adds cost and leads to follow-up of false positives.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eOutside our books: Pituitary Surgery (2026)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 22-year-old woman is listed for closed reduction of a wrist fracture. What should you ask before anaesthesia?

Whether she could be pregnant

She is unsure about pregnancy. What do you do?

Offer a consented pregnancy test

Common misconception A blood count is the essential preoperative test

Report a problem with entry 19: Pregnancy testing before anaesthesia in a woman of childbearing age

Part 1020 / 87

Obstructive sleep apnoea before surgery: STOP-Bang screening

Screen undiagnosed suspected OSA with STOP-Bang: under 3 low, 3–4 intermediate (positive), 5–8 high. Known OSA: establish severity and PAP settings, not rescreening.

Why

A higher STOP-Bang score means a greater chance of moderate-to-severe OSA. Miller's box labels any positive screen high risk; Barash and Faust split that range into 3–4 intermediate and 5–8 high, Faust tying 5 or more to worse disease and more complications. So 3 makes the screen positive; 5 makes it high risk. Neck item, two versions: official 40 cm (16 in) or more in either sex; the books' table (Barash, Faust, Miller) 17 in (43 cm) men, 16 in (41 cm) women. Once diagnosed, severity and PAP settings matter.

The trap

Rescreening with STOP-Bang in known OSA. Screening feels like the safe first step, but STOP-Bang only estimates risk in patients not yet diagnosed. Once OSA is established, the step is to confirm how severe it is and which PAP setting is prescribed before operating. Rescreening adds nothing.

Evidence

STOP-Bang: 3–4 positive answers indicate intermediate risk of moderate to severe OSA, and 5–8 indicate high risk. A score of 5 or more predicts more severe OSA and more postoperative complications. SASM guidance favours knowing OSA severity and the recommended PAP settings before surgery.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 58-year-old man for hernia repair has no OSA diagnosis. He snores, is tired, hypertensive and male, so scores 4 on STOP-Bang. What risk category is this?

Intermediate risk (3–4 is a positive screen); 5–8 would be high risk.

A 63-year-old with sleep-study-confirmed OSA on CPAP is listed for knee replacement. Preoperatively, do you rescreen with STOP-Bang or do something else?

Establish severity and PAP settings; rescreening adds nothing once diagnosed.

Common misconception That STOP-Bang screening is the first step even when OSA is already diagnosed

Report a problem with entry 20: Obstructive sleep apnoea before surgery: STOP-Bang screening

Back to card 4Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsRegular medicines: hold or stop

  1. 021Oral hypoglycaemics and apixaban before elective surgery: what to hold and when
  2. 022Warfarin before elective surgery: when to stop and who needs bridging
  3. 023Rheumatoid arthritis medicines that matter most to the anaesthetic
Part 1021 / 87

Oral hypoglycaemics and apixaban before elective surgery: what to hold and when

Withhold oral glucose-lowering tablets on the morning of surgery; stop full-dose apixaban at least 72 hours before neuraxial block, shortening only for low-bleeding-risk surgery.

Why

A fasting patient who still takes an oral agent can become hypoglycaemic, and sulfonylureas carry the greatest risk. So the tablets are omitted that morning and restarted once the patient eats normally. Apixaban is stopped days ahead so its anticoagulant effect has worn off before needle placement. One textbook sets a minimum of 3 days; ASRA sets 72 hours for high-dose therapy. These are the same interval. When the expected major-bleed risk is below 2%, the guideline allows a shorter break with prompt restart.

The trap

Cardiac drugs require day-of-surgery preoperative hold. People fear hypotension or bradycardia under anaesthesia and reach for the cardiac drug. The books do not name it as a day-of-surgery hold. The drug they name is the oral glucose-lowering agent, because fasting while still taking it invites hypoglycaemia.

Evidence

Omit oral hypoglycaemics on the surgical morning and resume with normal diet; sulfonylureas particularly risk hypoglycaemia. Stop apixaban at least 3 days (72 hours at high dose) before neuraxial block. Shorter interruption suits surgery with major-bleed risk below 2%.

Sources: Barash 9eOutside our books: Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: ASRA Pain Medicine evidence-based guidelines (2025)Faust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A diabetic on gliclazide is first on the list. Take it this morning?

No; omit it and restart once eating normally

Common misconception The beta-blocker is the day-of-surgery hold

How long before a spinal should full-dose apixaban stop?

At least 72 hours

Report a problem with entry 21: Oral hypoglycaemics and apixaban before elective surgery: what to hold and when

Part 1022 / 87

Warfarin before elective surgery: when to stop and who needs bridging

Stop warfarin five days pre-surgery; recheck INR the day before; if thrombotic risk is high (e.g. valvular disease with AF), add heparin once INR subtherapeutic.

Why

Warfarin's effect only fades as the INR falls over several days. So the drug is stopped early and the INR is checked again within 24 hours of surgery. Stoelting's valve chapter allows 3 to 5 days and Miller says 5, so five days satisfies both. Stopping leaves the patient unprotected. Low-risk patients can accept that gap. High-risk patients, including those with valve disease on a vitamin K antagonist, get unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin once the INR drops below range. The heparin continues up to the eve or morning of surgery.

The trap

Warfarin cessation alone protects mitral stenosis. A plain five-day stop with an INR check is the correct default and matches the low-risk pathway, so it looks complete. It fails because rheumatic mitral stenosis with AF carries high thrombotic risk. Stopping alone leaves an unprotected gap, so heparin cover is needed once the INR is subtherapeutic.

Evidence

Miller stops vitamin K antagonists five days ahead for low-risk patients, bridges high-risk patients with heparin and advises an INR check within 24 hours. Stoelting's valve chapter stops them 3 to 5 days ahead and starts heparin as soon as the INR is subtherapeutic.

Sources: Miller 10eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
When should warfarin stop before elective surgery, and when is INR rechecked?

Five days before; INR checked the day before

A 52-year-old with rheumatic valve disease in atrial fibrillation has stopped her vitamin K antagonist before surgery. Extra measure?

Heparin cover from when her INR drops below range

Common misconception Stopping warfarin alone suffices whatever the thrombotic risk

Report a problem with entry 22: Warfarin before elective surgery: when to stop and who needs bridging

Part 1023 / 87

Rheumatoid arthritis medicines that matter most to the anaesthetic

In rheumatoid arthritis, chronic corticosteroids matter most to the anaesthetist: give stress-dose hydrocortisone if the patient takes more than 10 mg prednisone daily.

Why

Each rheumatoid drug raises a perioperative issue, but only steroids call for a specific anaesthetic action. Patients on long-term steroids may need supplementation. Above 10 mg prednisone daily, a stress dose of hydrocortisone is given during surgery on top of the usual morning dose. Methotrexate, by contrast, is simply continued. Other DMARDs raise infection risk but do not change antibiotic prophylaxis. NSAIDs mainly prompt you to consider their effect on platelet function.

The trap

Methotrexate needs specific perioperative anaesthetic action. Methotrexate is the anchor DMARD, so it invites worry about immunosuppression, wound healing and a theoretical folate problem with nitrous oxide. Yet current evidence supports continuing it through surgery, and it needs no specific anaesthetic intervention, unlike steroid cover.

Evidence

Stress-dose hydrocortisone is advised during surgery above 10 mg prednisone daily, and long-term steroid users may need supplementation. Methotrexate is continued perioperatively. DMARDs raise infection risk without any change to antibiotic prophylaxis. NSAIDs warrant consideration of their platelet effects.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman with rheumatoid arthritis takes prednisone 15 mg daily. What does she need intraoperatively?

Stress-dose hydrocortisone

What happens to methotrexate around elective surgery?

Continue it

Common misconception Methotrexate needs a specific anaesthetic intervention

Report a problem with entry 23: Rheumatoid arthritis medicines that matter most to the anaesthetic

Back to card 5Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsFasting and antibiotic prophylaxis

  1. 024Clear fluids are allowed up to 2 hours before anaesthesia: a child given apple juice
  2. 025Fasting and aspiration in children: breast milk, formula and the volume that matters
  3. 026Antibiotic prophylaxis: timing before the incision
  4. 027Antibiotic prophylaxis when the incision is delayed after the dose
Part 1024 / 87

Clear fluids are allowed up to 2 hours before anaesthesia: a child given apple juice

Pulp-free apple juice is a clear fluid; if a healthy child drank it two hours ago, proceed with the elective anaesthetic now.

Why

Clear liquids leave the stomach quickly. By the 2-hour mark, residual gastric volume is safe in children as well as adults, so a longer wait does not lower aspiration risk. A longer wait does cause harm: children kept fasting well beyond the guideline can become hypoglycaemic, dehydrated and acidotic, and can become haemodynamically unstable at induction. So once the clear-fluid interval is met, keeping the child waiting longer brings only harm.

The trap

Juice requires longer fasting than clear fluids. Juice feels like more than water, so a further wait seems a cautious compromise. It may also be confused with the longer fasts for milk or formula. But fruit juice without pulp is a clear liquid, the interval is already met, and extra fasting only adds hunger, dehydration and hypoglycaemia.

Evidence

American fasting guidelines list pulp-free fruit juice with water as a clear liquid, requiring a minimum 2-hour fast. The update applies this to healthy children aged 2 to 16. A major text notes near-universal agreement on 2 hours, versus 6 for a light meal.

Sources: Barash 9eOutside our books: Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures (2017)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A healthy 6-year-old drank pulp-free apple juice 2 hours ago before elective grommets. What now?

Proceed now

Common misconception Juice needs a longer wait than water

Is fruit juice without pulp a clear fluid for fasting purposes?

Yes; it needs only a 2-hour fast

Report a problem with entry 24: Clear fluids are allowed up to 2 hours before anaesthesia: a child given apple juice

Part 1025 / 87

Fasting and aspiration in children: breast milk, formula and the volume that matters

Clear fluids to 2 hours satisfies both ASA and European one-hour advice; breast milk 4 hours, formula 6 hours; clear fluids add no gastric volume.

Why

Clear fluids pass through the stomach quickly, so one drunk a couple of hours before induction leaves no larger residual volume and no extra aspiration risk. On that evidence the ASA allows clear fluids to 2 hours, and the newer European paediatric consensus, cited in Miller's, has shortened it to one hour; stopping at 2 hours satisfies both. Milk empties more slowly, human milk faster than formula or cow's milk, so breast milk gets a shorter fast. Pneumonitis classically requires roughly 0.4 mL/kg aspirated at pH below 2.5.

The trap

One millilitre per kilogramme is safe aspiration. A round 1 mL/kg sounds like a sensible paediatric rule of thumb, but the classic pneumonitis threshold is much lower: about 0.4 mL/kg at a pH below 2.5. So a much smaller aspirate can already injure the lung.

Evidence

ASA gives clear liquids 2 hours, breast milk 4, formula and non-human milk 6; breast milk empties faster than other milks. Liberal clear fluids do not increase residual gastric volume; European paediatric consensus permits one hour. Pneumonitis needs 0.4 mL/kg at pH below 2.5.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Minimum fasting times for breast milk and for infant formula?

Breast milk 4 hours; formula 6 hours

What aspirated volume and pH classically cause pneumonitis?

About 0.4 mL/kg at pH below 2.5

Common misconception The threshold is about 1 mL/kg

Report a problem with entry 25: Fasting and aspiration in children: breast milk, formula and the volume that matters

Part 1026 / 87

Antibiotic prophylaxis: timing before the incision

Give prophylactic antibiotics within 60 minutes before incision, or 120 minutes for vancomycin or fluoroquinolones; any time within that window is correct.

Why

Skin organisms enter the bloodstream and wound at incision, so tissue levels must be adequate then and not yet have worn off. A bolus agent such as cefazolin achieves this if started within the final hour. Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones require slow infusion, so are started earlier, up to 120 minutes. Dosing 120 to 180 minutes beforehand increases infections. Barash's 30 minutes to 1 hour, Stoelting's 1 hour and the guideline's 60 minutes describe the same window, not competing time points.

The trap

Antibiotic timing from theatre call is adequate. Sending the dose when the patient is called feels safely early and is a familiar habit. But transfer and waiting times vary, so the drug may go in well over an hour before incision. By then tissue levels are falling and the infection risk is higher.

Evidence

The guideline says to start the antibiotic within 60 minutes before incision, or 120 minutes for vancomycin or fluoroquinolones. Barash's ideal of 30 minutes to 1 hour sits inside this. Dosing within the hour lowers surgical site infection compared with 120 to 180 minutes beforehand.

Sources: Outside our books: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery (2013)Barash 9eFaustStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
When should cefazolin prophylaxis start relative to incision?

Within 60 minutes before incision

Common misconception Give it when the patient is called from the ward

Prophylaxis is vancomycin. How early may the infusion start?

Up to 120 minutes before incision

Report a problem with entry 26: Antibiotic prophylaxis: timing before the incision

Part 1027 / 87

Antibiotic prophylaxis when the incision is delayed after the dose

Give prophylaxis within 60 minutes before incision. If surgery is delayed hours after the dose, give a fresh dose before incision, not after.

Why

Wound protection depends on the tissue drug level at incision and throughout contamination. An older prospective cohort, grouping timing at 2 hours, found far more infections when dosing was 2–24 hours before incision. Later work showed dosing within 60 minutes beat 120 to 180 minutes, so guidelines narrowed the target to 60 minutes. A dose given hours before a delayed start is too old under both standards. Redosing intervals run from the original dose, so waiting until after incision leaves the cut uncovered.

The trap

Intraoperative redosing covers antibiotic need at incision. This looks like routine intraoperative redosing, so it feels safe. But it leaves the incision itself covered only by a dose given hours earlier, in the early window with higher infection rates. Redosing keeps cover going during surgery; it cannot restore cover at the moment of cutting.

Evidence

Guidelines advise intravenous prophylaxis within 60 minutes before skin incision. Dosing within 2 hours before incision gave 0.59% infection, against 3.8% for dosing 2–24 hours early. Dosing within 60 minutes beat 120 to 180 minutes. Redosing intervals count from the preoperative dose.

Sources: FaustOutside our books: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery (2013)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Cefazolin was given 3 hours ago but theatre is delayed; incision is imminent. What now?

Give a fresh dose before incision

Common misconception Redosing after incision restores cover

From when are intraoperative redosing intervals counted?

From the original preoperative dose

Report a problem with entry 27: Antibiotic prophylaxis when the incision is delayed after the dose

Back to card 6Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsSedation and office-based anaesthesia

  1. 028Continuum of sedation: what defines deep sedation
  2. 029Moderate sedation: spontaneous ventilation is usually adequate
  3. 030Moderate sedation: the complications that matter and the deadliest
  4. 031Contraindication to procedural sedation
  5. 032Agitation just before sedation: what to assess first
  6. 033Office-based surgery: the procedure behind most deaths
  7. 034Office-based anaesthesia: the single most important monitor
Part 1028 / 87

Continuum of sedation: what defines deep sedation

Deep sedation: patient is hard to rouse but responds purposefully to repeated or painful stimulation; no response even to pain indicates general anaesthesia.

Why

Sedation is a continuum. Each level is graded by the stimulus needed to get a purposeful response. In minimal sedation the patient answers voice normally, and in moderate sedation voice or light touch still works. Airway and breathing are intact at both levels. As the drug effect deepens, voice and light touch stop working and only repeated or painful stimuli get through. The airway may now need support, although the circulation usually holds. Once even pain cannot rouse the patient, they are under general anaesthesia.

The trap

Sedated appearance indicates deep sedation level. This is tempting because the patient has clearly been given sedative drugs and looks drowsy, so any sedated state can seem 'deep'. But a normal answer to voice is the lightest level, minimal sedation. A deeply sedated patient no longer reliably responds to voice and needs repeated or painful stimulation.

Evidence

Minimal sedation: patient responds normally to voice. Moderate: responds to voice or light touch. Deep: not easily roused, but purposefully responds to repeated or painful stimuli; airway may need assistance. Unarousable to pain indicates general anaesthesia.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During endoscopy a patient no longer answers to voice but pushes the endoscopist's hand away after a firm trapezius squeeze. Sedation level?

Deep sedation

Common misconception A normal answer to voice means deep sedation

Same patient later shows no response even to painful stimulation. What state is this?

General anaesthesia

Report a problem with entry 28: Continuum of sedation: what defines deep sedation

Part 1029 / 87

Moderate sedation: spontaneous ventilation is usually adequate

Under moderate (conscious) sedation, patients breathe spontaneously and adequately without support. 'Unaffected' describes minimal sedation; 'may be impaired' describes deep sedation.

Why

Moderate sedation is defined by a purposeful response to voice or light touch. Sedatives may slightly blunt breathing, but respiratory drive and airway patency remain adequate without airway manoeuvres or assisted breathing. The ASA continuum grades ventilation by depth: minimal sedation leaves it untouched, moderate may blunt it mildly but it stays adequate, and deep may impair it. Barash calls ventilation preserved and Faust allows mild impairment, so both agree it stays adequate. Miller says "usually" because patients can drift deeper, hence drugs are titrated and the patient watched.

The trap

Ventilation remains unaffected in moderate sedation. 'Unaffected' sounds the same as 'adequate', and one textbook calls ventilation 'preserved' at this level. But 'unaffected' is the standard wording for minimal sedation. In moderate sedation breathing may be mildly depressed and still be adequate, so 'unaffected' claims too much.

Evidence

The ASA definition, repeated in the major texts, says that during moderate sedation no airway intervention is needed and spontaneous ventilation is adequate. One table allows at most mild impairment. Ventilation is unaffected under minimal sedation and may be impaired under deep sedation.

Sources: Outside our books: Statement on Continuum of Depth of Sedation: Definition of General Anesthesia and Levels of Sedation/Analgesia (2024)FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is the state of spontaneous ventilation in moderate sedation?

Adequate, needing no support

Common misconception Ventilation is unaffected in moderate sedation

At which sedation level is ventilation described as unaffected?

Minimal sedation

Report a problem with entry 29: Moderate sedation: spontaneous ventilation is usually adequate

Part 1030 / 87

Moderate sedation: the complications that matter and the deadliest

Moderate sedation weakens the reflexes that protect the airway, so it adds aspiration risk. The deadliest complication is oversedation that compromises breathing.

Why

Sedatives depress the laryngeal and pharyngeal reflexes that guard the lower airway, and this can outlast wakefulness: after midazolam, swallowing stays impaired for up to 2 hours. Moderate sedation means, by definition, an airway that needs no support and adequate breathing. Obstruction is therefore not its defining hazard, but sedation can drift deeper. When titration overshoots, the patient slides into deeper sedation with an unsecured airway. Closed-claims data found that respiratory compromise from too much sedation was the leading cause of death or brain injury.

The trap

Obstruction is chief moderate sedation complication. Obstruction feels like the obvious sedation hazard, and it can happen if sedation deepens. But moderate sedation is defined by an airway that needs no intervention, so obstruction is not its typical risk. The leading killer is oversedation with respiratory compromise, and obstruction is only one part of that.

Evidence

Sedation depresses protective laryngeal and pharyngeal reflexes, and midazolam impairs swallowing for up to 2 hours despite wakefulness. Closed-claims analysis named excessive sedation with respiratory compromise as the commonest cause of death. The ASA continuum defines moderate sedation as needing no airway intervention.

Sources: Barash 9eOutside our books: Statement on Continuum of Depth of Sedation: Definition of General Anesthesia and Levels of Sedation/Analgesia (2024)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
In closed-claims data, what most often killed or brain-injured patients receiving moderate sedation?

Too much sedative, depressing breathing

Common misconception Airway obstruction is the defining hazard

Why does moderate sedation add aspiration risk?

It depresses protective laryngeal and pharyngeal reflexes

Report a problem with entry 30: Moderate sedation: the complications that matter and the deadliest

Part 1031 / 87

Contraindication to procedural sedation

Alcohol or drug abuse predicts failed light sedation: plan anaesthetist-delivered deep sedation or general anaesthesia; a brain tumour alone does not bar sedation.

Why

Light sedation works only when the patient can tolerate discomfort and cooperate on modest doses. The awake-surgery literature puts a history of alcohol or drug abuse alongside anxiety, psychiatric illness, chronic pain and low pain tolerance as predictors that sedation will fail. Plan a deeper technique, controlled by an anaesthetist, from the start. In intracranial disease the hazard is raised ICP, not the tumour itself: sedatives depress breathing, carbon dioxide rises and intracranial hypertension gets worse.

The trap

Brain tumour itself contraindicates procedural sedation. Brain tumour sounds dangerous because sedatives can raise ICP. But tumour patients are sedated routinely, even for awake craniotomy. Only raised ICP means sedative premedication must be carefully titrated or avoided, and this option names a tumour, not raised ICP.

Evidence

Risk factors for failed sedation include psychiatric disorders, anxiety, chronic pain, alcohol or drug abuse and poor pain tolerance. Refusal, language barrier, altered mentation or non-cooperation rule out awake craniotomy. With raised ICP, premedication is titrated or omitted because respiratory depression raises PaCO2.

Sources: FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man with heavy alcohol use is booked for a painful procedure under light sedation. What should you plan?

Anaesthetist-delivered deep sedation or general anaesthesia

Does a brain tumour without raised ICP bar procedural sedation?

No; only raised ICP calls for caution

Common misconception A brain tumour itself contraindicates sedation

Report a problem with entry 31: Contraindication to procedural sedation

Part 1032 / 87

Agitation just before sedation: what to assess first

If a patient becomes agitated before sedation, exclude hypoxaemia first, then other physiological causes, before attributing restlessness to fear or pain.

Why

Restlessness can be an early sign that the brain is short of oxygen or substrate. Hypoxaemia, low glucose, low blood pressure and acidaemia all disturb mental clarity and can cause agitation. If you give a sedative or analgesic at that point, you hide the warning sign and leave the real problem untreated. Once the physiology is normal, it then matters whether the distress is anxiety or pain. Benzodiazepines do not relieve pain, and opioids are poor anxiolytic sedatives.

The trap

Assume anxiety without first checking hypoxia. Fear is tempting because people are often anxious before a procedure, and the sedative in your hand looks like the cure. But anxiety is a diagnosis you make only after excluding physiological causes. Sedating a patient who is hypoxic treats the symptom and masks a dangerous cause.

Evidence

Barash advises against giving sedatives or analgesics when altered mental status could reflect hypoxaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypotension or acidaemia. It notes that metabolic upsets such as hypoglycaemia cause agitation. Miller lists hypoxia among the precipitating causes to check promptly in a confused patient.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman becomes restless just before sedation for colonoscopy. What do you exclude first?

Hypoxaemia

Before treating pre-sedation agitation as fear, which physiological causes must be excluded?

Hypoxaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypotension and acidaemia

Common misconception Agitation before a procedure is simply fear

Report a problem with entry 32: Agitation just before sedation: what to assess first

Part 1033 / 87

Office-based surgery: the procedure behind most deaths

Abdominoplasty is the office procedure most often linked to death, usually through pulmonary embolism. This ranking comes from outside reviews, not the textbooks.

Why

Pulmonary embolism, rather than intra-operative events, accounts for most deaths following office-based surgery. In the accreditation-registry review by Keyes and colleagues, embolism lay behind 13 of 23 deaths, while just one death occurred during the operation. That review and the one by Young and colleagues both attribute these fatal emboli chiefly to abdominoplasty. The textbook quotes a separate mortality figure for liposuction, 19.1 per 100,000, with embolism diagnosed in 23.1% of those deaths. It does not rank the procedures by risk, so that ranking derives solely from the external sources.

The trap

Liposuction has highest office-surgery mortality rate. Liposuction is tempting because it is the most common cosmetic procedure, and the textbook discusses its deaths and gives a liposuction mortality rate. That rate does not compare procedures. The outside reviews that do compare them put abdominoplasty first, through fatal embolism.

Evidence

Outside the textbooks, Keyes and colleagues found embolism caused 13 of 23 outpatient deaths, and, like Young and colleagues, named abdominoplasty as the procedure most tied to fatal embolism. The textbook gives liposuction mortality of 19.1 per 100,000, embolism in 23.1%, without comparing procedures.

Sources: Outside our books: Mortality in outpatient surgery (2008)Outside our books: Office-based surgery and patient outcomes (2018)Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which office procedure is most linked to death in outside reviews?

Abdominoplasty

Common misconception Liposuction is the deadliest office procedure

What is the usual cause of death after office-based surgery?

Pulmonary embolism

Report a problem with entry 33: Office-based surgery: the procedure behind most deaths

Part 1034 / 87

Office-based anaesthesia: the single most important monitor

In office-based or monitored sedation, the most important monitor is a vigilant, trained anaesthetist staying with the patient throughout; devices merely supplement this.

Why

No machine can judge the whole patient. The anaesthetist keeps checking how the patient responds to voice. This lets them adjust sedation depth and spot early neurological, respiratory or cardiovascular trouble before it becomes serious. They also keep watching, touching and listening to the patient. Standard monitors make this clinical watchfulness work better, so every room should have them. But a monitor does not replace the clinician. A device measures one variable, while the clinician pulls everything together.

The trap

Oximetry is most critical safety monitor. Pulse oximetry is tempting because it is the device most linked to safe sedation and it picks up falling oxygen saturation. But it is one device measuring one variable. It only supports a clinician who is present and paying attention, and the textbook ranks that clinician above every machine.

Evidence

The textbook names a careful, well-trained anaesthetist as the most vital monitor, expected to stay in the room throughout. Monitoring devices enhance their performance, and checking the patient's response to voice guides sedation and aids early detection of problems.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
In a dental surgery giving intravenous sedation, what safeguard outranks every device?

An attentive, skilled anaesthetist who never leaves the room

What role do pulse oximetry and other devices play in office sedation?

They supplement, not replace, the clinician

Common misconception Pulse oximetry is the most important monitor

Report a problem with entry 34: Office-based anaesthesia: the single most important monitor

Back to card 7Back to contents

Part 1 · DecisionsPreventing nausea and vomiting

  1. 035Apfel score: counting the risk factors and the predicted risk
  2. 036Strongest risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting
  3. 037History of nausea and vomiting after renal transplant: the anaesthetic technique
Part 1035 / 87

Apfel score: counting the risk factors and the predicted risk

Count only stated factors: female, non-smoker, prior PONV/motion sickness, postoperative opioids. A smoking woman with prior PONV scores two = 40%, under local or general.

Why

Each of the four predictors raises risk on its own, so the score is a simple count. The points convert to risk in steps: none about 10%, one 20%, two 40%, three 60% and four 80%. Smoking protects, so a smoker loses the non-smoker point. Opioids score only when you are told they will be given. The type of operation and the anaesthetic technique are not on the list. Local anaesthesia therefore neither adds nor removes a point: female sex plus prior PONV is still two points, which is 40%.

The trap

Opioid automatically increases PONV risk points. Adding an opioid point because laparoscopic cholecystectomy usually needs opioids gives three factors and 60%. Only stated predictors count; smoking removes the non-smoker point, leaving female sex and prior PONV: two factors, 40%. Local anaesthesia changes nothing either way, so carpal tunnel release under local is also 40%.

Evidence

The guideline and the textbooks list the same four predictors: female sex, prior PONV or motion sickness, not smoking, and postoperative opioids. They predict an incidence of about 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80% for none, one, two, three and all four factors.

Sources: Outside our books: Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (2020)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A smoking woman with previous PONV has a laparoscopic cholecystectomy; opioid use is not stated. Apfel risk?

Two factors: 40%

Common misconception An unstated opioid counts as a factor

Predicted PONV risk with three Apfel factors?

About 60%

Report a problem with entry 35: Apfel score: counting the risk factors and the predicted risk

Part 1036 / 87

Strongest risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting

Female sex is the single strongest patient predictor of PONV; other independent factors are previous PONV or motion sickness, non-smoking, younger age, postoperative opioids.

Why

Prospective adult studies found a small set of traits that each add PONV risk independently. Risk rises with every extra factor; the simplified Apfel score counts four of them: female sex, non-smoking, prior PONV or motion sickness, and postoperative opioids. Of these traits, being a woman adds the most. Smoking protects, so a smoker scores lower, not higher. Postoperative opioids add risk. That is why opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, for example NSAIDs, lowers baseline risk. A male patient lacks the main factor, so male sex is not a risk factor.

The trap

Prior PONV is strongest risk factor. A past episode of PONV feels like the most direct proof that a patient is susceptible, and it is a real independent risk factor. But prospective adult studies rank female gender above it as the strongest single predictor.

Evidence

A review source names female gender as the strongest independent predictor, both of PONV and of needing rescue antiemetics. The consensus guideline lists female sex, previous PONV or motion sickness, non-smoking and young age, and advises cutting opioids through multimodal analgesia.

Sources: Mayo reviewOutside our books: Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (2020)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which single patient factor most strongly predicts PONV?

Female sex

Common misconception Previous PONV is the strongest predictor

Does smoking raise or lower PONV risk?

Lowers it

Report a problem with entry 36: Strongest risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting

Part 1037 / 87

History of nausea and vomiting after renal transplant: the anaesthetic technique

With a prior history of PONV, choose propofol-based TIVA over volatile anaesthesia, add multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis, and use regional techniques to spare opioids.

Why

Volatile agents are a major cause of postoperative vomiting, and switching to a different inhaled agent does not avoid it. Running anaesthesia on a propofol infusion removes that trigger, and propofol itself has a low emetic profile, so vomiting falls substantially. A previous episode of PONV marks the patient as high risk. That calls for prophylaxis combining several antiemetic classes, not a single rescue drug. Opioids cause more nausea the more is given, so regional blocks and non-opioid analgesia reduce nausea by cutting opioid need.

The trap

Volatile agent appropriate after PONV history. Volatile anaesthesia is the familiar default and can seem the neutral choice for a transplant patient. But it keeps the strongest avoidable emetic trigger, whichever inhaled agent is used. In someone who has already had PONV, propofol TIVA removes that trigger.

Evidence

Propofol TIVA greatly lowers PONV compared with pure volatile anaesthesia, and inhaled agents differ little from one another. Every patient's risk should be assessed. Those with risk factors get prophylaxis, high-risk patients get combined regimens, and regional analgesia reduces opioid-related adverse effects.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man vomited for a day after his renal transplant and now needs a fistula revision. Maintenance technique?

Propofol-based TIVA

Common misconception Changing to another volatile avoids vomiting

Besides TIVA, what else does a high-risk PONV patient need?

Multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis and opioid-sparing regional analgesia

Report a problem with entry 37: History of nausea and vomiting after renal transplant: the anaesthetic technique

Back to card 8Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionLaparoscopy on the monitors

  1. 038Low ECG voltage during laparoscopy near the diaphragm
  2. 039Desaturation with a widened arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gap during laparoscopy
  3. 040Capnothorax: recognising it during laparoscopy
Part 2038 / 87

Low ECG voltage during laparoscopy near the diaphragm

During laparoscopy near the diaphragm, a new fall in ECG amplitude suggests capnothorax until proven otherwise, even if vital signs remain stable.

Why

Insufflated CO2 under pressure can reach the pleural space. It may pass through a breach in the diaphragm or falciform ligament, or through natural openings such as the oesophageal hiatus, aortic hiatus and caval opening. Dissecting close to the diaphragm raises this risk. Gas collecting in the chest can shift the cardiac electrical axis and reduce the QRS amplitude. A simple capnothorax may leave the circulation intact. High airway pressure, hypoxia and severe hypotension come with tension physiology. Stable vital signs therefore do not exclude capnothorax.

The trap

Pericardial effusion causes sudden voltage drop. Pericardial effusion is the classic cause of low QRS voltage, but nothing explains one appearing mid-surgery in a previously healthy patient. A sudden voltage drop during diaphragmatic dissection under CO2 insufflation instead suggests gas tracking into the chest.

Evidence

Capnothorax is more likely when surgery is close to the diaphragm. Its early signs include a shift in the ECG axis and reduced amplitude, together with surgical emphysema of the upper torso and marked hypercarbia. Tension capnothorax adds high airway pressure, hypoxia and severe hypotension.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During laparoscopic fundoplication the QRS amplitude suddenly falls; vital signs are stable. Suspect?

Capnothorax

Common misconception New low voltage means pericardial effusion

Do stable vital signs exclude capnothorax during upper abdominal laparoscopy?

No

Report a problem with entry 38: Low ECG voltage during laparoscopy near the diaphragm

Part 2039 / 87

Desaturation with a widened arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gap during laparoscopy

In laparoscopy, low saturation with a widened arterial to end-tidal CO2 gap indicates dead space, so suspect gas embolism; shunt alone barely changes the gap.

Why

End-tidal carbon dioxide comes only from alveoli that have blood flowing past them. An embolus blocks pulmonary blood flow, so the alveoli beyond it are ventilated but not perfused. Their gas has no carbon dioxide in it and dilutes the exhaled sample. End-tidal falls while arterial carbon dioxide holds steady, so the gap widens. With shunt, blood bypasses ventilated lung. Carbon dioxide crosses the membrane so easily that end-tidal still tracks arterial values. Oxygen falls, but the gap hardly moves.

The trap

Endobronchial tube widens arterio-alveolar CO2 gradient. In laparoscopy the pneumoperitoneum and head-down tilt push the carina upwards. The tube can then slip into a bronchus and cause hypoxaemia, so this choice feels likely. But one-lung intubation is a shunt. It lowers oxygen but leaves the carbon dioxide gap almost unchanged. It cannot explain a widened gap.

Evidence

Anything that cuts pulmonary blood flow, such as embolism or cardiac arrest, adds alveolar dead space and widens the gap between end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide. Shunt hardly changes that gap, because carbon dioxide diffuses rapidly across the alveolar membrane.

Sources: Mayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Mid-laparoscopy, SpO2 sinks while PaCO2 stays put and capnography reads far lower. Likely event?

Gas embolism

A tube slipped into one bronchus lowers SpO2. Why does capnography still track PaCO2 closely?

Shunt barely affects CO2, which diffuses freely

Common misconception One-lung intubation widens the CO2 gap

Report a problem with entry 39: Desaturation with a widened arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gap during laparoscopy

Part 2040 / 87

Capnothorax: recognising it during laparoscopy

During CO2 laparoscopy, rising end-tidal CO2 with hypoxia and one-sided hyperresonance and reduced air entry is capnothorax, a CO2 pneumothorax. Choose that specific name.

Why

Insufflated CO2 can escape the peritoneum and reach the pleura, either by dissecting through the mediastinum or by passing through congenital diaphragmatic channels. Pleural gas causes one-sided chest signs and hypoxia. Because the gas is CO2, end-tidal CO2 also rises. The two books name this differently: Barash calls it capnothorax and labels it a CO2 pneumothorax, while Miller calls it pneumothorax from gas tracking through the diaphragm. Capnothorax is the specific type of pneumothorax, so it is the more precise label.

The trap

Pneumothorax is correct diagnosis term. Rising end-tidal CO2 with one-sided hyperresonance and reduced air entry suggests pneumothorax (Miller's term), but the specific diagnosis is capnothorax (Barash): pleural insufflated CO2. Choose the specific term when offered.

Evidence

Barash defines capnothorax as CO2 collecting in the pleura after it leaves the peritoneum. It lists capnothorax as a cause of both hypercarbia and hypoxia in laparoscopy, with severe hypercarbia as an early sign. Miller reports the same event as pneumothorax through diaphragmatic channels.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During CO2 laparoscopy end-tidal CO2 rises, saturation falls and one side is hyperresonant with poor air entry. Most specific diagnosis?

Capnothorax

Common misconception Plain pneumothorax is the more precise label

By which routes can insufflated CO2 reach the pleura?

Through the mediastinum or diaphragmatic channels

Report a problem with entry 40: Capnothorax: recognising it during laparoscopy

Back to card 9Back to contents

Part 2 · RecognitionFluid responsiveness on the monitor

  1. 041High pleth variability index during abdominal surgery: what to give
  2. 042Hypotension with a low pleth variability index
Part 2041 / 87

High pleth variability index during abdominal surgery: what to give

In a ventilated, fully paralysed, adequately anaesthetised patient, high pleth variability index indicates preload responsiveness; give crystalloid fluid challenge, not more drugs.

Why

Positive-pressure breaths repeatedly change intrathoracic blood volume and venous return. When stroke volume depends on preload, the amplitude of the pulse-oximeter waveform rises and falls with each breath. The index expresses that swing, so a large value predicts that giving volume will raise output. The signal is cleanest under controlled ventilation with full paralysis. Arrhythmia, tidal volume, temperature and ambient light make it less reliable, and so does spontaneous effort in a patient who is not paralysed. There is also no agreed cut-off.

The trap

More paralysis explains high pleth variability. The waveform can swing because the patient is breathing against the ventilator, and the index is unreliable without paralysis, so more relaxant looks logical. But the twitch monitor already shows profound block. The swing is not breathing effort; it reflects preload dependence.

Evidence

Breath-to-breath swings in the plethysmographic waveform predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Fluid therapy guided by the index improved outcomes in major abdominal surgery. Several physical confounders limit it, thresholds lack consensus, and it performs poorly in ventilated patients who are not paralysed.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During a ventilated, fully paralysed Whipple procedure, the pleth variability index is high. What does it indicate and what do you give?

Preload responsiveness; give a crystalloid fluid challenge

Twitch monitoring shows profound block, yet the pleth index swings widely. Is more relaxant indicated?

No; the swing reflects preload dependence, not breathing effort

Common misconception A high index means the patient is fighting the ventilator

Report a problem with entry 41: High pleth variability index during abdominal surgery: what to give

Part 2042 / 87

Hypotension with a low pleth variability index

A low PVI predicts little stroke-volume gain from fluid; treat the hypotension with a vasopressor, not another bolus.

Why

PVI measures how much the pleth amplitude swings with each ventilated breath. Big swings mean the ventricle is on the steep Frank–Starling limb and fluid lifts stroke volume; small swings mean it is near the plateau, so fluid adds little. Miller warns thresholds are not agreed and the signal is easily confounded. Outside the textbooks, Cannesson's study and Liu's meta-analysis show cut-offs vary between studies, but a very low reading falls beneath all of them, so the disagreement does not change the decision.

The trap

Fluid bolus raises pressure with low PVI. Tachycardia and hypotension during an acute abdomen look like hypovolaemia, and a crystalloid bolus is the reflex first step. But a low PVI says the ventricle will not convert extra preload into stroke volume, so the bolus fails to lift pressure and only adds fluid load.

Evidence

Outside the textbooks, Cannesson found a pre-bolus PVI above 14% separated fluid responders from non-responders (81% sensitive, 100% specific). Miller notes little agreement on thresholds. Stoelting turns to vasopressors once intravascular volume is judged adequate.

Sources: Outside our books: Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre (2008)Stoelting 8eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A ventilated man with an acute abdomen has had 2 L of crystalloid. He remains hypotensive and tachycardic, and his PVI is very low. Treatment?

A vasopressor

Common misconception Every hypotensive tachycardic patient needs a fluid bolus

What does a very low PVI predict about a fluid bolus?

Little gain in stroke volume

Report a problem with entry 42: Hypotension with a low pleth variability index

Back to card 10Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsPositioning: nerves and eyes

  1. 043Lithotomy: the common peroneal is the commonest motor nerve injury
  2. 044Nerve injured by repeated blood pressure cuff inflation
  3. 045Beach-chair position: blood pressure measurement and cerebral perfusion
  4. 046Prone positioning: chest supports and eye safety
  5. 047Visual loss hours after spine surgery: the immediate action
  6. 048Blindness in one eye soon after prone spine surgery: the cause
  7. 049Intraocular pressure: the normal range and the rise on lying supine
Part 3043 / 87

Lithotomy: the common peroneal is the commonest motor nerve injury

For lithotomy, answer common peroneal, also called common fibular, as the commonest motor nerve injury; obturator leads only a prospective count of all lower-limb neuropathies.

Why

The common peroneal nerve, a sciatic branch also called the common fibular or external popliteal nerve, runs superficially around the fibular head, so a stirrup bar or leg-holder frame can crush it against bone, giving foot drop. Hip hyperflexion with knee extension stretches the parent sciatic nerve too. The two counts fit: Miller's large retrospective review ranked motor neuropathies, where peroneal made up 78%; Barash cites a prospective series counting every lower-limb neuropathy, where obturator was most frequent and sciatic plus peroneal fewer.

The trap

Obturator is commonest motor nerve injury. Obturator is tempting because a prospective series found it the most frequent lower-limb neuropathy after lithotomy. That ranking counts every neuropathy. For the commonest motor injury, which is the classic foot-drop palsy from stirrup compression at the fibular head, the answer is common peroneal.

Evidence

Miller: in a large lithotomy review, common peroneal injury was the commonest lower-limb motor neuropathy at 78%, caused by compression between fibular head and leg-support frame. Barash: a prospective series found obturator 50 per 10,000, sciatic and common peroneal 30 per 10,000.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo reviewBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After hours in lithotomy, a woman wakes with foot drop. Which nerve?

Common peroneal (common fibular)

Common misconception Obturator is the commonest motor injury in lithotomy

Where is that nerve compressed in lithotomy?

Against the fibular head by the stirrup or leg-holder

Report a problem with entry 43: Lithotomy: the common peroneal is the commonest motor nerve injury

Part 3044 / 87

Nerve injured by repeated blood pressure cuff inflation

A repeatedly cycling or long-standing upper-arm blood pressure cuff puts the radial nerve at greatest risk; in long cases, move the cuff periodically.

Why

The radial nerve spirals around the shaft of the humerus in the musculospiral groove. On the lateral side of the mid-arm it lies directly against bone, so an encircling cuff crushes it against the humerus with every inflation. Frequent automated cycling, or hours of use in one spot, adds these compressions together until a neurapraxia results. Changing the cuff site during very long operations spreads the pressure and reduces the risk.

The trap

Ulnar nerve injury. Ulnar is the reflex answer for arm neuropathy, and Mayo lists ulnar paraesthesia among automated-cuff complications. But the cuff sits on the mid-arm, where the radial nerve winds around the humeral shaft, is pinned against bone with each inflation, and is the nerve Barash and most published cuff injuries name.

Evidence

Barash lists excessive automated cuff cycling among causes of radial compression on the lateral arm, where the nerve can be pressed against bone; its spiralling course makes it prone to compression neurapraxia, and relocating the cuff every few hours in very prolonged cases is advised.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During a 6-hour case, an automated upper-arm cuff cycles every 2 minutes. Postoperatively wrist drop appears. Which nerve is most at risk?

Radial nerve, compressed against the humerus in the musculospiral groove.

Arm neuropathy after a cuff: ulnar is the reflex answer. Why is it wrong for a mid-arm cuff, and what can be done in long cases?

The radial nerve lies against the humeral shaft; move the cuff periodically.

Common misconception That the ulnar nerve is the one injured by an upper-arm cuff

Report a problem with entry 44: Nerve injured by repeated blood pressure cuff inflation

Part 3045 / 87

Beach-chair position: blood pressure measurement and cerebral perfusion

In beach-chair, reference arterial pressure to brain level: zero the transducer at the external ear, keep any cuff on the arm, never the leg.

Why

Sitting up raises the brain above the heart, so the blood column between them leaves the circle of Willis at a lower pressure than the arm; the posture lowers cerebral perfusion and may drop systemic pressure. A heart-level transducer or arm cuff overstates brain pressure; a leg cuff overstates it even more. The external auditory meatus marks brain level. Miller's text notes the gradient's relevance has been questioned, but as that is unsettled, the safe course is measuring at, or correcting to, brain level.

The trap

Calf cuff accurately measures cerebral perfusion. A calf cuff looks convenient because it keeps the cuff away from the operative shoulder. But the leg sits far below the brain, so its reading exaggerates cerebral pressure even more than an arm cuff and can hide cerebral hypoperfusion.

Evidence

Positions with the head above the heart reduce cerebral perfusion pressure. An arterial transducer should be zeroed at circle of Willis level, and the external auditory meatus is the gold-standard reference. Lower-limb cuffs widen the gradient further. Some have questioned whether the gradient matters.

Sources: Miller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Upright shoulder arthroscopy: to judge cerebral perfusion, to what height do you level the pressure transducer?

Ear canal height, a proxy for the brain

Why should the cuff never go on the calf in beach-chair?

It overstates brain pressure even more than the arm

Common misconception A leg cuff is a convenient equivalent

Report a problem with entry 45: Beach-chair position: blood pressure measurement and cerebral perfusion

Part 3046 / 87

Prone positioning: chest supports and eye safety

Prone chest supports sit below the axillae, clavicle to iliac crest; keep globes pressure-free; ischaemic optic neuropathy, not retinal artery occlusion, causes most visual loss.

Why

Padding belongs under the chest, below the axillae, not inside them. An older Barash figure runs the rolls towards the groin. Miller's later warns that going past the iliac crests compresses the femoral vessels and nerve, so the safe span runs from clavicle to crest. A poorly supported head that presses on the globe lowers ocular perfusion pressure, and hypotension lowers it further, risking retinal ischaemia. Even so, most visual loss after prone spine surgery is ischaemic optic neuropathy, not pressure-related retinal occlusion.

The trap

Pressure-related retinal occlusion. Retinal artery occlusion feels like the classic prone eye injury because headrest pressure on the globe can cause it. People therefore assume it is the commonest cause. Registry data show ischaemic optic neuropathy is far more frequent.

Evidence

Barash advises padding under the chest, below the axillae. Miller's places supports from clavicles to iliac crests, warning that going further compresses femoral structures. Globe pressure reduces ocular perfusion; hypotension worsens it. Ischaemic optic neuropathy caused 83 of 93 registry visual-loss cases.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Where do the chest supports belong for a prone spinal fusion?

Below the axillae, from clavicle to iliac crest

Which cause accounts for most visual loss after prone spine surgery?

Ischaemic optic neuropathy

Common misconception That headrest pressure on the globe makes retinal occlusion the leading cause

Report a problem with entry 46: Prone positioning: chest supports and eye safety

Part 3047 / 87

Visual loss hours after spine surgery: the immediate action

Examine the eyes at the bedside and obtain immediate ophthalmology assessment for any new visual loss after prone spine surgery; never reassure and wait.

Why

Most visual loss after spine surgery is posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. The part of the optic nerve behind the globe has a watershed blood supply, so it is vulnerable during long, bloody prone cases. It usually appears within 24 to 48 hours, often on waking, so a complaint later the same day fits. Field loss, reduced acuity, no light perception or a pupil change needs urgent specialist examination to tell optic neuropathy apart from retinal artery occlusion or cortical blindness.

The trap

Urgent brain imaging before eye examination. Cortical blindness is a recognised cause, so urgent brain imaging feels decisive. But most cases are optic nerve ischaemia, which even orbital MRI often misses. Both textbooks and the ASA advisory put immediate ophthalmological examination first; imaging follows that call, to exclude intracranial causes such as cortical blindness.

Evidence

Both textbooks say that eye pain, no light perception, field loss, reduced acuity or a lost pupil response needs immediate ophthalmological examination. Most spine cases are posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, which usually appears within 24 to 48 hours of surgery, often on waking.

Sources: FaustMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A 62-year-old reports blurred vision and a field defect 8 hours after a long, bloody prone lumbar fusion. What is the immediate action?

Examine the eyes and obtain immediate ophthalmology assessment.

After prone spine surgery a patient cannot see from one eye. Urgent brain MRI is suggested first for cortical blindness. Why is that the wrong first step?

Most cases are optic nerve ischaemia; ophthalmological examination comes first, imaging follows.

Common misconception That urgent brain imaging is the first step for postoperative visual loss

Report a problem with entry 47: Visual loss hours after spine surgery: the immediate action

Part 3048 / 87

Blindness in one eye soon after prone spine surgery: the cause

With one blind eye after prone spine surgery and no globe-pressure clue, answer posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy; choose retinal artery occlusion only with pressure signs.

Why

Textbooks rank posterior ION first after prone spinal fusion. Long, bloody operations in obese men on a Wilson frame starve the optic nerve behind the globe. Because the cause is systemic, both eyes are usually hit, but one eye can be affected alone, so one-sided loss does not settle it. Retinal artery occlusion needs external pressure on the globe, so the case must show that pressure. Cortical blindness dominated one paediatric scoliosis database, but it darkens both eyes, so a single blind eye argues against it.

The trap

Retinal occlusion from eye compression. One eye blind after prone positioning invites retinal artery occlusion, which is a genuine prone injury. But it requires external pressure on the globe, and nothing here suggests it. Ischaemic optic neuropathy can also strike a single eye and is far commoner after spine surgery.

Evidence

Barash ranks posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy as the main cause of post-spine visual loss, ahead of retinal occlusion and cortical blindness. Miller says ION may be one- or two-sided, mostly bilateral, while retinal occlusion usually follows eye compression. A paediatric database found only cortical blindness.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10eOutside our books: Visual loss after corrective surgery for pediatric scoliosis: incidence and risk factors from a nationwide database (2016)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Following a 7-hour, high-blood-loss lumbar fusion on a Wilson frame, a heavy man has lost sight on the left. Eyes were well padded. Cause?

Ischaemia of the optic nerve behind the globe

Common misconception One blind eye means retinal artery occlusion

What feature must be present before retinal artery occlusion becomes the likely cause?

Signs of external pressure on the globe

Report a problem with entry 48: Blindness in one eye soon after prone spine surgery: the cause

Part 3049 / 87

Intraocular pressure: the normal range and the rise on lying supine

Normal IOP is roughly 12–20 mmHg (16 ± 5); above 25 mmHg is pathological; lying supine adds only a small rise, up to 6 mmHg.

Why

Barash gives a normal range of 12–20 mmHg, with a daily swing of 2 to 3 mmHg. Miller gives a mean of 16 ± 5 mmHg and regards readings above 25 mmHg as abnormal. Together, values in the high teens are normal and only readings above 25 mmHg suggest disease. Posture normally influences pressure: Miller lists supine, prone and head-down positions as raising it, and Barash says a change of position raises it by about 6 mmHg at most.

The trap

Normal absolute pressure range. This range looks familiar because it is almost exactly the normal resting pressure. Someone who confuses the absolute value with the change caused by posture will pick it. Lying flat adds only a few mmHg, and at most 6.

Evidence

Barash gives normal pressure as 12–20 mmHg with a small diurnal swing; position change can raise it by up to 6 mmHg. Miller gives 16 ± 5 mmHg, calls readings above 25 mmHg pathological, and names lying supine as a physiological cause of a rise.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What is the normal range of intraocular pressure?

About 12 to 20 mmHg

How much does lying supine raise intraocular pressure?

A small rise, at most about 6 mmHg

Common misconception Posture shifts IOP by a full normal range

Report a problem with entry 49: Intraocular pressure: the normal range and the rise on lying supine

Back to card 11Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsLaparoscopy goes wrong

  1. 050Subcutaneous emphysema with rising carbon dioxide and hypotension during laparoscopy
  2. 051Dilated cardiomyopathy with hypotension and hypercarbia during laparoscopy: the next step
  3. 052Desaturation after head-down tilt during laparoscopy
  4. 053Bradycardia or asystole at the start of insufflation: the mechanism
  5. 054PEEP during laparoscopy and the fall in blood pressure
  6. 055Oliguria during laparoscopy
  7. 056Tachycardia minutes after a desflurane step-up at the start of laparoscopy
Part 3050 / 87

Subcutaneous emphysema with rising carbon dioxide and hypotension during laparoscopy

Emphysema with hypercarbia alone: hyperventilate, desufflate if inadequate. Add hypotension, hypoxia or high airway pressure: suspect tension capnothorax: desufflate immediately, support circulation, decompress if severe.

Why

Subcutaneous emphysema is insufflated carbon dioxide that has escaped the peritoneum into tissue; absorbed from there, it raises arterial carbon dioxide, which extra ventilation can clear, so hyperventilation comes first and desufflation only if it fails. The same gas can track into the pleural space. Once it pressurises the chest, hyperventilation alone no longer suffices: airway pressure rises, oxygenation falls and blood pressure drops. Removing the source by immediate desufflation is primary; fluids or vasopressors bridge the circulation, and needle or chest drain decompression is reserved for severe cases.

The trap

Suction tube obstruction. High peak pressure and desaturation suggest a blocked or kinked tube, so suctioning feels like the reflex airway check. But tube obstruction does not explain upper-torso emphysema, severe hypercarbia and hypotension together; that cluster points to pressurised carbon dioxide in the chest, and suction delays stopping the gas source.

Evidence

Tension capnothorax presents acutely with high airway pressure, hypoxia and severe hypotension; its primary treatment is immediate desufflation, with haemodynamic support and, in severe cases, needle or chest drain decompression. Simple subcutaneous emphysema is treated with hyperventilation, desufflating if that fails.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During laparoscopic hernia repair, crepitus spreads over the abdomen and end-tidal CO2 climbs; pressure and saturation are normal. First step?

Hyperventilate; desufflate if that fails

The same patient now becomes hypotensive and hypoxic with high airway pressure. Primary treatment?

Immediate desufflation, circulatory support, decompress if severe

Common misconception Suctioning the tube comes first

Report a problem with entry 50: Subcutaneous emphysema with rising carbon dioxide and hypotension during laparoscopy

Part 3051 / 87

Dilated cardiomyopathy with hypotension and hypercarbia during laparoscopy: the next step

During laparoscopy, hypotension that persists despite fluid and vasopressor in a failing heart means reduce or release the pneumoperitoneum next, not more pressor or fluid.

Why

Raised abdominal pressure squeezes the vena cava, cutting venous return, and raises systemic vascular resistance; in patients with cardiac disease it lowers ejection fraction and cardiac index. A poorly contracting ventricle cannot overcome that extra afterload, so fluid simply congests it and a pure vasoconstrictor adds further afterload. Letting the gas out does the opposite: resistance falls and ejection fraction and cardiac index rise above baseline. Hypercarbia adds vasodilatation and myocardial depression, so ventilation should also be optimised, but it does not remove the mechanical cause.

The trap

Raising ventilation to wash out CO2. The raised carbon dioxide and low saturation make ventilation look like the culprit, and extra minute ventilation does correct hypercarbia. But the hypotension has already failed fluid and vasopressor. The books escalate refractory hypotension to abdominal decompression, which is also the step for hypoxia that will not resolve.

Evidence

Transient hypotension at laparoscopy responds to less volatile, fluid or lower abdominal pressure. Refractory hypotension needs immediate decompression and neutral positioning. In patients with cardiac risk, pneumoperitoneum raises resistance and lowers ejection fraction, and desufflation reverses this. More minute ventilation usually controls carbon dioxide.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A man with dilated cardiomyopathy stays hypotensive at laparoscopy despite fluid and a vasopressor. Next step?

Reduce or release the pneumoperitoneum

Common misconception Adjusting ventilation fixes the refractory hypotension

Why do more fluid and vasoconstrictor fail in that failing heart?

Fluid congests it; vasoconstriction adds afterload

Report a problem with entry 51: Dilated cardiomyopathy with hypotension and hypercarbia during laparoscopy: the next step

Part 3052 / 87

Desaturation after head-down tilt during laparoscopy

If a patient desaturates soon after head-down tilt for laparoscopy, suspect endobronchial migration of the tube first; auscultate both sides and withdraw the tube.

Why

When the patient is tipped head-down, the abdominal contents and the gas-filled abdomen push the diaphragm up. This moves the mediastinum and carina towards the head. The tube is fixed at the mouth, so its tip is now relatively deeper and can enter a main bronchus. One-lung ventilation then causes shunt and hypoxaemia. The same tilt also reduces lung volume and compliance and raises airway pressures, which encourages atelectasis. A tube placed with its cuff only just below the cords leaves more room before the tip reaches the carina.

The trap

Gas embolism. Gas embolism is a known danger of laparoscopy, so it sounds dramatic and plausible. But it usually happens while the abdomen is being insufflated and presents as cardiovascular collapse. Desaturation that starts when the patient is tilted points to the tube moving relative to the carina.

Evidence

Head-down positioning reduces functional residual capacity and compliance and raises peak pressures, leading to atelectasis and hypoxia. The carina shifts towards the head, so the tube tip can enter a main bronchus and need repositioning. Cuff placement just beyond the cords is advised.

Sources: FaustBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Minutes after head-down tilt for laparoscopic hysterectomy, saturation falls to 89%. Suspect first?

Endobronchial migration of the tube

Common misconception Gas embolism is the first suspect

How should you respond to suspected tube migration after tilting?

Auscultate both sides and withdraw the tube

Report a problem with entry 52: Desaturation after head-down tilt during laparoscopy

Part 3053 / 87

Bradycardia or asystole at the start of insufflation: the mechanism

Bradycardia or asystole as insufflation begins is a vagal reflex from peritoneal stretch. Deflate the abdomen. Slow insufflation, lower pressure and glycopyrrolate prevent it.

Why

Sudden distension of the peritoneum sets off a reflex rise in vagal tone. This slows the heart and can stop it altogether. Because it is a reflex, it starts at the moment of stretch and eases when the stretch is reduced. That is why slower gas entry, lower pressure, an anticholinergic beforehand and opening the port all help. Caval compression is a separate effect. It reduces venous return, which lowers cardiac output and blood pressure but does not produce an abrupt vagal arrest.

The trap

Gas embolism. Gas embolism is the dramatic diagnosis people think of when the heart stops during laparoscopy, so it feels like the obvious answer. But the sources explain bradycardia and asystole at the moment of distension by a vagal reflex from the stretched peritoneum, not by gas getting into the circulation.

Evidence

Barash says peritoneal distension during insufflation can cause vagal bradyarrhythmias, even asystole. Slower insufflation, lower pressure and glycopyrrolate premedication reduce it, and the port is opened if it happens. Miller links reflex bradycardia with pneumoperitoneum to peritoneal stretch and vagal stimulation.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Heart rate drops to 30 as gas first enters the abdomen. Mechanism?

Vagal reflex from peritoneal stretch

Common misconception Sudden asystole on insufflation is gas embolism

How do you prevent that event at the start of insufflation?

Slow insufflation, lower pressure, glycopyrrolate

Report a problem with entry 53: Bradycardia or asystole at the start of insufflation: the mechanism

Part 3054 / 87

PEEP during laparoscopy and the fall in blood pressure

When PEEP lowers blood pressure, the primary mechanism is reduced venous return; falling cardiac output and pressure follow from that loss of preload.

Why

PEEP keeps intrathoracic pressure high through expiration. This narrows the gradient that returns systemic venous blood to the right atrium. Right ventricular filling falls, left ventricular filling falls a beat later, and stroke volume and arterial pressure drop. The loss of preload is greater under pneumoperitoneum and in a hypovolaemic patient. Positive pressure also raises right ventricular afterload, but the texts put the pressure fall down to lost preload. Reduced cardiac output is the result, not the underlying mechanism.

The trap

Cardiac output does fall, so this feels right, but it describes the result, not the mechanism. The question asks why output and pressure fell. Raised intrathoracic pressure cuts venous return and cardiac filling first, and the drop in output follows from that.

Evidence

The texts agree that PEEP and positive pressure ventilation raise intrathoracic pressure, which reduces venous return, cardiac filling and therefore cardiac output. With pneumoperitoneum this lowers preload and cardiac index, most of all in hypovolaemia. Right ventricular afterload also rises.

Sources: Stoelting 8eMiller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Adding PEEP 10 during laparoscopy drops the blood pressure. Primary mechanism?

Reduced venous return

Is falling cardiac output the mechanism or the result of the PEEP-induced hypotension?

The result; lost preload comes first

Common misconception Reduced cardiac output is the mechanism

Report a problem with entry 54: PEEP during laparoscopy and the fall in blood pressure

Part 3055 / 87

Oliguria during laparoscopy

During pneumoperitoneum, attribute intraoperative oliguria to raised abdominal pressure and antidiuretic hormone (vasopressin) release, not hypovolaemia. It is temporary and often followed by postoperative diuresis.

Why

Insufflated gas raises intra-abdominal and perirenal pressure. This squeezes the renal parenchyma and renal vein and increases renal vascular resistance. Renal perfusion falls, which releases renin, aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone, also called vasopressin. Free water is retained and urine flow drops even in a well-filled patient. Miller and Barash both describe this. Barash's teaching that oliguria in recovery usually reflects hypovolaemia still applies in recovery. During pneumoperitoneum, however, the pressure–hormone effect explains a low output despite adequate hydration. The effect is temporary.

The trap

Hypovolaemia. Hypovolaemia is the reflex explanation, and Barash does link oliguria in recovery mainly to low volume. During pneumoperitoneum, though, urine output falls even with adequate filling, because pressure compresses the kidneys and drives antidiuretic hormone release. A low output here does not by itself mean an underfilled circulation.

Evidence

Miller says intraoperative oliguria can occur despite adequate hydration. Perirenal gas pressure raises renal vascular resistance and triggers aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone release, with diuresis afterwards. Barash links vasopressin release to raised abdominal pressure. It gives hypovolaemia as the usual cause of oliguria in recovery.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A well-hydrated woman passes almost no urine during laparoscopic surgery. Cause?

Raised abdominal pressure and antidiuretic hormone release

Common misconception Intraoperative oliguria means hypovolaemia

Is that oliguria permanent?

No; it is temporary, often with later diuresis

Report a problem with entry 55: Oliguria during laparoscopy

Part 3056 / 87

Tachycardia minutes after a desflurane step-up at the start of laparoscopy

Tachycardia within minutes of a rapid desflurane step-up is a sympathetic surge caused by the agent itself. Hypercarbia from insufflated CO2 comes on later.

Why

Raising the inspired concentration of desflurane quickly, especially beyond 5–6%, sets off a burst of sympathetic outflow. Adrenaline, noradrenaline and vasopressin are released, so heart rate and blood pressure rise sharply. The circulatory surge is brief, about 4 to 5 minutes, while the hormonal rise lasts longer. Absorbed CO2 from a pneumoperitoneum can also cause tachycardia and dysrhythmias, but hypercarbia takes 15 to 30 minutes to build. It therefore does not explain a sudden rise in heart rate minutes after the vaporiser was turned up.

The trap

Hypercarbia from CO2. Laparoscopy is starting, and CO2 is known to cause tachycardia and arrhythmias, which is worrying with a long QT. But hypercarbia builds slowly, over many minutes, and the timing here follows the desflurane increase rather than any gas absorption.

Evidence

Sudden increases in desflurane, particularly above 5–6% inspired, cause hypertension and tachycardia through sympathetic activation, lasting about 4 to 5 minutes. Insufflated CO2 causes hypercarbia, with tachycardia and dysrhythmias, only after 15 to 30 minutes.

Sources: Barash 9eMayo reviewMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Two minutes after desflurane is turned rapidly to 8%, heart rate jumps. Cause?

Sympathetic surge from desflurane itself

Common misconception The insufflated CO2 caused the sudden tachycardia

How long does CO2 absorption take to cause hypercarbia after insufflation?

15 to 30 minutes

Report a problem with entry 56: Tachycardia minutes after a desflurane step-up at the start of laparoscopy

Back to card 12Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsTemperature

  1. 057Heat loss from carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopy
  2. 058Heat loss under anaesthesia: radiation and convection far exceed evaporation and conduction
  3. 059Phases of intraoperative hypothermia: redistribution in the first hour, then slower loss, then a plateau
  4. 060Preventing hypothermia: forced-air warming
  5. 061Consequences of mild perioperative hypothermia
  6. 062Postoperative shivering: the drugs that stop it
Part 3057 / 87

Heat loss from carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopy

Count heat lost through CO2 insufflation as convection: cold, dry gas moves over exposed peritoneal contents and carries heat away from the patient.

Why

Convection is heat carried off by a moving fluid as it passes over a warmer surface. In a pneumoperitoneum, gas enters cold from the supply and flows across the large, moist peritoneal surface. It picks up heat, then escapes through ports and leaks, and fresh cold gas replaces it. Colder, drier gas is thought to increase this loss, and long operations add to it. That is why inline warmers and humidifiers exist, although warmed, humidified gas has not been shown to beat cold, dry gas.

The trap

Evaporation heat loss. Evaporation seems the obvious route, since dry insufflated gas meets moist peritoneum. However, the textbook classifies heat loss during insufflation as convective: cold gas flows over warm viscera and carries heat away, rather than water turning to vapour.

Evidence

Hypothermia in laparoscopic surgery comes partly from long operating times and from insufflating cold CO2. Convective loss is thought to be worse when abdominal contents meet cold, dry gas. Warmed, humidified insufflation has not been shown to be superior.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
By which mechanism does cold insufflated CO2 remove heat from the patient?

Convection

Common misconception Evaporation is the main route

Has warmed, humidified insufflation gas been shown superior to cold, dry gas?

No

Report a problem with entry 57: Heat loss from carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopy

Part 3058 / 87

Heat loss under anaesthesia: radiation and convection far exceed evaporation and conduction

After the first-hour redistribution drop, the anaesthetised patient loses most heat by radiation and convection. Evaporation and conduction contribute little.

Why

Anaesthetic agents vasodilate, so core heat first spreads to the cooler periphery. After that, the skin keeps giving heat to a colder theatre. Radiation is infrared emission to surfaces the patient does not touch. Convection is heat carried away by air moving over exposed skin. Both act across the whole body surface. Conduction needs direct contact, and only a small area touches the table. Evaporation plays a minor part. Net loss exceeds metabolic production for several hours, so a longer operation means more heat lost.

The trap

Conduction from table. The patient lies on a cold table, so contact seems an obvious route, and radiation is correct, which makes the pair look right. But conduction acts only through the small contact area. Air flowing over large exposed surfaces (convection) removes far more heat. Contact loss is conduction, not convection.

Evidence

Anaesthetic vasodilation redistributes heat, dropping core temperature 1.0–1.5°C in the first hour. Skin loss, mostly radiant and convective, continues for 2–3 hours. Conduction means contact; convection means moving air. In infants these two routes cause about 75% of loss.

Sources: FaustBarash 9eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After the first hour, which two routes account for most heat loss in the anaesthetised patient?

Infrared emission and air moving over the skin

Why does lying on a cold table contribute little heat loss?

Conduction acts only through the small contact area

Common misconception Conduction to the table is a major route

Report a problem with entry 58: Heat loss under anaesthesia: radiation and convection far exceed evaporation and conduction

Part 3059 / 87

Phases of intraoperative hypothermia: redistribution in the first hour, then slower loss, then a plateau

An early fall in the first hour means core-to-periphery redistribution. Core temperature reaches a plateau at 3 to 5 hours, when heat production matches heat loss.

Why

Nearly every anaesthetic dilates vessels, so warm core blood moves into the cooler limbs. Core temperature therefore drops quickly, even though the heat is still inside the body. After that the fall slows, because the body is now really losing heat through the skin, mostly by radiation and convection, faster than metabolism makes it. In the end loss and metabolic production balance out. Core temperature then levels off in a thermal steady state, an equilibrium rather than continued cooling.

The trap

Conduction heat loss. Heat does pass to the table by conduction, so this option sounds plausible. But conduction adds little compared with radiation and convection, and skin losses only take over after the first hour. A fall inside the first hour comes from heat moving within the body, not from contact surfaces.

Evidence

Vasodilating anaesthetics drop core temperature 1.0°C to 1.5°C in the first hour as heat redistributes. The decline is gentler over the next 2 to 3 hours as skin losses exceed metabolism. After 3 to 5 hours it plateaus, with loss matching production.

Sources: Faust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Core temperature falls 1.2 degrees C in the first hour of anaesthesia. Mechanism?

Core-to-periphery redistribution of heat

Common misconception Contact with the table drives the first-hour fall

Why does core temperature plateau after 3 to 5 hours?

Heat loss equals heat production

Report a problem with entry 59: Phases of intraoperative hypothermia: redistribution in the first hour, then slower loss, then a plateau

Part 3060 / 87

Preventing hypothermia: forced-air warming

If asked for the single best way to prevent hypothermia during anaesthesia, choose active forced-air skin warming. Room and fluid warming only add to it.

Why

Active warming through the skin is the central measure. Faust ranks forced-air convective warming, with resistive carbon-fibre blankets, as the most effective way to conserve heat. Stoelting says it gives the best mix of efficacy, safety and cost. Miller lists room warming and fluid warmers alongside forced air as good prevention. That fits once they are treated as add-ons, because Stoelting reserves fluid warming mainly for large-volume resuscitation. For laparoscopy, Barash adds that forced-air warming also helps prevent surgical site infection.

The trap

Intravenous fluid warming. Fluid warmers appear in every warming list, so they can look like the main measure. The books point them mainly at large-volume resuscitation. A routine laparoscopic sleeve in a healthy adult does not need that, but it does need active skin warming, which is ranked most effective.

Evidence

Faust names forced-air convective or resistive blanket warming as the most effective heat-conservation techniques. Stoelting calls skin warming key and forced air the best balance of efficacy, safety and price. Barash says it prevents hypothermia in laparoscopy. Miller lists room and fluid warming alongside it.

Sources: FaustStoelting 8eBarash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Theatre is cold and a 3-hour bariatric case begins. Which one measure best keeps the core warm?

A warm-air blanket over the skin

When is fluid warming mainly reserved?

Large-volume resuscitation

Common misconception Warm intravenous fluid is the main measure

Report a problem with entry 60: Preventing hypothermia: forced-air warming

Part 3061 / 87

Consequences of mild perioperative hypothermia

Treat even mild perioperative hypothermia as harmful. It drives catecholamine release, wound infection, bleeding and cardiac events, and it lengthens recovery and hospital stay.

Why

Cooling sets off a sympathetic stress response. Catecholamines raise vascular resistance, blood pressure and heart rate, so the heart works harder and becomes prone to ischaemia. Cold also slows platelets, clotting enzymes and drug metabolism. That causes more bleeding and transfusion, longer neuromuscular block and slower waking. Infections also become more common. Each of these problems delays recovery, so patients stay in hospital longer. Mild hypothermia gives no protection during routine surgery.

The trap

Sympathetic shutdown. Cold seems to slow everything down, so a sympathetic shutdown sounds plausible. In fact cooling triggers stress-hormone and catecholamine release. This raises vascular resistance, pressure and heart rate, and it is part of why myocardial ischaemia occurs.

Evidence

Randomised trials show that even mild hypothermia increases cardiac complications, wound infection, coagulopathy, transfusion, recovery time and hospital stay. Another text reports up to a threefold rise in infection, along with stress-hormone and catecholamine release. Platelet, clotting-factor and drug-metabolism function are all depressed.

Sources: Stoelting 8eFaustMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What happens to catecholamines in mild perioperative hypothermia?

They rise, increasing cardiac workload

Common misconception Cold causes adrenergic shutdown

Name three harms of mild perioperative hypothermia.

Wound infection, bleeding and cardiac events

Report a problem with entry 61: Consequences of mild perioperative hypothermia

Part 3062 / 87

Postoperative shivering: the drugs that stop it

Give pethidine first for postoperative shivering; clonidine and other opioids also work. Rewarm the hypothermic patient; when normothermic, treat with the drug.

Why

Shivering mostly answers a fall in core temperature, yet it also follows anaesthesia in normothermic patients, where kappa-opioid, NMDA and serotonin receptor actions are implicated; opioids, clonidine, ondansetron and ketamine suppress it, and pethidine is the usual choice. Miller reserves forced-air warming for the hypothermic patient, while Mayo pairs rewarming with pethidine; these fit together: warm the cold patient, give the drug to the warm one. Axillary probes read below core, so a normal axillary value signals normothermia.

The trap

Midazolam as a sedative for shivering. A sedative seems the way to calm a trembling patient. No reference text lists a benzodiazepine against shivering; Barash notes midazolam, unlike propofol, leaves thermoregulatory thresholds unchanged, and one trial found it alone barely altered post-spinal shivering, 50% against 60%. Network meta-analyses rank nefopam, tramadol, pethidine and clonidine top.

Evidence

Opioids, clonidine, ondansetron and ketamine each prevent or treat shivering, with pethidine 12.5–25 mg IV the commonest adult choice. Forced-air warming is for hypothermia, and axillary readings underestimate core. Morphine rests only on the general opioid statement; lornoxicam appears in no source.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A normothermic 45-year-old shivers in recovery after general anaesthesia, axillary temperature normal. Which drug is usually given first?

Pethidine; clonidine and other opioids also work.

Which is the odd one out for treating postoperative shivering: pethidine, clonidine, ondansetron, midazolam?

The odd one out · Midazolam; benzodiazepines are not listed and leave thermoregulatory thresholds unchanged.

Common misconception That a sedative such as a benzodiazepine settles shivering

Report a problem with entry 62: Postoperative shivering: the drugs that stop it

Back to card 13Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsNausea in recovery

  1. 063Rescue antiemetic after failed prophylaxis: a drug from a different class
  2. 064Nausea and vomiting that persist after ambulatory surgery
  3. 065Nausea in Parkinson's disease: the antiemetic to choose
Part 3063 / 87

Rescue antiemetic after failed prophylaxis: a drug from a different class

When prophylaxis fails, rescue with an antiemetic from a class not yet given; repeating a same-class drug within 6 hours adds nothing.

Why

Each prophylactic drug has already occupied the receptor it targets. If nausea breaks through, a bigger dose of the same class has nothing new to block, so evidence shows a same-class redose within 6 hours is no better than placebo. A drug from an untouched class, such as a nonselective antihistamine like promethazine, adds a new mechanism. Once a short-acting drug has worn off after 6 hours, a second 5-HT3 antagonist or butyrophenone dose may be considered, but only if nothing else is available.

The trap

Repeat ondansetron. Ondansetron is the familiar first-line antiemetic, so topping it up feels safe and logical. In recovery, the dose was given only hours earlier. A same-class repeat within 6 hours works no better than placebo. Repeating metoclopramide fails for the same reason. Promethazine is the only option from a new class.

Evidence

Guidance says failed prophylaxis should be treated with a different class. A same-class redose within 6 hours performs like placebo. A second 5-HT3 dose is kept for beyond 6 hours, when no alternative exists. Promethazine rescues effectively but sedates.

Sources: Outside our books: Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (2020)Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
A woman given ondansetron 2 hours ago vomits in recovery. Rescue antiemetic?

One from a class not yet given

Why not repeat the same class within 6 hours?

It works no better than placebo

Common misconception Topping up ondansetron helps

Report a problem with entry 63: Rescue antiemetic after failed prophylaxis: a drug from a different class

Part 3064 / 87

Nausea and vomiting that persist after ambulatory surgery

Exclude sinister causes first, then give 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid or IM ephedrine 0.5 mg/kg; never repeat a used antiemetic within 6 hours.

Why

If vomiting continues after rescue therapy, it may not be simple PONV. Miller says to rule out serious causes before treating the symptoms. After that, Miller supports two measures that work together. An isotonic fluid bolus restores circulating volume and reduces nausea and dizziness. Intramuscular ephedrine works about as well as droperidol and is less sedating than placebo. Giving the same antiemetic again within the stated interval adds no benefit. If first-line management fails, choose a different second-line drug.

The trap

Insufficient volume bolus. It names the fluid type Miller recommends after ambulatory surgery, so it looks right at a glance. But the volume is only half of the studied bolus. The reduction in nausea and dizziness was shown with 20 mL/kg.

Evidence

Miller advises excluding serious causes before symptomatic relief. A 20 mL/kg isotonic electrolyte bolus reduces nausea and dizziness after day-case surgery. Intramuscular ephedrine 0.5 mg/kg prevents and treats symptoms about as well as droperidol. Repeating a used antiemetic within 6 hours has no value.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Vomiting continues after rescue therapy on the day unit. What do you do before more symptomatic treatment?

Exclude serious causes

What isotonic fluid volume relieves nausea and dizziness after day surgery?

20 mL/kg

Common misconception 10 mL/kg is the studied bolus

Report a problem with entry 64: Nausea and vomiting that persist after ambulatory surgery

Part 3065 / 87

Nausea in Parkinson's disease: the antiemetic to choose

In Parkinson's disease, never give a centrally acting dopamine antagonist for nausea. Use ondansetron, or domperidone where available, because neither blocks brain dopamine receptors.

Why

Parkinson's disease is a loss of dopamine in the extrapyramidal motor pathways. Any antiemetic that blocks central dopamine receptors lowers dopaminergic tone further. That worsens rigidity and slowness and can cause extrapyramidal reactions. This covers haloperidol, droperidol, the phenothiazines including promethazine, and metoclopramide. Ondansetron blocks serotonin receptors instead and spares the dopamine pathways. The UK tutorial names domperidone first because it stays outside the blood–brain barrier. Domperidone is given only by mouth or rectum, so ondansetron is the usual intravenous choice and is the preferred drug in the American review.

The trap

Promethazine as antihistamine. Antihistamine antiemetics such as cyclizine are safe in Parkinson's disease, so promethazine looks like a harmless antihistamine. It is actually a phenothiazine that also blocks dopamine receptors. That means it can cause extrapyramidal effects and is listed as contraindicated.

Evidence

The Mayo review lists droperidol, promethazine and metoclopramide as contraindicated and names ondansetron the preferred antiemetic. Faust rules out all antidopaminergic drugs. The ATOTW tutorial chooses domperidone because it does not enter the brain, and also allows serotonin antagonists.

Sources: Mayo reviewOutside our books: Parkinson's Disease (2026)Faust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Retching after a knee arthroplasty, a 74-year-old on levodopa needs an IV drug. Which?

Ondansetron

Why is promethazine unsafe in Parkinson's disease?

It is a phenothiazine that blocks central dopamine receptors

Common misconception Promethazine is just a harmless antihistamine

Report a problem with entry 65: Nausea in Parkinson's disease: the antiemetic to choose

Back to card 14Back to contents

Part 3 · SituationsAfter surgery: the common problems

  1. 066Postoperative delirium: risk factors
  2. 067Reducing postoperative delirium in an elderly patient with dementia
  3. 068Agitation after surgery in a daily drinker two days without alcohol
  4. 069Commonest reason for hypoxaemia during the first postoperative day
  5. 070Low urine output after a long bariatric operation despite fluids
  6. 071Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors
Part 3066 / 87

Postoperative delirium: risk factors

Delirium risk rises with age over 65, cognitive impairment, hearing or visual loss, ASA III or worse, low albumin, dehydration, sleep deprivation and immobilisation.

Why

Delirium appears when a vulnerable brain meets a perioperative insult. Predisposing traits belong to the patient: older age, pre-existing cognitive impairment or dementia, impaired hearing or sight, frailty, and a heavy illness burden, which shows up as a poor ASA grade or a low serum albumin. Precipitating insults come from the episode: surgery and anaesthesia, pain, lost sleep, enforced immobility, hypoxia, dehydration, metabolic derangement, opioids and anticholinergics. Keeping patients mobile, rested, hydrated and able to see and hear removes precipitants; mobility and a normal albumin sit at the safe end.

The trap

ASA three excluded. ASA 3 sounds like a general fitness grade, not something specific to delirium, so people pick it as the exception. But ASA III or worse is one of the main listed risk factors. Raised albumin is the false item, because low albumin is what predisposes to delirium.

Evidence

The textbooks list patient factors: older age, cognitive impairment or dementia, hearing or visual loss, severe comorbidity, ASA III or higher, hypoalbuminaemia, dehydration and frailty. They also list perioperative triggers: pain, sleep deprivation, immobilisation, hypoxia, opioids and anticholinergic drugs.

Sources: Stoelting 8eFaustMiller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Name four patient factors that predispose an older surgical patient to delirium.

Age over 65, cognitive impairment, sensory loss, low albumin

Which is NOT a delirium risk factor: ASA III, dehydration, raised albumin, sleep deprivation?

The odd one out · Raised albumin

Common misconception ASA grade is unrelated to delirium

Report a problem with entry 66: Postoperative delirium: risk factors

Part 3067 / 87

Reducing postoperative delirium in an elderly patient with dementia

In frail elderly patients at high delirium risk, titrate anaesthetic to processed EEG and avoid burst suppression. Depth matters more than technique.

Why

EEG-guided dosing trials give inconsistent results. The large ENGAGES trial found no fall in delirium, partly because anaesthetic dose barely differed between groups. Even so, Miller notes that severe EEG suppression, especially burst suppression, is consistently linked with delirium, and the ESAIC guideline still suggests EEG-guided depth. These views fit if EEG guards against overdosing rather than proving benefit. Barash advises avoiding deep anaesthesia in high-risk patients; Miller advises smaller induction and maintenance doses. No technique is superior: benefit comes from avoiding harm, not the agent chosen.

The trap

Total intravenous anaesthesia as prevention. Total intravenous anaesthesia sounds gentler on the brain and avoids volatile agents, so it looks like a delirium-prevention strategy. But no anaesthetic technique has been shown to beat another at preventing postoperative delirium. What matters is avoiding excessive depth, whichever drugs produce it.

Evidence

Barash recommends avoiding deep anaesthesia in high-risk patients but says the evidence is inconsistent, and that no technique is proven superior. Miller links burst suppression consistently with delirium. He suggests monitoring depth with EEG and giving smaller induction and maintenance doses.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
An 84-year-old with dementia is having hip fixation. Which intraoperative measure most plausibly lowers delirium risk: processed EEG titration, avoiding burst suppression, or a particular agent?

Titrate to processed EEG and avoid burst suppression; depth matters, not the agent.

For a frail 79-year-old at high delirium risk, a registrar chooses total intravenous anaesthesia to protect the brain. Is this technique shown to be better?

No; no technique beats another. Avoiding excessive depth is what matters.

Common misconception That total intravenous anaesthesia prevents postoperative delirium better than volatile agents

Report a problem with entry 67: Reducing postoperative delirium in an elderly patient with dementia

Part 3068 / 87

Agitation after surgery in a daily drinker two days without alcohol

Treat agitation with tachycardia 24+ hours after a daily drinker's last drink as alcohol withdrawal; give small, titrated benzodiazepine doses first-line.

Why

In a regular drinker, stopping alcohol can bring on withdrawal within a day. Withdrawal shows as agitation, a surge of sympathetic activity and a risk of seizures. Benzodiazepines mainly prevent withdrawal seizures and also calm the sympathetic overdrive. Choose the drug by cause. The European delirium guideline advises against benzodiazepines for ordinary postoperative delirium, but it makes an exception for alcohol-withdrawal delirium, where they are first-line. Miller agrees that benzodiazepines suit only the withdrawal form. So once the alcohol history points to withdrawal, the drug choice is settled.

The trap

Haloperidol for withdrawal. Haloperidol is the familiar drug for agitated postoperative delirium, so it looks like the natural choice for a combative patient. Here, though, the cause is alcohol withdrawal. Haloperidol does nothing against the seizure risk or the sympathetic surge that benzodiazepines treat, and the guidelines make benzodiazepines first-line for this form.

Evidence

Withdrawal can start 24 hours after the last drink. Benzodiazepines prevent withdrawal seizures and reduce sympathetic overactivity. They are first-line, in small titrated doses, for delirium caused by alcohol withdrawal, but they are not indicated for other forms of delirium.

Sources: Outside our books: Update of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium in adult patients (2024)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Two days after a laparotomy, a man who drinks daily is agitated, sweaty and tachycardic. First-line drug?

Small, titrated benzodiazepine doses

Common misconception Haloperidol is first-line for this agitation

How soon after the last drink can alcohol withdrawal begin?

Within about 24 hours

Report a problem with entry 68: Agitation after surgery in a daily drinker two days without alcohol

Part 3069 / 87

Commonest reason for hypoxaemia during the first postoperative day

After cervical cord injury or cervical spine fixation, first-day hypoxaemia is most often atelectasis: the lost cough leaves secretions retained, collapsing lung units.

Why

When the diaphragm is spared, tidal breathing may be adequate. Forced expiration, however, depends on intercostal and abdominal muscles, and these are denervated below a cervical lesion. Without them, expiratory reserve falls, the chest wall moves paradoxically, vital capacity drops sharply and there is no forceful cough. Secretions pool in the small airways and the alveoli beyond them collapse. The resulting shunt causes hypoxaemia within hours. If the secretions are not cleared, they later seed pneumonia, which can then tip the patient into respiratory failure.

The trap

Thromboembolism. Paralysed, immobile patients carry a real thromboembolic risk, so embolism feels like the textbook answer. But on the first day the dominant problem is mechanical. The cough is gone, secretions are retained and the dependent lung collapses. That shunt, not a clot, explains the early desaturation.

Evidence

Barash states that loss of abdominal and intercostal support makes breathing paradoxical, cuts vital capacity by about 60%, and that inability to cough and clear secretions causes atelectasis. Stoelting attributes impaired cough to reduced expiratory reserve, and later pneumonia to retained secretions.

Sources: Barash 9eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
The day after cervical spine fixation for cord injury, a man desaturates with a weak cough. Commonest cause?

Atelectasis from retained secretions

Common misconception First-day hypoxaemia is pulmonary embolism

Why can a patient with a cervical cord lesion not cough effectively?

Intercostal and abdominal expiratory muscles are denervated

Report a problem with entry 69: Commonest reason for hypoxaemia during the first postoperative day

Part 3070 / 87

Low urine output after a long bariatric operation despite fluids

Postoperative oliguria is usually hypovolaemia. After a long bariatric operation where oliguria continues despite fluid, suspect rhabdomyolysis and keep hydrating.

Why

Miller's oliguria chapter names intravascular depletion as the usual postoperative cause, so fluid comes first. Its obesity text and Barash add a condition: muscle breakdown is common after bariatric surgery (22.7% in one laparoscopic series), with risk rising with BMI and operating time, and higher with laparoscopy and long cases. Myoglobin released forms haem casts that block the tubules, so urine can stay low after volume replacement. Here, oliguria unresponsive to an adequate fluid challenge points to rhabdomyolysis, and hydration remains the treatment.

The trap

Hypovolaemia. Hypovolaemia is the commonest textbook cause of early postoperative oliguria, and long bariatric cases need generous fluid. But this patient received several litres plus a further challenge, with little blood loss, and still makes little urine. Non-response in a heavy patient after long surgery signals muscle breakdown.

Evidence

Miller's reports volume depletion as the commonest cause of early postoperative oliguria, and rhabdomyolysis in 22.7% of laparoscopic bariatric patients, linked to BMI and operative duration. Barash agrees it is commoner with laparoscopy and long cases. Haem casts block tubules; aggressive hydration is the mainstay.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Usual cause of oliguria early after surgery?

Hypovolaemia

After a 6-hour laparoscopic bypass in a BMI 55 patient, urine stays low despite a further fluid challenge. Suspect?

Rhabdomyolysis; keep hydrating

Common misconception Persistent oliguria here is still simple hypovolaemia

Report a problem with entry 70: Low urine output after a long bariatric operation despite fluids

Part 3071 / 87

Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors

Retention risk rises with male sex, older age, long operations, joint replacement or perineal surgery, generous fluids, and neuraxial local anaesthetic or opioid.

Why

Emptying the bladder needs two things: a detrusor that contracts and the feeling of a full bladder. A spinal anaesthetic blocks the S2-S4 segments. This weakens the detrusor and removes the urge to void until sensation returns, while fluids keep filling the bladder. Long operations and large fluid volumes add to the load. Neuraxial opioids and anticholinergic or adrenergic drugs make emptying harder still. Older patients are vulnerable even to modest spinal bupivacaine doses above 7 mg.

The trap

Female sex. Being female is a well-established risk for PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting), so it appears in nearly every list of risk factors. Urinary retention runs the other way: the sources name male sex as the risk.

Evidence

Miller lists male sex, length of surgery, fluid volume, neurological disease, perineal surgery, anticholinergic, beta-blocking or adrenergic drugs, and neuraxial drugs. It adds older patients given more than 7 mg spinal bupivacaine. A review adds age over 50 and joint replacement.

Sources: Miller 10eMayo review

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Name four risk factors for urinary retention after surgery.

Male sex, older age, long surgery, neuraxial drugs

Which sex carries higher risk of postoperative urinary retention?

Male

Common misconception Female sex raises retention risk

Report a problem with entry 71: Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors

Back to card 15Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsClots, cement and hip fracture

  1. 072Venous thromboembolism after orthopaedic surgery: the highest-risk operations and the size of the risk
  2. 073Where regional anaesthesia lowers deep vein thrombosis most
  3. 074Thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery: the agent
  4. 075Bone cement implantation syndrome: the highest-risk procedures
  5. 076Bone cement implantation syndrome: the presentation
  6. 077Reducing embolism when cementing a femoral prosthesis
  7. 078Living kidney donor: the leading cause of perioperative death
  8. 079Hip fracture repair: mortality and what drives it
Part 4072 / 87

Venous thromboembolism after orthopaedic surgery: the highest-risk operations and the size of the risk

Hip replacement, knee replacement and hip fracture surgery share the top band: DVT 40% to 80% unprophylaxed. Forced single DVT pick: knee replacement.

Why

Barash and Stoelting put these three operations in one high-risk group and do not rank them. Any ranking comes from outside the textbooks. Geerts, reporting the ACCP guideline and the only source for this, gives untreated venographic DVT of 41% to 85% after knee arthroplasty against 42% to 57% after hip, so knee edges ahead for DVT. Falck-Ytter's ACCP chapter picks out hip replacement and hip fracture surgery for overall VTE risk. That is a leaning, not a ranking. Confidence in a single winner is low.

The trap

Hip arthroplasty. Hip surgery is the classic high-risk orthopaedic operation, and one outside source picks it out for overall VTE risk, so it feels like the winner. For DVT itself, the only source that ranks gives knee arthroplasty the wider and higher untreated range.

Evidence

Barash gives untreated DVT of 40% to 80% in orthopaedic patients; Stoelting lists knee or hip replacement and hip fracture as high-risk procedures. Outside sources: Geerts reports 41% to 85% after knee versus 42% to 57% after hip; Falck-Ytter highlights hip replacement and hip fracture.

Sources: Outside our books: The ACCP Guidelines for Thromboprophylaxis in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty (2012)Barash 9eOutside our books: Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2012)Stoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Untreated DVT rate after hip or knee replacement or hip fracture surgery?

40% to 80%

Which three orthopaedic operations share the top band for venous thromboembolism?

Hip replacement, knee replacement and hip fracture surgery

Report a problem with entry 72: Venous thromboembolism after orthopaedic surgery: the highest-risk operations and the size of the risk

Part 4073 / 87

Where regional anaesthesia lowers deep vein thrombosis most

For the joint where regional anaesthesia most cuts DVT, choose hip replacement: every source includes hip; knee shares the benefit but never outranks it.

Why

Two views fit together. Miller's arthroplasty section names hip replacement specifically, though it calls the finding disputed. Hip surgery carries a particular clot stimulus: dislocation and femoral reaming kink the femoral vein, causing stasis. Barash's large database study found fewer thromboembolic events with neuraxial techniques after both hip and knee replacement, without ranking them. Miller's neuraxial chapter calls the overall effect uncertain. So hip is correct under either reading, while knee is correct only under the broader one.

The trap

Knee replacement. Knee replacement carries a heavy clot burden, and the same database evidence covers it, so it looks equally strong. But no source shows a larger regional benefit at the knee, and only the hip is singled out. Knee is right under one reading only.

Evidence

Miller links spinal or epidural anaesthesia for hip replacement to fewer venous thromboses, while noting that this is disputed. Barash reports fewer thromboembolic events with neuraxial techniques in both hip and knee replacement. Elsewhere, Miller calls the overall effect uncertain.

Sources: Miller 10eBarash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
For which joint replacement is regional anaesthesia singled out as reducing DVT?

Hip replacement

Common misconception The knee benefits more than the hip

What mechanical factor in hip surgery promotes femoral vein stasis?

Dislocation and reaming kink the femoral vein

Report a problem with entry 73: Where regional anaesthesia lowers deep vein thrombosis most

Part 4074 / 87

Thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery: the agent

Give 10–14 days of prophylaxis after hip or knee replacement or hip fracture: LMWH preferred; ACCP accepts aspirin; Stoelting limits aspirin alone to low risk.

Why

Several drugs prevent clot after major orthopaedic surgery, which is why reference lists name many. The ACCP guideline ranks LMWH first: it prevents clot as well as or better than rivals, bleeds little and has the longest track record, so newer drugs are tested against it; fondaparinux, warfarin and aspirin rank below it as alternatives. Stoelting accepts a DOAC alongside LMWH and adds the risk branch: aspirin alone is inadequate for joint replacement or hip fracture, acceptable only for low-risk surgery such as below the knee.

The trap

Aspirin monotherapy. Aspirin. It is a valid choice: the ACCP guideline lists it at Grade 1B after hip or knee replacement and hip fracture surgery, and NICE uses it after a course of LMWH. But it is not the preferred first choice, and Stoelting still limits aspirin alone to low-risk surgery.

Evidence

Stoelting allows LMWH or a DOAC for knee or hip replacement, trauma and hip fracture, and restricts aspirin monotherapy to low-risk cases. The ACCP guideline prefers LMWH for its efficacy, low bleeding and long experience, ranking other agents as alternatives.

Sources: Outside our books: Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2012)Outside our books: Thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedics: an update (2018)Stoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Preferred thromboprophylaxis agent after hip fracture surgery, and for how long?

Low-molecular-weight heparin for 10 to 14 days

Common misconception Aspirin is the preferred first choice

In Stoelting's view, when is aspirin alone adequate thromboprophylaxis?

Only for low-risk surgery, not joint replacement or hip fracture

Report a problem with entry 74: Thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery: the agent

Part 4075 / 87

Bone cement implantation syndrome: the highest-risk procedures

Expect the worst cement reaction with a cemented long-stem femoral prosthesis, especially for pathological fracture, a large cement load or existing pulmonary hypertension.

Why

Forcing cement into the femoral canal raises intramedullary pressure to as much as 680 mm Hg, versus under 100 mm Hg without cement. This pushes marrow and debris into the venous system and on to the lungs, raising pulmonary vascular resistance and straining the right ventricle, which can cause hypotension, hypoxia or arrest. A long stem and a large volume of cement are both recognised hazards. A previously cemented canal is smoother and less permeable, lowering the risk somewhat but not removing these hazards.

The trap

Primary hip replacement. It is tempting because a primary hip has a femoral canal that has never been instrumented, and that is a listed risk factor. But a short stem uses less cement. A long cemented stem for a fracture carries more hazards: the long stem, the fracture and the cement load.

Evidence

The risk factors for cement implantation syndrome are metastatic disease, a never-instrumented canal, a long stem, hip arthroplasty for pathological fracture, pulmonary hypertension with right ventricular failure, and a large amount of cement. High cementing pressure is thought to drive the embolisation.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which hip procedure carries the highest bone cement reaction risk?

Cemented long-stem femoral prosthesis, especially for pathological fracture

Common misconception A short cemented primary stem is highest risk

Why does a previously cemented femoral canal carry somewhat less risk?

It is smoother and less permeable

Report a problem with entry 75: Bone cement implantation syndrome: the highest-risk procedures

Part 4076 / 87

Bone cement implantation syndrome: the presentation

Bone cement implantation syndrome presents at cementation with hypoxaemia and hypotension as its hallmarks. Expect oxygenation and blood pressure to fall, not rise.

Why

Pushing cement under pressure into the medullary canal forces marrow fat and debris into the pulmonary circulation. The emboli, and the inflammatory cascade they set off, raise pulmonary vascular resistance. Oxygenation then fails, and the strained right ventricle cannot maintain output, causing hypotension, arrhythmia and, at worst, arrest. Toxicity from methyl methacrylate monomer was once the favoured explanation, and Miller still lists it among proposed mechanisms. Barash, however, notes that measured monomer levels are too low to explain the severity, so embolisation is now the leading explanation.

The trap

Hypercapnia. Hypercapnia seems like the natural partner of hypoxia in any respiratory crisis. But the books define this syndrome by low oxygen and low blood pressure. The problem is embolic blockage of pulmonary vessels, not failed ventilation, and the books do not list carbon dioxide retention as a feature.

Evidence

Barash defines the syndrome as hypoxaemia, hypotension and/or altered consciousness during cemented fracture repair or arthroplasty. Miller adds bronchospasm, arrhythmias, raised pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular failure and cardiac arrest.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
During a cemented hemiarthroplasty, what are the hallmark signs at cementation?

Hypoxaemia and hypotension

Common misconception Hypercapnia is a hallmark

What is now the leading explanation for the cement reaction?

Embolisation of marrow and debris to the lungs

Report a problem with entry 76: Bone cement implantation syndrome: the presentation

Part 4077 / 87

Reducing embolism when cementing a femoral prosthesis

To reduce embolism when cementing a femoral stem, the surgeon should pulse-lavage the medullary canal and drill a distal vent hole before inserting the prosthesis.

Why

Cement and the femoral stem push marrow contents into the femoral veins as they fill the canal. Lavage washes that marrow out first, so less of it can be driven into the circulation. A vent hole gives the displaced material somewhere else to go. The load is larger when the canal has never been instrumented, because its untouched lining is more permeable, and it also rises with a long stem and a large volume of cement. Previously cemented bone becomes smooth and sclerotic and lets less through.

The trap

Femoral canal plug. A plug looks like it should block emboli, and it is a real cementing step. However, it neither clears marrow from the canal nor relieves the pressure that drives debris into the veins. The sources name lavage and venting, not plugging, as the protective measures.

Evidence

Miller says that vigorous pulsatile washing of the canal and drilling distal vent holes before the femoral stem goes in can lessen the haemodynamic effects of marrow embolism. Risk factors include an uninstrumented canal, a long stem, pre-existing pulmonary hypertension and a lot of cement.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which two surgical steps reduce marrow embolism when cementing a femoral stem?

Pulsatile canal lavage and a distal vent hole

Does a cement plug clear marrow or relieve canal pressure?

No

Common misconception A femoral plug prevents embolism

Report a problem with entry 77: Reducing embolism when cementing a femoral prosthesis

Part 4078 / 87

Living kidney donor: the leading cause of perioperative death

In a living kidney donor, pulmonary embolism is the commonest cause of perioperative death. Give mechanical and heparin thromboprophylaxis until the donor is walking.

Why

Deaths after donor nephrectomy are rare: about 3.1 per 10,000 donors within 90 days (0.03%), a rate that has not changed for 15 years. The question is therefore which complication causes those few deaths. Serious bleeding is uncommon, with transfusion needed in only 0.4%. Donors carry a moderate risk of venous thromboembolism, and pulmonary embolism, seen in 0.1%, is the main cause of death. Prevention therefore means compression devices plus prophylactic heparin, continued until the donor is mobile.

The trap

Haemorrhage. It is tempting because nephrectomy means dividing large renal vessels, so haemorrhage feels like the obvious killer. Registry data show transfusion is needed in only a small fraction of donors. Thromboembolism, not bleeding, causes most of the deaths.

Evidence

In more than 80,000 living kidney donors, 90-day mortality was 3.1 per 10,000 (0.03%) and stable over 15 years. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 0.1% and caused most deaths. Pneumatic compression and prophylactic heparin are advised until the donor is walking.

Sources: Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Commonest cause of perioperative death in a living kidney donor?

Pulmonary embolism

Common misconception Massive bleeding kills most donors

What prophylaxis should a kidney donor receive, and until when?

Compression devices and heparin until walking

Report a problem with entry 78: Living kidney donor: the leading cause of perioperative death

Part 4079 / 87

Hip fracture repair: mortality and what drives it

Name advanced age as the major predictor of death after hip fracture repair; expect in-hospital mortality in low single-digit percentages, not the one-year figure.

Why

These figures come from outside the textbooks. The Hu meta-analysis lists advanced age among strong-evidence predictors, alongside cardiac disease, dementia, high ASA grade and multimorbidity; age is the one that predicts death across every cohort, so cardiac disease is a real but lesser predictor. Mortality rises with the time window measured: Lezak's US data found 3.9% in-hospital, the ANZHFR registry report 4.5% for Australia, and Johansen's UK database analysis 6.6%; one-year deaths are several-fold higher. Within the admission, risk climbs steeply with ASA grade.

The trap

Thirty percent mortality. Thirty per cent is the mortality figure most often quoted for hip fracture, so it feels familiar. It is the cumulative one-year figure. Deaths during the admission itself are a small fraction of it, in the low single digits in modern registries.

Evidence

Evidence supports 12 mortality predictors, including advanced age and cardiac disease. Current inpatient mortality after hip fracture is 3.9%; in-hospital mortality is 4.5% in Australia and 6.6% in the 2015 UK database, ranging from 1.8% (ASA 1-2) to 16.5% (ASA 4).

Sources: Outside our books: Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2012)Outside our books: Inpatient mortality following hip fracture in the United States: an updated analysis of over one million cases (2026)Outside our books: Variation in mortality following hip fracture across the Asia Pacific region: Country/region-specific report (2024)Outside our books: Understanding mortality rates after hip fracture repair using ASA physical status in the National Hip Fracture Database (2017)Miller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Major predictor of death after hip fracture repair?

Advanced age

Roughly what share of hip fracture repair patients die before leaving hospital?

A few per cent, well under the one-year toll

Common misconception In-hospital mortality is about 30%

Report a problem with entry 79: Hip fracture repair: mortality and what drives it

Back to card 16Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsPulmonary risk and outcome

  1. 080Smoking: what it does to perioperative risk and recovery
  2. 081Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications
  3. 082Epidural analgesia and cardiac outcome after major abdominal surgery
Part 4080 / 87

Smoking: what it does to perioperative risk and recovery

Smoking harms the lungs, heart and wounds and depresses macrophage function, but smokers have less PONV. Choose reduced nausea, never enhanced macrophage function.

Why

Stoelting describes smoke causing mucus hypersecretion and poor ciliary clearance; quitting helps partly by restoring macrophage activity, so smoking weakens lung defence. Carbon monoxide cuts oxygen-carrying capacity and nicotine stimulates the heart, so ischaemia on the intraoperative ECG tracks exhaled carbon monoxide: ST depression is the expected change. Miller lists cardiac, pulmonary, stroke and wound complications in smokers. The one exception (Mayo review): smokers vomit less after surgery, so being a nonsmoker is a PONV predictor.

The trap

Smoking strengthens defences. It sounds plausible that an inhaled irritant would rally lung defences. In fact Stoelting credits part of the benefit of stopping smoking to recovery of macrophage activity. Smoking therefore depresses macrophage function and weakens defence against postoperative chest infection.

Evidence

Miller reports higher death, cardiac, pulmonary, stroke and wound-infection risk in current smokers. Stoelting ties carbon monoxide to reduced oxygen-carrying capacity and credits quitting with restored ciliary and macrophage function. The Mayo review reports less PONV in smokers. No source addresses epithelial permeability.

Sources: Mayo reviewStoelting 8eMiller 10eFaust

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which perioperative outcome is better in smokers?

Less postoperative nausea and vomiting

What does smoking do to lung macrophage function?

Depresses it

Common misconception Smoking enhances macrophage activity

Report a problem with entry 80: Smoking: what it does to perioperative risk and recovery

Part 4081 / 87

Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications

Abdominal, thoracic and other listed operations are outright PPC risk factors; any smoking and advanced age also count, though no source fixes numeric cut-offs.

Why

Risk sits in patient and procedure domains. Prediction models most often include surgical site, then chronic respiratory disease, then age. Miller's current checklist treats cigarette use as present or absent, so any current smoker qualifies. Stoelting's older text adds a dose effect: above 60 pack-years, overall risk doubles and pneumonia triples. The views agree: smoking always counts, heavier exposure more. No source sets a numeric age or low pack-year cut-off; an option built on such a figure is invented, but a listed operation cannot be argued with.

The trap

Specified pack-year count. This option is tempting because smoking is a real risk factor, and this history does count as cigarette use. It loses only because its pack-year figure is not a threshold any source sets. The only quantified cut-off is far higher, whereas abdominal surgery appears on the risk list outright.

Evidence

Miller's risk-factor box lists advanced age, ASA class 2 or more, heart failure, functional dependence, COPD, weight loss, impaired sensorium and cigarette use. It also lists abdominal and thoracic surgery. Stoelting reports that smokers above 60 pack-years carry double the complication risk.

Sources: Miller 10eStoelting 8e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Which operative sites, by themselves, put a patient at risk of chest complications after surgery?

Belly and chest operations

Does current light smoking count towards pulmonary complication risk after surgery?

Yes; any current cigarette use counts

Common misconception A specific low pack-year figure is a threshold

Report a problem with entry 81: Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications

Part 4082 / 87

Epidural analgesia and cardiac outcome after major abdominal surgery

To protect the heart after major abdominal surgery, continue a thoracic, local anaesthetic-based epidural postoperatively rather than removing it when surgery ends.

Why

Protection comes from analgesia continuing after surgery, not from the intraoperative block. A thoracic catheter blunts the surgical stress response and hypercoagulability, controls pain and shifts coronary flow favourably; lumbar catheters do not. Older pooled data in Barash found neuraxial anaesthesia reduced pneumonias but not infarctions. Miller later linked postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia to fewer infarctions. The guideline's registry data favour epidural over intravenous analgesia in open abdominal surgery. Keep the catheter running, ideally with local anaesthetic, which dampens the stress response most.

The trap

Early catheter removal. Early catheter removal seems safe because it avoids epidural hypotension, and an older meta-analysis found neuraxial anaesthesia did not reduce infarction. However, that study assessed anaesthetic technique. Cardiac benefit depends on postoperative thoracic analgesia, so removing the catheter at the end of surgery forfeits the protective period.

Evidence

Miller: postoperative thoracic, not lumbar, epidural analgesia may reduce myocardial infarction, and local anaesthetic solutions dampen the stress response most. Guideline: epidural beats intravenous analgesia for cardiopulmonary complications in open abdominal surgery (OR 0.58). Barash's older neuraxial meta-analysis: no reduction in infarction (RR 1.17).

Sources: Miller 10eAHA/ACC 2024 · §8.2Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
After major open abdominal surgery with a thoracic epidural in place, what gives the best cardiac protection?

Keep the thoracic local anaesthetic epidural running after surgery

Common misconception That taking the catheter out early is safer because it avoids epidural hypotension

In Miller's account, which postoperative epidural level may reduce myocardial infarction?

Thoracic, not lumbar

Report a problem with entry 82: Epidural analgesia and cardiac outcome after major abdominal surgery

Back to card 17Back to contents

Part 4 · Conditions and mechanismsLaparoscopy: the gas and cardiopulmonary disease

  1. 083Insufflation gas: why carbon dioxide
  2. 084Capnothorax: how it happens
  3. 085COPD and laparoscopy: what threatens the patient most
  4. 086Laparoscopy in significant cardiopulmonary disease: limiting the harm
  5. 087Gastric tube during laparoscopy: what it achieves
Part 4083 / 87

Insufflation gas: why carbon dioxide

Use carbon dioxide for pneumoperitoneum: it dissolves readily in blood, so accidental gas emboli clear quickly, and it does not support combustion. Never insufflate oxygen.

Why

Every laparoscopic insufflation gas risks entering a vessel. Carbon dioxide dissolves well in blood, and the lungs excrete it quickly, so an intravascular bubble shrinks fast and does less harm. Helium and nitrous oxide have a weaker safety profile than carbon dioxide. In the operative field, carbon dioxide also pushes out or dilutes oxidising gases and itself puts out flame, so diathermy inside the abdomen rarely starts a fire. Insufflating oxygen by mistake removes that protection, and fires have resulted.

The trap

Helium gas. Helium is tempting because it is inert and non-flammable, and it avoids the carbon dioxide absorption that loads ventilation. But it lacks carbon dioxide's high solubility in blood. If an embolus occurs, the bubble is not quickly dissolved and breathed out, so the safety profile is worse.

Evidence

Barash states carbon dioxide is safer than helium or nitrous oxide because its high blood solubility and rapid pulmonary elimination limit harm from an accidental embolus. It also displaces oxidising gases and extinguishes flame. Accidental oxygen use has caused fires.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Why is CO2 the standard insufflation gas?

High blood solubility clears emboli; it does not support combustion

Common misconception Helium is as safe as CO2

What danger follows accidental insufflation of oxygen?

Intra-abdominal fire

Report a problem with entry 83: Insufflation gas: why carbon dioxide

Part 4084 / 87

Capnothorax: how it happens

Capnothorax follows injury to the diaphragm or falciform ligament, congenital diaphragmatic channels, or extraperitoneal gas tracking. Risk is highest near the diaphragm.

Why

Pressurised CO2 escapes the peritoneum by any available path, and three routes lead to the chest. First, a breach in the diaphragm or falciform ligament, for example from a misdirected insufflation needle. Second, the diaphragm's natural openings: the aortic, oesophageal and caval hiatuses. Third, extraperitoneal gas rises into the mediastinum and spreads along the parietal pleura. Surgery at the hiatus, such as fundoplication, works directly on these openings, so the risk is greater than in operations far from the diaphragm.

The trap

Anterior wall dissection. Anterior wall dissection seems riskier because it feels more invasive. But gas that escapes outside the peritoneum, including into the retroperitoneum, is the gas that rises into the mediastinum and pleura. No source gives the anterior abdomen any special route to the chest.

Evidence

The pleura can be reached through trauma to the diaphragm or falciform ligament, or through natural diaphragmatic openings. Risk rises during operations near the diaphragm, such as Nissen fundoplication. CO2 that leaves the peritoneum passes into the mediastinum and then spreads along the parietal pleura.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Name three routes by which insufflated CO2 reaches the pleura.

Diaphragmatic injury, natural hiatuses, extraperitoneal tracking via mediastinum

Which laparoscopic operation carries the highest capnothorax risk?

Surgery near the diaphragm, such as fundoplication

Common misconception Anterior abdominal dissection raises the risk

Report a problem with entry 84: Capnothorax: how it happens

Part 4085 / 87

COPD and laparoscopy: what threatens the patient most

In COPD under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, the chief threat is the absorbed CO2 load the diseased lungs cannot clear, not worsened V/Q mismatch.

Why

Insufflated CO2 is absorbed into the blood and has to be breathed off. In COPD there are fewer intact alveolar units and less effective alveolar ventilation, so arterial CO2 can climb quickly and severely, and capnography tracks it poorly. The resulting hypercarbia and acidosis weaken contractility, provoke arrhythmias and dilate arteries. Pneumoperitoneum does push the abdomen upward and add atelectasis and V/Q mismatch, most in obese patients. But measured dead space and shunt barely change, so mismatch is not what drives the CO2 rise.

The trap

Worsened ventilation-perfusion mismatch. V/Q mismatch sounds like the natural lung problem in COPD, and pneumoperitoneum does add some, especially in obese patients. But measured dead space and shunt change little. What overwhelms the COPD patient is absorbed CO2 that poorly ventilated lungs cannot excrete.

Evidence

Barash: in advanced COPD, fewer functioning lung units let arterial CO2 rise fast and severely during pneumoperitoneum, and capnography correlates poorly with it. The acidosis depresses the heart and causes arrhythmias. Pneumoperitoneum adds V/Q mismatch, mostly in obesity, yet dead space and shunt barely change.

Sources: Barash 9e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
In severe COPD under CO2 pneumoperitoneum, what is the chief threat?

Absorbed CO2 the lungs cannot clear

Common misconception Worsened V/Q mismatch is the main threat

Does capnography track arterial CO2 well in advanced COPD during laparoscopy?

No; correlation is poor

Report a problem with entry 85: COPD and laparoscopy: what threatens the patient most

Part 4086 / 87

Laparoscopy in significant cardiopulmonary disease: limiting the harm

In cardiopulmonary disease, insufflate flat and hold intra-abdominal pressure at 12–15 mmHg, the lowest that gives exposure. Treat hypertension by deepening anaesthesia first.

Why

Absorbed carbon dioxide dilates vessels, provokes arrhythmias, depresses the myocardium and raises pulmonary vascular resistance. A failing right ventricle tolerates this poorly, and patients with little reserve cannot absorb these insults. The guideline therefore drops a fixed routine pressure for the minimum that still shows the field. When reserve is limited it even offers wall-lifting with low-pressure gas. Head-down tilt is not harmful in itself: begin level and tilt later if surgery needs it. Correct acute hypertension first by adjusting anaesthetic depth; keep vasoactive drugs for severe cases.

The trap

Higher pressure. Higher pressures are common and give the surgeon a roomier field, so they feel standard. With poor cardiac or pulmonary reserve they add to the gas and haemodynamic burden. The guideline asks for the lowest pressure that achieves exposure, not a routine high one.

Evidence

The European endoscopic surgery guideline advises the lowest abdominal pressure that gives adequate exposure rather than a routine setting. For limited cardiac or pulmonary function it suggests wall-lifting with low-pressure gas. Barash treats acute hypertension by adjusting depth, reserving short-acting vasoactive agents for severe cases.

Sources: Barash 9eOutside our books: The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery (2002)

Clues · tap one to see the answer
What intra-abdominal pressure suits laparoscopy in a patient with poor cardiac reserve?

The lowest pressure that still gives adequate exposure

Common misconception Routine high pressures of 15 to 20 are fine

Acute hypertension develops on insufflation in such a patient. First step?

Deepen anaesthesia

Report a problem with entry 86: Laparoscopy in significant cardiopulmonary disease: limiting the harm

Part 4087 / 87

Gastric tube during laparoscopy: what it achieves

Before laparoscopic entry, empty the stomach with an orogastric tube. The main reason is to protect the stomach from needle and trocar injury.

Why

Gut injury can happen at abdominal entry or later in the case. Many intestinal injuries are missed, so the risk of sepsis is high when they do occur. A gas-filled stomach is larger and lies nearer the upper-abdominal entry path, so the insufflation needle or a trocar can hit it more easily. Emptying it before surgery starts makes the target smaller. Barash therefore advises doing this routinely, and Miller says it lowers the chance of a trocar entering the stomach.

The trap

Preventing vomiting. This is tempting because the textbook does say that emptying the stomach may help prevent vomiting. That statement comes from tonsillectomy, where stomach contents set off the vomiting centre. For laparoscopic entry the stated reason is avoiding gastric puncture, so reducing organ injury is the answer.

Evidence

Barash recommends routinely emptying the stomach with an orogastric tube before surgery begins to reduce gastric injury. Miller agrees it may lower the chance of a trocar entering the stomach. The anti-vomiting role of gastric decompression is described for tonsillectomy.

Sources: Barash 9eMiller 10e

Clues · tap one to see the answer
Main reason to pass an orogastric tube before laparoscopic entry?

To protect the stomach from needle and trocar injury

Common misconception The tube is mainly to reduce vomiting

When should the stomach be emptied relative to abdominal entry?

Before entry, at the start of surgery

Report a problem with entry 87: Gastric tube during laparoscopy: what it achieves

Back to card 18Back to contents

Sheet 06 · Perioperative Medicine87 / 87

That is every concept on the perioperative medicine sheet.

Back on the cards, the quiz checks what stuck.

Take the quiz